9458 WRN 10:33:53.565705 CVM-http.ListenerHttpFailed: EMCC=true]
listener.httpFailed:
http://10.X:8080/emapp/EMAppServlet?device=SEP501CBFEMCC=true
9459 NOT 10:33:53.933852 CVM-XsiResponse::httpFailed: [thread=Extension
Mobility/1124995487 MQThread][class=cip.srvc.f] httpFailed:
Security by default I would normally say, but tis showing just http.
Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01CF8C84.ECE7A710]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
Sorry, I read the email and not the subject.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Brian Meade bmead...@vt.edu wrote:
You mean the Java warnings?
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca
wrote:
Anyone having the issue where opening a ticket with the TAC online tool
You mean the Java warnings?
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca wrote:
Anyone having the issue where opening a ticket with the TAC online tool
always prompts with security warning even after clicking always allow?
Lelio
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior
yup. they look like this:
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph
519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
le...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario,
Packet caputre during login might show more detail as to why it's failing.
I know previous vesions of firmware worked with EMCC.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Matthew Loraditch
mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com wrote:
9458 WRN 10:33:53.565705 CVM-http.ListenerHttpFailed:
I recently opened a case and the TAC engineer ran the utils diagnose test
command on two of the subscribers. We saw the following output regarding NTP.
Similar output on all subscribers.
==
test - ntp_stratum : Failed
The reference NTP server is a stratum 5 clock.
NTP
I get that warning and a lot of other Java defects/oddities…I mostly use
Firefox 30 or whatever version it is today and the latest Java version of the
week.
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio
Fulgenzi
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 10:22 AM
To: Cisco
Hey all,
Has anyone bought a BE6000/BE7000/UC on UCS bundle and bought the
additional R-VMW-UC-FND5-K9 SKU for UC Virtualization Foundation instead of
the normal UC Virtualization Hypervisor?
The UC Virtualization Hypervisor is just VMWare ESXi Free version.
UC Virtualization Foundation adds
