Re: [cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in reserve

2017-12-18 Thread Anthony Holloway
ember 15, 2017 11:42 PM > *To:* Terry Oakley <terry.oak...@rdc.ab.ca> > *Cc:* Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com>; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > > > *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in > reserve > > > > Out of curiosity, how lon

Re: [cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in reserve

2017-12-18 Thread Terry Oakley
<terry.oak...@rdc.ab.ca> Cc: Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com>; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in reserve Out of curiosity, how long had Tomcat been running before you restarted it? This isn't at you Terry, but in general

Re: [cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in reserve

2017-12-18 Thread Ki Wi
blem with AXL services. Restarted Tomcat and we appear to be >>>> much better. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------- >>>> *From:* Terry Oakley >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, December 14, 2017 5:29:31 PM >>

Re: [cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in reserve

2017-12-16 Thread Ryan Huff
: Terry Oakley Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 5:29:31 PM To: Ryan Huff Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in reserve Thanks Ryan.. .I will have a look tonight.. PS i don't know how you fin

Re: [cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in reserve

2017-12-16 Thread NateCCIE
now how you find all the time to respond to all of us but I am >> very thankful that you do.  >> From: Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> >> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 5:26:53 PM >> To: Terry Oakley >> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net >> Subject: Re: [cis

Re: [cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in reserve

2017-12-16 Thread Matt Jacobson
I think I found the issue. One of the tests >>> showed a problem with AXL services. Restarted Tomcat and we appear to be >>> much better. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *From:* Terry Oakley >>> *Sent:* Th

Re: [cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in reserve

2017-12-15 Thread Anthony Holloway
gt; *To:* Ryan Huff > > *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in > reserve > > Thanks Ryan.. .I will have a look tonight.. > > > PS i don't know how you find all the time to respond to all of us but I am > ver

Re: [cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in reserve

2017-12-15 Thread Charles Goldsmith
We are seeing the same slowness with 11.5.1 SU3 on CUCM admin pages. Restarting Tomcat resolves the issue. I have not dug deeper, anyone seen a bug ID about it? Restarting Tomcat isn't an option for us routinely, due to EM users. On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Terry Oakley

Re: [cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in reserve

2017-12-14 Thread Terry Oakley
@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in reserve Thanks Ryan.. .I will have a look tonight.. PS i don't know how you find all the time to respond to all of us but I am very thankful that you do.  From: Ryan Huff <ry

Re: [cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in reserve

2017-12-14 Thread Terry Oakley
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in reserve Just based on that description alone, I’d say it might be possible you have some LAN congestion? Everything you’re talking about here is riding http/https. - Any recent QoS policy changes? - Is

Re: [cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in reserve

2017-12-14 Thread Ryan Huff
Just based on that description alone, I’d say it might be possible you have some LAN congestion? Everything you’re talking about here is riding http/https. - Any recent QoS policy changes? - Is other non-UC web traffic slower than normal from those PCs? - Run utils diagnose test on the CLI of