First: Request an AM/SE who can get you the information you need to make an
educated purchase.
Second: From memory (and its been a year) the ASR 9001 was treated as a
single line card with regard to licensing, similar to a MOD-80 or MOD-160
in a larger chassis. Feel free to correct me here Cisco
Hello,
A9K-9001-AIP-LIC license used to activate on ASR9001 on full box. On ASR9001
you need only one license for all bays.
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:50:41 +1100
CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Am looking at getting a couple of the ASR9001's in the next few months,
The issue is that the customer is connected to a switch connected to the 7613
and i Have a trunk to transport all Vlans for other customers with different
services
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:02:52 +0200
From: mihaigabr...@gmail.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] AToM
AFAIk, you cannot create AToM using SVI's in 7600 (we are using lan cards)
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Mohammad Khalil eng_m...@hotmail.com
wrote:
The issue is that the customer is connected to a switch connected to the
7613 and i Have a trunk to transport all Vlans for other customers
Hi Adam
Thanks for the reply
Yes i installed the functioning RSP in the lower slot , but actually i did not
wait for 45 minutes :)
I will give it a last try
Thanks again
BR,
Mohammad
From: adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk
To: eng_m...@hotmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp]
ooh , so I have to create sub interface in order to make the setup ?
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:24:50 +0200
From: mihaigabr...@gmail.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] AToM
AFAIk, you cannot create AToM using SVI's in 7600 (we are using lan cards)
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:10:17AM +0200, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
The issue is that the customer is connected to a switch connected to the 7613
and i Have a trunk to transport all Vlans for other customers with different
services
Google for MUX-UNI. Then just do so.
gert
--
USENET is
Hi Everyone,
Am looking at getting a couple of the ASR9001's in the next few months, but our
Cisco AM cannot clearly tell me what the AIP license is for (Other than
providing L3VPN functionality...but not how many instances, or if an AIP is
required per line card in each bay?)
i.e.
Am using c7600s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(33)SRE10
The module of concern is ES+
10 7600 ES+ DFC LITE 7600-ES+3C SAL1644R89R 1.3Ok
10 7600 ES+ 20xGE SFP 7600-ES+20GSAL1644RA2X 1.2Ok
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:58:11 +0100
From:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:11:18AM +0200, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
Am using c7600s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(33)SRE10
The module of concern is ES+
10 7600 ES+ DFC LITE 7600-ES+3C SAL1644R89R 1.3Ok
10 7600 ES+ 20xGE SFP 7600-ES+20G
No , I already tried it and the sub interface was not created according to the
templates I found on google.com !!
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:18:48 +0100
From: g...@greenie.muc.de
To: eng_m...@hotmail.com
CC: g...@greenie.muc.de; mihaigabr...@gmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re:
On 24 March 2015 at 07:49, Mohammad Khalil eng_m...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi all
I am trying to establish AToM between 7613 and 3600
The module from the 7613 side is 7600 ES+ 20xGE SFP
Do you mean the port facing the ME3600 is on the ES+ line card or the
port facing the customer is on the ES+
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 09:27:45AM +, James Bensley wrote:
If the ES+ line card is not the card that faces the 3600 what card
does face the 3600? If that is a basic LAN card there will be a
problem in that the LAN card on the egress part of the link is unable
to impose (push) the
The ES+ card is connected to the other PE side , from customer side it is
connected to module 7
7 Policy Feature Card 3 WS-F6K-PFC3B SAL1126SR6Y 2.3Ok
7 MSFC3 Daughterboard WS-SUP720 SAL1126T2AG 3.0Ok
From: jwbens...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 25 Mar
On 25 March 2015 at 09:45, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 09:27:45AM +, James Bensley wrote:
If the ES+ line card is not the card that faces the 3600 what card
does face the 3600? If that is a basic LAN card there will be a
problem in that the LAN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco IOS Software and IOS XE Software Internet Key Exchange Version 2 Denial
of Service Vulnerabilities
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20150325-ikev2
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2015 March 25 16:00 UTC (GMT)
Summary
===
Devices running Cisco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco IOS Software and IOS XE Software Autonomic
Networking Infrastructure
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20150325-ani
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2015 March 25 16:00 UTC (GMT)
Summary
===
The Autonomic Networking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco IOS Software and IOS XE Software mDNS Gateway Denial of Service
Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20150325-mdns
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2015 March 25 16:00 UTC (GMT)
Summary
===
A vulnerability in the multicast DNS (mDNS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco IOS Software and IOS XE Software TCP Packet Memory Leak Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20150325-tcpleak
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2015 March 25 16:00 UTC (GMT)
Summary
===
A vulnerability in the TCP input module of Cisco IOS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco IOS Software Virtual Routing and Forwarding ICMP Queue Wedge Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20150325-wedge
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2015 March 25 16:00 UTC (GMT)
Summary
===
A vulnerability within the virtual routing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco IOS XE Software for Cisco ASR 1000 Series,
Cisco ISR 4400 Series, and Cisco Cloud Services 1000v Series Routers
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20150325-iosxe
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2015 March 25 16:00 UTC (GMT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco IOS Software Common Industrial Protocol
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20150325-cip
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2015 March 25 16:00 UTC (GMT)
Summary
===
The Cisco IOS Software implementation of the Common
Hi
Just wondering cisco no longer maintaining the portable data sheets ? Looking
for the nexus and ASR routers .
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf
Thanks and RegardsGireesh
___
cisco-nsp
On 3/24/2015 3:06 PM, James Bensley wrote:
Its 12MBs shared.
James.
Pardon my ignorance once again, but is this showstopper bad? The
me3800x appears to have 352MB, so clearly a lot more, but IIRC older
switches like the 3560 had something like 2MB per ASIC. I'm assuming one
I'm assuming one of the main reasons for buffers on a unit like this is
the speed disparity between 10ge and 1ge ports, unless you're planning
to do a lot of shaping (rather than policing) - is this correct?
Not sure if I understood what you meant exactly, but speed mismatch
and shaping both
On 3/24/2015 3:06 PM, James Bensley wrote:
Its 12MBs shared.
James.
Pardon my ignorance once again, but is this showstopper bad? The
me3800x appears to have 352MB, so clearly a lot more, but IIRC older
switches like the 3560 had something like 2MB per ASIC. I'm assuming one
of the main
restarting the NTP service might fix the problem, although if I'm reading
this right, you restarted the Windows Servers after changing the NTP source.
I'm assuming that you changed the C:\Program Files (x86)\NTP\etc\ntp.conf
file to use the new address AND removed the old one. Directions from
The ES+ card is connected to the other PE side , from customer side it is
connected to module 7
7 Policy Feature Card 3 WS-F6K-PFC3B SAL1126SR6Y 2.3 Ok
7 MSFC3 Daughterboard WS-SUP720 SAL1126T2AG 3.0 Ok
Which is what the guys here are saying all along:
If you core (MPLS) facing module is a
28 matches
Mail list logo
