Re: [cisco-voip] DTMF interworking on CUBE - asymmetric payloads

2016-09-29 Thread Sreekanth
Is there a reason you'd like to stick to kpml? Why not try unsolicited notify and avoid using mtp? Also what IOS version is this? On Sep 30, 2016 8:43 AM, "Alan Libbee" wrote: > I ended up doing the Joshua plan, forcing an MTP for all calls to UCCX. I > share in your

Re: [cisco-voip] DTMF interworking on CUBE - asymmetric payloads

2016-09-29 Thread Alan Libbee
I ended up doing the Joshua plan, forcing an MTP for all calls to UCCX. I share in your frustration that this is an issue because it almost works perfectly. On Sep 29, 2016 10:52 PM, "Joshua Warcop" wrote: > Is this on a 4K or ASR router? Until some of these things are worked

Re: [cisco-voip] DTMF interworking on CUBE - asymmetric payloads

2016-09-29 Thread Joshua Warcop
Is this on a 4K or ASR router? Until some of these things are worked out I think it's a safe assumption that MTP for DTMF interworking is going to be a requirement for CTI routes. Unresolved bug CSCtw50974 is an example. 2900/3900 IOS doesn't seem to exhibit some

Re: [cisco-voip] DTMF interworking on CUBE - asymmetric payloads

2016-09-29 Thread Anthony Holloway
So, what dtmf setup did you go with then, Alan? On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Alan Libbee wrote: > I have run in to the very same issue. It seems that it works fine on a > direct inbound and outbound call, but if an incoming call comes in and is > transferred to a uccx

Re: [cisco-voip] DTMF interworking on CUBE - asymmetric payloads

2016-09-29 Thread Alan Libbee
I have run in to the very same issue. It seems that it works fine on a direct inbound and outbound call, but if an incoming call comes in and is transferred to a uccx application, the first DTMF digit fails after the transfer. We took debugs and tac confirmed the same, it is not a supported

Re: [cisco-voip] DTMF interworking on CUBE - asymmetric payloads

2016-09-29 Thread Brian Meade
Bringing up this old thread as I've been doing RTP-NTE to SIP-KPML on a lot of setups but finally ran into an issue with intermittently digits not being converted from KPML to RTP-NTE. The debugs showed the DTMF-relay conversion being done and the digits being sent through RTP-NTE but packet

Re: [cisco-voip] Webex -- CUWL

2016-09-29 Thread Brian Meade
It's the Cloud Jabber option that you can use instead of on-prem IM For basic WebEx, I believe it's still included in CUWL Pro licensing if you renew that. Might be worth a call to WebEx to see if they didn't know about your renewal. On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Scott Voll