Yea, I haven't ran into any issues with that.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 5:03 PM Mark H. Turpin wrote:
> I haven't tried... Can you do two Unified Comm zones to a single CUCM?
>
> --
> *From:* Brian Meade
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 7, 2020 3:46 PM
> *To:* Mark H. Turpin
>
I haven't tried... Can you do two Unified Comm zones to a single CUCM?
From: Brian Meade
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 3:46 PM
To: Mark H. Turpin
Cc: Gerence Guan ; Anthony Holloway
; cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway Cluster failover for
>>> 1 - Make sure the primary site handles all MRA registrations and the DR
>>> site is only used when the primary is down.
The cluster shares a common DB and distribute the calls across the cluster. If
you’re going to use SRV records to try this, only use different priorities if
you have diff
Those scenarios seem to refer to cross-connecting separate standalone C/E
pairs. In the case of 2 standalone C/E pairs, neither knows about the
other so it shouldn't be an issue.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 3:40 PM Mark H. Turpin wrote:
> I don't believe running unclustered is supported though.
>
>
I don't believe running unclustered is supported though.
The way I interpreted this section in Unsupported Deployments:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/expressway/config_guide/X12-6/exwy_b_mra-expressway-deployment-guide/exwy_b_mra-expressway-deployment-guide_chapter_011.html
