The best thing about this was how effective it was in spite of how silly you
felt doing it – we kept old hook-switches working for years with that trick 😊
From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of Lelio
Fulgenzi
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2019 9:43 AM
To: Heim, Dennis ; Chris Clouse ;
Jason Aarons (Americas)
r 12” 😊
On Mar 2, 2019, at 12:44 PM, Jason Aarons (Americas)
mailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com>> wrote:
There is never a 13x , feng shui. All things 13 are bad luck.
From: cisco-voip
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>>
On Behalf Of Johnson, Ken
Sent: Friday, March 1,
Yes – thank you Matthew! Agreed – those models have been workhorses and support
for them has been very impressive from Cisco.
It’s funny – in the document they say under [Background]
“New feature implementation——Some phone models were introduced many years ago
(for example, the 7900 series was i
Thank you Brian very much! Your bug search skills are indeed a hidden gem ☺
From: bmead...@gmail.com [mailto:bmead...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian Meade
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 10:28 AM
To: Johnson, Ken
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Softkeys missing on 796X on
We recently began tracking a reported issue where folks with multiple lines on
their phones were finding they were missing all softkeys on their phone under
the following scenario:
· Incoming call comes in on other than the primary line
· User picks up handset (or activates spea
We recently upgraded to CUCM 10.5 and got an alert that we needed to configure
Smart Call Home.
We didn’t know much about it so researched it and it looked like something good
to configure so we did – and then got the error that it couldn’t send the
initial messages because we didn’t have DNS c
We haven't gotten our 8845s yet - but have worked with the 8861 phones for a
while - personally once you get used to them the 8800 series really grows on
you - and it's a really good looking phone as a bonus, both on the screen and
overall design.
As already noted, the absence of text over the
