Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Small business E911 solution

2021-12-16 Thread Mark Turpin via cisco-voip
isco-voip On Behalf Of Adam Pawlowski Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 4:23 PM To: Matthew Huff ; Johnson, Tim Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Small business E911 solution If the devices are “remote” then I believe it is limited to the unique DID fo

Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Small business E911 solution

2021-12-14 Thread Riley, Sean
, December 13, 2021 5:58 PM To: Riley, Sean ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Small business E911 solution Mobile access aside, how are you going to handle physical infrastructure? Right now, our switches have been deployed using “shortest path” methodology

Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Small business E911 solution

2021-12-13 Thread Adam Pawlowski
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Small business E911 solution Mobile access aside, how are you going to handle physical infrastructure? Right now, our switches have been deployed using “shortest path” methodology. This means, one switch stack could service one quadrant of a building and three

Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Small business E911 solution

2021-12-13 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
On Behalf Of Riley, Sean Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 5:37 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Small business E911 solution CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize

Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Small business E911 solution

2021-12-13 Thread Riley, Sean
; Matthew Huff ; Johnson, Tim Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Small business E911 solution Intrado is the only one that I know of that has the ability to deal with just about every single solution. The only one they can’t handle yet is the softphone within

Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Small business E911 solution

2021-12-10 Thread Palmer, Brian via cisco-voip
: Thursday, December 9, 2021 4:23 PM To: Matthew Huff ; Johnson, Tim Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Small business E911 solution If the devices are “remote” then I believe it is limited to the unique DID formed between the extension on the device

Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Small business E911 solution

2021-12-09 Thread Adam Pawlowski
for the customer to update their location as appropriate. Best, Adam From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of Matthew Huff Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 2:25 PM To: Johnson, Tim Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Small business E911 solution We have a SIP provider

Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Small business E911 solution

2021-12-09 Thread NateCCIE
into effect on January 6th 2022. https://www.fcc.gov/mlts-911-requirements From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of Johnson, Tim Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 12:20 PM To: Matthew Huff Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Small business E911 solution Maybe

Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Small business E911 solution

2021-12-09 Thread Matthew Huff
We have a SIP provider. The issue is that the user requires the same Prime DN no matter their location. We have a user, for example, at our NY office, he has a two different home offices in Massachusetts and one in Idaho. Our SIP provider in order to route E911 requires each phone to an unique

Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Small business E911 solution

2021-12-09 Thread Johnson, Tim
Maybe Intrado? Not sure their minimum requirements but I know we started with them when they were West, with only a couple hundred DIDs. On Dec 9, 2021 2:16 PM, Matthew Huff wrote: No, hosted solution isn’t an option as we have a number of custom solutions like ring downs, etc… We already