I believe you need to specify the fully qualified tftp path; at least you did when I last played with it.Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device Original message From: "Louis Koekemoer (ZA)" Date:10/06/2015 5:02 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Justin Steinberg Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subj
So in my case I should only put Background.png ? As I say it is a new
installation and at the moment it is only 2 phones that I’m busy testing with.
We will be rolling out phones in about a week’s time.
Kind regards
Louis Koekemoer
Principle Systems Engineer – Converged Communications
Dimensio
i believe you just put the file name in that field, so like below.
Background.png
I will say that I did this for the first time on 9.12 via the common phone
profile and applied the config. It dropped every call in progress. This
was an early 9.1 and the phones were 8945s. I never investigat
definitely. i just wanted to see if i needed something different. when we're
ready to test, i'll configure it up again.
i'm hoping it's an easy thing to set up. there are a lot of parts! ;)
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services
You can and you also get some time in that grace period to play.
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio
Fulgenzi
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 3:25 PM
To: Brian Meade
Cc: voip puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] registering C60 to CUCM v9 - easy? license?
yup. i just did a quick test loading it in and it gave me a license usage
error. i'll have to see how much those are and hope that i can buy one at a
time. ;)
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph
I believe you need a Telepresence Room license in CUCM for those.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> i've got a C60 in a box that i'd like to use. on cucm v9, it looks like i
> can configure and register it natively. just wondering how difficult it
> might be to get going.
i've got a C60 in a box that i'd like to use. on cucm v9, it looks like i can
configure and register it natively. just wondering how difficult it might be to
get going. also... what license is used? I've got some CUWL standard licenses -
will that suffice?
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senio
The bug info was pulled from Release Notes last year for two reasons.
First, the bugs affecting a version is out of date pretty much before the tech
writer has finished writing up the list.
Second, the people that write the release notes spent a ton of time coming up
with the list that was the
Hit send too soon...one last thing for Erick.
You can also export up to 10,000 defects as a spreadsheet:
"You can export all the bug details from your search to a Microsoft Excel
spreadsheet so you can view them later at your convenience. Presently, up
to 10,000 bugs can be exported at a time to
I am going to submit feedback right now as well. However, I will say that
you can apply the same arguments against defects listed in the release
notes as you did with having to use the BST.
I.e., Who knows if the Release Notes Author(s) is/are including all of the
bugs or leaving some out.
Also,
For example, on the latest UCCX 10.6.1 SU1 release notes they don't
list the caveats fixed and provide a link to the bug search tool. I
sent an email to the feedback link provided in the release notes
document and got an email back this morning from cisco thanking me for
my feedback and explainin
Please remove me from this list
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
The problem is we don't know for sure that the BU is doing that and if we
review bugtoolkit on monday it could be changed on tuesday. Reviewing
defects in a release notes file is more assuring.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Brian Meade wrote:
> I do agree it's annoying that they're not list
I do agree it's annoying that they're not listed anymore in the release
notes. The bright side is at least this forces the BU to make sure all of
the resolved/open bugs for that version actually have the correct versions
documented in the bug search tool.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Ryan Huff
#truth
Area that could really be improved
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 07:05:43 -0400
From: jsteinb...@gmail.com
To: erick...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Understanding a Defect's Affected Versions
CC: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
I agree with that. It's too hard to know how to search the bug too
That is exactly what happened,
thanks Ryan, for the in-depth explanation.
Abebe,
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Ryan Huff wrote:
> My suspicion (and this is just a guess really, without more detail); is
> that after the 10.5 update was applied, but before the switch version was
> completed,
I agree with that. It's too hard to know how to search the bug toolkit for
fixes in a certain version.
On Oct 5, 2015 11:54 PM, "Erick Bergquist" wrote:
> I'm also not a fan of the newer release notes not including a list of
> the Resolved Bugs, but a link to bug search tool...
>
> That leaves i
My suspicion (and this is just a guess really, without more detail); is that
after the 10.5 update was applied, but before the switch version was completed,
changes where made to the data in the 9.1 version.
When staging an upgrade in the inactive partition, changes made to the database
in the
Hi,
I upgraded CUCM over the weekend from version 9.1 to 10.5(2) and applied
the upgrade license on the PLM for version 10.x .
I noticed some EM profiles, end users, phones and BLF speed dials
disappeared after the version switch over. Fortunately those missing items
were not much so I added them
20 matches
Mail list logo
