Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

2015-11-10 Thread NateCCIE
Analyst, Network Infrastructure >>> Computing and Communications Services (CCS) >>> University of Guelph >>> >>> 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 >>> le...@uoguelph.ca >>> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs >>> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Buildi

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

2015-11-10 Thread Ed Leatherman
o Fulgenzi, B.A. >> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure >> Computing and Communications Services (CCS) >> University of Guelph >> >> 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 >> le...@uoguelph.ca >> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs >> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building >&g

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

2015-11-06 Thread Ed Leatherman
824‐4120 Ext 56354 > le...@uoguelph.ca > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs > Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building > Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 > > -- > *From: *"Charles Goldsmith" <wo...@justfamily.org> > *To: *"Scott Voll" <svoll.v..

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

2015-06-22 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
Exactly. We are in the same boat. IMO split horizon is security through obscurity and therefore bullshit. --On 19. Juni 2015 07:58:50 -0400 Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca wrote: That's correct. We've not had a need to separate them. I'm _guessing_ many EDUs would be in a similar position.

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

2015-06-19 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
[mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ed Leatherman Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 7:48 AM To: Lelio Fulgenzi Cc: Cisco VOIP Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s I'm chasing this issue now... if palo can't filter on it I might have to (short term) try having people use

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

2015-06-19 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
Engineer Direct Voice: 443.541.1518 Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | G+ From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca] Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 7:59 AM To: Matthew Loraditch Cc: Ed Leatherman; Cisco VOIP Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s That's correct. We've not had

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

2015-06-19 Thread Matthew Loraditch
: Friday, June 19, 2015 7:59 AM To: Matthew Loraditch Cc: Ed Leatherman; Cisco VOIP Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s That's correct. We've not had a need to separate them. I'm _guessing_ many EDUs would be in a similar position. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 19, 2015, at 7:54 AM, Matthew

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

2015-06-19 Thread Matthew Loraditch
Leatherman Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 7:48 AM To: Lelio Fulgenzi Cc: Cisco VOIP Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s I'm chasing this issue now... if palo can't filter on it I might have to (short term) try having people use a separate domain name for external logins, which is also ick

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

2015-06-19 Thread Rob Dawson
I’ll second BIND views, they are a great way to handle split horizon DNS. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Norton, Mike Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 1:29 AM To: Lelio Fulgenzi; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s I don’t

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

2015-06-18 Thread Norton, Mike
] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 8:01 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s I really wish there was another option other than split DNS to get MRA working from off-premise. I mean, why rely on DNS response rather than lack

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

2015-06-18 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 - Original Message - From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org To: Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, 18 June, 2015 7:45:14 PM Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

[cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

2015-06-18 Thread Scott Voll
Im still on UC 8.6. we are planning an upgrade to 10.x We currently have DLU's for licensing and will be moving to CUWL Standard ( I think). How does Expressways factor into this? is it part of CUWL? Is there a Cost? What all can you do with Expressway. What I believe I understand is that

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

2015-06-18 Thread Walenta, Philip
. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 4:58 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s Im still on UC 8.6. we are planning an upgrade to 10.x We currently have DLU's for licensing

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

2015-06-18 Thread Brian Meade
The free part with CUWL is just MRA (Mobile and Remote Access) which allows Jabber clients/8800 series/DX series to register with CUCM from externally. For additional cost per active stream, you can add B2B (Business to Business) licensing so other businesses can easily call into your video

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

2015-06-18 Thread Charles Goldsmith
As said by others, license is free for the MRA part, to get the free license, here is a handy blog entry : https://ciscocollab.wordpress.com/2014/02/20/how-to-get-expressway-c-and-e-licenses/ He also has entries on helping set it up, but it's pretty simple once you get in and start configuring.