Re: [cisco-voip] Home Cluster in User management

Hi Scott, On the LDAP Directory page you can specify a Feature Group Template. This applies only to new users and does not affect existing already imported users. Within the Feature Group Template (User Management>User/Phone Add) you specify the 'Home Cluster' tick box as well as IM, Service

Re: [cisco-voip] srtp packets

Section 3.1 of RFC3711 states: The "Encrypted Portion" of an SRTP packet consists of the encryption of the RTP payload (including RTP padding when present) of the equivalent RTP packet. The Encrypted Portion MAY be the exact size of the plaintext or MAY be larger. Figure 1 shows

Re: [cisco-voip] Fax topology with ITSP/CUBE and VG310

Sorry I should specify I meant "VG310 in SCCP mode can only support NSE-based Modem Passthrough, NSE-based T.38 relay and Cisco Fax Relay". On 2017-02-15 10:25, dan...@ohnesorge.me wrote: Hi All, Just wanted to confirm my understanding with regards to which Fax topology to shoose. Some key

[cisco-voip] Fax topology with ITSP/CUBE and VG310

Hi All, Just wanted to confirm my understanding with regards to which Fax topology to shoose. Some key points: - The ITSP network to the customer is over a dedicated WAN link with QoS enabled - The ITSP does not support any kind of Fax Relay - The ITSP uses G711 ulaw for all calls

[cisco-voip] MRCP TTS Provide still showing in list after deleting from Provider Page

Hi All, Running UCCX 11.0.1.1-75. When adding a new MRCP TTS Provider e.g. "MRCP Test 1" and then deleting it, upon adding a new Provider again, "MRCP Test 1" is showing from the Provider Name list (alongside IBM, Nuance and Scansoft). Is there any way of deleting the custom entries from

Re: [cisco-voip] Are there any gotchas to watch out for switching to FQDN server names from IP address server names?

One of the most important points that people tend to forget when changing the processnode (System>Server) entries is that MGCP and SCCP gateways will download a config file (like a phone) and will need to resolve these entries. For what ever reason I've seen so many customers not add any ip

Re: [cisco-voip] Serious 11.5 installation defect

-) Scott On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Daniel Ohnesorge via cisco-voip <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> wrote: In this case, the customer has a strict password policy and the password was generated via an internal web app. Normally I would also not use one that long! On 2016-08-22 13:57,

Re: [cisco-voip] Serious 11.5 installation defect

before. That's a first for me. I tend to still use 8 character length. Old habit, I'm sure. Are you consistently deploy 16+ character passwords now a days? On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Daniel Ohnesorge via cisco-voip <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> wrote: Hi All, Just wanted t

Re: [cisco-voip] need help in configuring TP conductor and TP server

Hi Muneeb, Jason Murray from Cisco recorded this excellent YouTube video back in 2014, the foundations are still very much the same, with a few differences if you are deploying the latest versions. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGzNLqDVs60 Thanks, Daniel On 2016-06-03 15:19, Muneeb

Re: [cisco-voip] Add CPU on UC infrastructure

Conveniently the DE's are stating that the minimum size for the CUCM database after v10.5 is 110GB yet the smaller size templates in even the latest version of the OVA is 80GB. So the OVA's are not perfect that's for sure. Sent from my iPhone > On 28 May 2016, at 00:01, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)

Re: [cisco-voip] IM, Jabber, Presence Redundancy Groups, Assigned Presence Server

Hi Anthony, I dare say that the CUPS BU did not give user assignment much thought with regards to geographical regions. What I would do in this instance (and may or may not be possible for you to re-design) is to have separate clusters for your East Coast and West Coast. This would be

Re: [cisco-voip] Admin for this email address?

Hi Jamin, ja...@puck.nether.net or svoll.v...@gmail.com Cheers, Daniel Sent from my iPhone > On 22 Apr 2016, at 08:11, Horton, Jamin wrote: > > Gentlemen, > > Who is the Admin for this address and how can I get in touch with him/her? > Thanks! > > > Jamin

[cisco-voip] Jabber Directory Groups over port 3268

Hi Guys, Just as a quick FYI, Jabber 11.0 - 11.5 doesn't seem to be able to search for Directory Groups over port 389. CUCM>System>LDAP>Directory is currently synced with port 389 and all User Groups (distribution groups from AD) sync over fine. However when searching in Jabber using EDI over

Re: [cisco-voip] Constantly having db replication issues

Hi Nick, At the time of failure, I like to tail the dbl logs to see whats happening. First, run the command to see which log is the latest; file list activelog cm/trace/dbl/sdi date detail. That output will list the last written log file at the bottom for example log16.log. Then you can tail

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco inbound Calls to Lync EV User Call shows as "Anonymous"

Hi Joel A good start would be to run a PCAP on CUCM: utils network capture eth0 size all count 10 file lync While that's running, make the test call. Once completed press CTRL+C and collect the PCAP via CLI (file get activelog platform/cli/lync.cap) or RTMT choosing 'Packet Capture Logs'.

Re: [cisco-voip] Digicert Wildcard cert

Jose, A few things to know; most wildcard certs from Verisign, GoDaddy etc. generate a key pair (private and public key) for you and send you a passphrase protected .pfx or .p12 file which can then be imported to IIS, Apache or any application (even Expressway for that matter). CUCM however

Re: [cisco-voip] cisco prime collaboration provisioning

Greenfield deployment? It's awesome, will use it every time. Brownfield deployment? No where near production ready. TAC typically escalate every case to the BU if anything goes wrong and most cases end up with you, TAC and developers on a WebEx. I see a lot of potential with the product and

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco UCM with Skype for Business

I strongly recommend reviewing the Cisco Live talk that was presented earlier > this year in Melbourne (available at > https://www.ciscolive.com/online/connect/sessionDetail.ww?SESSION_ID=89886 > [2]) , which goes into integration options between Lync/SfB and Cisco, > including limitati

Re: [cisco-voip] bandwidth restrictions for MRA clients - necessary or not?

Lelio, Jabber has been using something call CPVE for a while; Cisco Precision Video Engine. CPVE comes from the Tandberg acquisition and was mainly used in Tandberg Movi (later Jabber Video). CPVE indeed starts at a low quality bitrate and then assesses the network using RTCP and other

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco UCM with Skype for Business

You have a few options but none will suit your needs: - Partitioned Intra-Domain Federation from CUPS to Lync will provide IM/Presence - Direct SIP Trunk to Lync Mediation Server will provide the ability to call Enterprise Voice enabled Lync clients (no video) - VCS/Expressway to Lync

Re: [cisco-voip] Cube Recording Configuration

I'll test it in the lab some time this week but I'm not sure what the problem could be. Sent from my iPhone > On 4 Apr 2016, at 23:27, daniele visaggio wrote: > > Thank you for all of your responses. > > Sadly i'm still not able to get this working. > > @daniel

Re: [cisco-voip] bandwidth restrictions for MRA clients - necessary or not?

You can set up Device Mobility for the Expressway-C /32 address which means if anything is registered in CUCM with the -C IP, it will be placed in a Device Pool of your choosing. We have implemented this and it works great. Sent from my iPhone > On 4 Apr 2016, at 23:39, Lelio Fulgenzi

Re: [cisco-voip] Cube Recording Configuration

Hi All, I think the config looks correct; - Dial-peer 1 is the dial-peer you want to record so you apply media-class 30 - Media-class 30 is associated with recorder 400 - Recorder 400 is associated with media-recording 3 (in other words dial-peer 3) - Dial-peer 3 is the 'SIP Trunk' towards