t;>> and expressways at different datacenters connected by a 10GB wan. If we
>>> were to loose the WAN, we would still fail with MRA since we would lose
>>> both ESXi hosts.
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Lelio Fulgenzi
&
d by a 10GB wan. If we were
>> to loose the WAN, we would still fail with MRA since we would lose both ESXi
>> hosts.
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Lelio Fulgenzi
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 4:30 PM
>> To: Matthew Huff ; Adam Pawlows
we would lose both ESXi
> hosts.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 4:30 PM
> To: Matthew Huff ; Adam Pawlowski ;
> cisco-voip voyp list
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: MRA failover doesn't work, Cisco TAC
full MRA redundancy?
>
> What a let down. ☹
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of Matthew
> Huff
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 1:37 PM
> To: Adam Pawlowski ; cisco-voip voyp list
>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: MRA failover
sday, June 21, 2022 1:37 PM
To: Adam Pawlowski ; cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: MRA failover doesn't work, Cisco TAC
agrees, says it's a documentation defect
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do not
click links or open a
2022 1:37 PM
To: Adam Pawlowski ; cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: MRA failover doesn't work, Cisco TAC
agrees, says it's a documentation defect
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do not
click links or open attachments
e 21, 2022 1:04 PM
To: cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: MRA failover doesn't work, Cisco TAC
agrees, says it's a documentation defect
I'm a bit miffed on the need for the extra expressway C. We have very few MRA
phones, but hadn't had this type of problem, an
t; Brining either one up, and the phone registers.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Hunter Fuller
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 12:41 PM
> To: Matthew Huff
> Cc: Kent Roberts ; cisco-voip voyp list
>
> Subject: Re: [External] Re: [cisco-voip] MRA failover does
gt;
> -Original Message-
> From: Hunter Fuller
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 12:41 PM
> To: Matthew Huff
> Cc: Kent Roberts ; cisco-voip voyp list v...@puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [External] Re: [cisco-voip] MRA failover doesn't work, Cisco TAC
> agrees, says it
; cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [cisco-voip] MRA failover doesn't work, Cisco TAC
agrees, says it's a documentation defect
It might be worth setting up a Jabber test endpoint just to see.
Some questions though:
- Does every Expressway-E know about every Expressway-C?
- Does
10 matches
Mail list logo
