Re: [cisco-voip] Self Care Portal + BLF Speed Dials

2015-03-27 Thread Adam Blomfield
You can use broken translation patterns to stop this. i.e. if you have want to prevent the general populous from being able to create a BLF to an executive extension then create a translation pattern for that extension in the first partition in the general users subscribe CSS that translated to

Re: [cisco-voip] Self Care Portal + BLF Speed Dials

2015-03-27 Thread Jason Aarons (AM)
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Self Care Portal + BLF Speed Dials Thanks Ryan, I see what you're saying. Though I would have to counter with: isn't that was subscribe calling search spaces are for? Controlling watcher's visibility to presentities? That would be like saying: We need to remove the CFA

[cisco-voip] Self Care Portal + BLF Speed Dials

2015-03-26 Thread Anthony Holloway
All, I'm running up against the lack of support for BLF management in SCP: https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCus02109 Has anyone run into this and come up with a solution which both: A) Maintains the BLF+Speed Dial functionality B) Allows End Users to self manage the BLF+Speed Dial

Re: [cisco-voip] Self Care Portal + BLF Speed Dials

2015-03-26 Thread Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
The idea behind BLFs and self care portal is that since it lets the user see linestate the admin must provision it. It’s a privacy thing for the user on the BLF destination that originated long before we had Jabber contacts to tell us what the user is up to. If you wanted to do your own it

Re: [cisco-voip] Self Care Portal + BLF Speed Dials

2015-03-26 Thread Anthony Holloway
Thanks Ryan, I see what you're saying. Though I would have to counter with: isn't that was subscribe calling search spaces are for? Controlling watcher's visibility to presentities? That would be like saying: We need to remove the CFA setting from Self Care Portal because we can't control where