Re: [cisco-voip] Understanding a Defect's Affected Versions

ces the BU to make sure all > of > >> the resolved/open bugs for that version actually have the correct > versions > >> documented in the bug search tool. > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> wrote: > >&g

Re: [cisco-voip] Understanding a Defect's Affected Versions

Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> wrote: > #truth > > Area that could really be improved > > -- > Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 07:05:43 -0400 > From: jsteinb...@gmail.com > To: erick...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Understanding a Defect's A

Re: [cisco-voip] Understanding a Defect's Affected Versions

're not listed anymore in the release >> >> notes. The bright side is at least this forces the BU to make sure >> all of >> >> the resolved/open bugs for that version actually have the correct >> versions >> >> documented in the bug search tool. >>

Re: [cisco-voip] Understanding a Defect's Affected Versions

t;ryanh...@outlook.com> wrote: >>> >>> #truth >>> >>> Area that could really be improved >>> >>> ________ >>> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 07:05:43 -0400 >>> From: jsteinb...@gmail.com >>> To: erick...@gma

Re: [cisco-voip] Understanding a Defect's Affected Versions

gt;> > >>> Area that could really be improved > >>> > >>> > >>> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 07:05:43 -0400 > >>> From: jsteinb...@gmail.com > >>> To: erick...@gmail.com > >>> Subject:

Re: [cisco-voip] Understanding a Defect's Affected Versions

I agree with that. It's too hard to know how to search the bug toolkit for fixes in a certain version. On Oct 5, 2015 11:54 PM, "Erick Bergquist" wrote: > I'm also not a fan of the newer release notes not including a list of > the Resolved Bugs, but a link to bug search

Re: [cisco-voip] Understanding a Defect's Affected Versions

Some bugs, like CSCuu58142 effecting single number reach doesn't seem to follow higher versions contain the fix methodology. Bug toolkit says this is fixed in 10.5.2.12028-1 but 10.5.2 SU2, SU2a (10.5.2.12900 and 10.5.2.12901) don't contain the bug fix per TAC and going over the release notes for

Re: [cisco-voip] Understanding a Defect's Affected Versions

10.5.2.12028-1 is an Engineering Special which uses a different numbering scheme. I thought the ReadMe used to show what ES the SU was built off of but having trouble finding it. SU2/SU2a were most likely built off of older engineering specials than 10.5.2.12028-1. The higher release thing

Re: [cisco-voip] Understanding a Defect's Affected Versions

I'm also not a fan of the newer release notes not including a list of the Resolved Bugs, but a link to bug search tool... That leaves it up to us to find what bugs were fixed or hoping bug search tool returns them all, plus not a nice list/summary to glance through. On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:47

Re: [cisco-voip] Understanding a Defect's Affected Versions

it's up to the discretion of the bug author. <-- This means it’s accuracy varies greatly by product and even bug author. For UCM you should always assume you are vulnerable if the fixed-in version is higher than what you are currently running unless the bug description clearly

[cisco-voip] Understanding a Defect's Affected Versions

In reference to this defect: https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuv45722 Can you help me understand what this means as far as all affected versions? On the surface, it would appear that it's only affecting 9.1(2). However, with a fixed in version being way out in 11.5, that would also