It never worked, when I sent that reply I had mistakenly thought it
was an internal email.
I feel sorry for you Tim :-) ... you continue to get beat up for a simple
mistake from many many moons ago!
This e-mail, including any attachments and response string, may contain
proprietary
I have seen some pretty low level problems with multicast packets being dropped
on the floor by the hardware forwarded on 67xx linecards. The bug seems to
appear when changes that effect the asic (turning on mls qos for example).
Resetting the sup engine doesn't resolve it. Everything looks
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:29:18 -0400, you wrote:
I have seen some pretty low level problems with multicast packets
being dropped on the floor by the hardware forwarded on 67xx
linecards. The bug seems to appear when changes that effect the asic
(turning on mls qos for example). Resetting the
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists
li...@hojmark.org wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:29:18 -0400, you wrote:
I have seen some pretty low level problems with multicast packets
being dropped on the floor by the hardware forwarded on 67xx
linecards. The bug seems to appear
John,
Is your 6748 a DFC line card? If so you are correct, moving from port 24 to 25
would have moved you to the other Janus ASIC. Janus is the fabric/mcast
replication ASIC.
If your problem is ONLY with mcast then you can safely ignore the Rohini. We
have addressed a number of issues with
It is a DFC card. We have a TAC case open about this, but we have
instances of weirdness happening on another device recently that is
similar and we haven't opened a TAC case yet on that one. I wonder if
we're running into an issue with the Janus ASIC. That has been
suggested by some people here,
Also, I forgot to mention that we have a lot of high-rate multicast
flows. Quite a few of them. Do you have an recommendations on how to
determine if we're running into scale limits for this hardware?
Thanks!
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Benjamin Lovell belov...@cisco.com wrote:
John,
Is
Moving from port 24 to 25 moves you to the other Janus regardless of
whether there's a DFC or not.
John, if as you say moving to the other replication engine (RE)
solves the problem, it's possible you are simply exceeding the
replication capacity of the Janus.
Metro based cards (6708, 6716)
It never worked, when I sent that reply I had mistakenly thought it
was an internal email.
The closest public thing you'll probably find is the 6500 h/w
architecture decks from networkers. That, or talk to your Cisco account team.
Tim
At 01:17 PM 7/29/2010, Mikhail submitted:
Googling
