Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001-X etherchannel subinterfaces

2016-10-11 Thread James Bensley
On 10 October 2016 at 23:18, Chris Balmain wrote: > Hi there, > > We're currently evaluating ASR1001-X with XE 3.16.00S / 15.5(3)S running BRAS > role "on a stick" using 2x10G in an LACP etherchannel. Upgrade to 03.16.03a.S to fix lots of bugs (3.16.4aS is out now too!). Also QoS over LAGs when

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001-X etherchannel subinterfaces

2016-10-10 Thread Ted Johansson
Have you evaluated ASR9001-S running as BRAS? You have IOS-XR instead and perhaps the price is slightly lower than the ASR1001-X. Best Regards Ted Johansson -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Balmain Sent: den 11 oktober 201