On 30 January 2019 15:15:02 GMT, Aaron Gould wrote:
>I read that SR/SPRING is an alternative to LDP or RSVP... seems that
>SR/SPRING is a label distribution protocol. Meaning, in my mind, it's
>a way
>to learn labels...mpls labels I guess. If so, would we refer to EVPN
>as
>EVPN-SR? If so,
Ummm, that too. LOL
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
James Bensley
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 9:05 AM
To: Tom Ammon; Cisco-nsp List
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] segment routing/evpn on ASR920
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 02:36
I read that SR/SPRING is an alternative to LDP or RSVP... seems that
SR/SPRING is a label distribution protocol. Meaning, in my mind, it's a way
to learn labels...mpls labels I guess. If so, would we refer to EVPN as
EVPN-SR? If so, would it follow that a non-sr network, one that has
employed
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 02:36, Tom Ammon wrote:
>
> Has anybody tried running segment routing on ASR920? If so, did you run in
> to any caveats? What about EVPN over segment routing on that platform? The
> SR configuration guide for this platform lists segment routing, but doesn't
> call out EVPN
