Thanks James/Tim for all your valuable feedback.
One last question, regarding the Split Certificate introduced in MR5, I already
have a certificate signed from a public CA and it's working fine (my current
version is 2.5 base release), so after updating to MR5 with Split Certificate
do I have
Our Current call recording vendor just told me they only support SCCP
phones. is anyone else using a Forked audio call recording server that
supports SIP and Built in Bridge? we are migrating to 8861's which are SIP
phones.
What Vendors are you using and do you have the pro's and con's you
Thanks James.
Best Regards
Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network Engineer - BMB KSA
On Jun 12, 2015, at 7:32 PM, James Buchanan
james.buchan...@gmail.commailto:james.buchan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
The split cert is optional. Your certs should continue working normally.
Thanks,
James
Document released today on cisco.comhttp://cisco.com regarding UC
Applications impacted by the June 30th Leap Second:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-callmanager/119036-technote-vos-00.html
-Matt
On Jun 10, 2015, at 1:44 PM, Wes
Scott, while I did not work on that particular part of the engagement, a
previous customer of mine used Telstrat. The phones were 79xx series
running SIP firmware, and it also supported secure recording of SRTP
streams. However, I can offer no comment or pros/cons of the software -
other than that
We currently use both verint and higher ground. The latter is using both a
span port and built in bridge (two separate installs).
Verint is expensive and is frustrating to support since they love using
Java. But it works.
Higher ground easy to install and support but it depends on a thick
Is anyone aware of any tomcat virtual memory issues in 10.5.2 SU1 or
maybe a tomcat memory leak?
We're getting RTMT alerts about low virtual memory on different 10.5
clusters since updating them from 8.x or 9.x. The VMs have 4 gig
memory from prior version OVA and the CPU/memory on VM matches
Is the https/ssh to the CIMC or vSphere or some application that is guest?
Sound like maybe a host update (does the UEFI/BIOS, Controller, NICs etc) to
fix a bug if CIMC.
The CIMC has a dedicated NIC, are you using that? Normally I won’t do a trunk
port to the CIMC, but switchport mode
Greg W
Solutions Engineer
This message w/attachments (message) is solely for the use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender,
and then please delete and destroy
I'm not sure of a bug, but I do know in 11.0 they are increasing the memory
requirements for all CUCM VMs because of increased memory usage over time.
Could possibly just be a tuning issue with the alert settings.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip
Thanks to all who investigate this issue or post advise.
We have a UCS c220 and while the configuration by our reseller seemed to be
solid we are unable to telnet, SSH, or access via browser HTTPS (unless we are
on the same exact subnet and connected via Ethernet to the switchport) the UCS
We are having issues with it on CUC 10.5.1, and TAC tells us it's a false
alert and we can ignore it. They have no plans to fix it. If anyone wants
more details, I can give it to you and/or a TAC case number.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Erick Bergquist erick...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep,
I should also add this is intermittent. Sometimes Jabber will connection
to Unity Connection just fine with SSO. Sometimes it will try to connect
to the DNS servers (Show Connection Status shows the DNS server as
voicemail) and fail. Sometimes it will try to connect to Unity Connection
but
13 matches
Mail list logo
