Re: [cisco-voip] DTMF tone

2014-05-15 Thread costas georgiou
Hi Anthony, I have installed I took CUCM trace and used Translator X, when I scroll down to the bottom, under DTMF Method Originator details i see: (3) Out of Band and RFC2833. Under Destination details i see:(1) Out of Band (KPML / NOTIFY) This is on a call that did not work when being

Re: [cisco-voip] Digit Delay on 7 digit dialing

2014-05-15 Thread Brian Meade
Matthew, Just got your log file. I don't see the good example to compare but here's what happens in the bad example: The Digit Analysis response shows that there are still off-net potential matches that exist: 80256949.000 |10:38:02.774 |SdlSig |DaRes |info_da

Re: [cisco-voip] DTMF tone

2014-05-15 Thread Anthony Holloway
Ok so it looks like I was mistaken. TranslatorX is not showing what was negotiated, rather what was advertised. However, in this case, your H323 side does have both OOB and IB and your SIP side has OOB. That should mean no MTP. What do you see for a good call? I wonder if it will be RFC2833 for

Re: [cisco-voip] Digit Delay on 7 digit dialing

2014-05-15 Thread Anthony Holloway
I don't think DNA shows you potential matches in that way though. For example: take patterns 1XXX AND 12XX. If I DNA for 1250 I should hit 12XX and DNA should show 1XXX as alternate match. However that does not cause T302. If I also had a pattern 1250X then I would hit T302 but DNA will not show

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber and Desktop Sharing?

2014-05-15 Thread Matthew Loraditch
Everything I understand is that is still the case. It’s one of the reasons we still have to run Lync internally. Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA 1965 Greenspring Drive Timonium, MD 21093 direct voice. 443.541.1518 fax. 410.252.9284 Twitterhttp://twitter.com/heliontech |

[cisco-voip] so I was wrong on the documentation is wrong

2014-05-15 Thread Jason Aarons (AM)
CUCM 10.0.1 and IMP 10.0.01 Which wins? The Jabber-config.xml or the Service Profile? I've heard different feedback from various TAC engineers. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/jabber/Windows/9_7/JABW_BK_C4C679C9_00_cisco-jabber-for-windows-97.pdf Note: In instances

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber and Desktop Sharing?

2014-05-15 Thread Anthony Holloway
Jason, I found it here: - Users must be on active calls to use video desktop sharing capabilities. You can only initiate video desktop sharing sessions from active calls. Source:

Re: [cisco-voip] so I was wrong on the documentation is wrong

2014-05-15 Thread Ted Nugent
Last time I setup IMP for 9.1 the xml file didn't appear to have any effect and Jabber was pulling everything from the Service Profile. I even got TAC engaged and he agreed it didn't appear to be doing anything at least for the info we were trying to map. So that may be accurate. On Thu, May 15,

Re: [cisco-voip] so I was wrong on the documentation is wrong

2014-05-15 Thread Aaron Daniels - Lists
Don't know about 10, but in 9.x it was all dependant on where you pointed the client.  cuplogin - xml cisco-uds - service profile Aaron Send from my Samsung GALAXY S4 MINI on the Telstra Mobile network Original message From: Ted Nugent tednugen...@gmail.com Date: 16/05/2014

Re: [cisco-voip] Digit Delay on 7 digit dialing

2014-05-15 Thread Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
Or just turn on the Digit Analysis Complexity service parameter (where on means the obviously-worded value that will help you), make your call, turn it back to default, then collect traces. -Ryan On May 15, 2014, at 12:26 PM, Heim, Dennis dennis.h...@wwt.commailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com wrote: