Re: [c-nsp] SRC5, And The BFD Bug Remains :-( - *sigh*

2009-11-15 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:27:17PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 02:35:59AM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote: What quality networking, we have these days... Hey, at least you *have* BFD. Unlike us folks with SXH and SXI that want to use BFD on SVI interfaces... They

Re: [c-nsp] SRC5, And The BFD Bug Remains :-( - *sigh*

2009-11-15 Thread Mark Tinka
On Monday 16 November 2009 02:59:10 am Richard A Steenbergen wrote: They pulled BFD from SVI's on SR code too. Not that it's any more broken than BFD on physical interfaces really. :) I have it configured on physical interfaces on a 7604/RSP720-3CXL running 12.2(33)SRC5. Cheers, Mark.

[c-nsp] SRC5, And The BFD Bug Remains :-( - *sigh*

2009-11-14 Thread Mark Tinka
So after chasing this thing since SRC, and having gone through all the various rebuilds until now, I'm not proud to say that the evil BFD + watchdog nmi timeout bug persists. It wasn't but just a day ago that an NPE-G1 we upgraded to SRC5, and on which we enabled BFD in the hopes that that bug

Re: [c-nsp] SRC5, And The BFD Bug Remains :-( - *sigh*

2009-11-14 Thread Daniel Roesen
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 02:35:59AM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote: What quality networking, we have these days... I think it's called Carrier grade these days... Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: d...@cluenet.de -- d...@ircnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0

Re: [c-nsp] SRC5, And The BFD Bug Remains :-( - *sigh*

2009-11-14 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 02:35:59AM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote: What quality networking, we have these days... Hey, at least you *have* BFD. Unlike us folks with SXH and SXI that want to use BFD on SVI interfaces... gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!