If the devices are “remote” then I believe it is limited to the unique DID
formed between the extension on the device and the e164mask with CER. V911
solutions all seem to use call routing and can’t differentiate which thing
originated the call in any way other than the calling number. That’s
CUCM/CER is not complaint with Ray Baum’s act Phase II. You will need to
deploy Intrado or Redsky to be compliant. I’ve only looked at them for
existing CER customers, but I believe at least redsky has an option without
CER. Don’t worry you have less than a month until Phase II goes into
We have a SIP provider. The issue is that the user requires the same Prime DN
no matter their location. We have a user, for example, at our NY office, he has
a two different home offices in Massachusetts and one in Idaho. Our SIP
provider in order to route E911 requires each phone to an unique
Maybe Intrado? Not sure their minimum requirements but I know we started with
them when they were West, with only a couple hundred DIDs.
On Dec 9, 2021 2:16 PM, Matthew Huff wrote:
No, hosted solution isn’t an option as we have a number of custom solutions
like ring downs, etc…
We already
No, hosted solution isn’t an option as we have a number of custom solutions
like ring downs, etc…
We already have CUCM and Expressway working fine, I just need directions on the
simplest solution for E911 for MRA workers.
Matthew Huff | Director of Technical Operations | OTA Management LLC
I'm very curious if you find something. I'm not aware of anything cost
effective at your size. RedSky's minimum purchase for a CUCM based system is
12-14k.
Have you looked at moving to a hosted phone system? Almost every vendor I'm
aware of includes E911 therein
Matthew Loraditch
Sr.
We are in the process of moving from legacy ISDN PRI for inbound/outbound
dialing to SIP, and E911 has hit us in the face. We have less than 50 users,
where > 90% currently are working from home. They have the same prime dn for
both the office phone and their home phone. We have users that have
