On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:27:17PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 02:35:59AM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
What quality networking, we have these days...
Hey, at least you *have* BFD. Unlike us folks with SXH and SXI that
want to use BFD on SVI interfaces...
They
On Monday 16 November 2009 02:59:10 am Richard A Steenbergen
wrote:
They pulled BFD from SVI's on SR code too. Not that it's
any more broken than BFD on physical interfaces really.
:)
I have it configured on physical interfaces on a
7604/RSP720-3CXL running 12.2(33)SRC5.
Cheers,
Mark.
So after chasing this thing since SRC, and having gone
through all the various rebuilds until now, I'm not proud to
say that the evil BFD + watchdog nmi timeout bug persists.
It wasn't but just a day ago that an NPE-G1 we upgraded to
SRC5, and on which we enabled BFD in the hopes that that bug
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 02:35:59AM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
What quality networking, we have these days...
I think it's called Carrier grade these days...
Best regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: d...@cluenet.de -- d...@ircnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 02:35:59AM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
What quality networking, we have these days...
Hey, at least you *have* BFD. Unlike us folks with SXH and SXI that
want to use BFD on SVI interfaces...
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!