Hello Mark, hello Jakob,
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 03:03, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On 18/Apr/20 16:23, Lukas Tribus wrote:
>
> >
> > More about this issue here:
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/nanog@nanog.org/msg104776.html
> >
> > Code with CSCvc84848 fixed will hopefully ship this summer, until then
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Lukas,
On 11/28, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hello Mark, hello Jakob,
>
> On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 03:03, Mark Tinka wrote:
> > On 18/Apr/20 16:23, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > More about this issue here:
> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/nanog@nanog.org/msg104776.html
>
On 11/28/20 02:32, Ben Maddison via cisco-nsp wrote:
At this stage, I don't really care if they fix this anymore.
We're now firmly pointed at the "no more XE in the field" target, and
this is only one (admittedly large) reason why.
This; for us too.
Simply moving on.
In relation to this pa
On 11/25/20 20:57, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote:
Best thing you can do is not estimate, but actually test.
Agree.
I recall doing this back in 2014 when we first launched the CSR1000v as
an RR.
It had about 20 clients, each needing a full feed.
We reset all sessions on the RR. Bet