It’s in this thread.
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/voip/187823
UCM wants a cert generated using the CSR it provides. Nate covered in that
thread how to make this work using the Digicert wildcard cert.
-Ryan
On Jul 20, 2015, at 1:20 AM, Rajkumar Yadav
Full set of detailed CCM SDL traces would be needed, not just the call logs
section, in order to dig in deeper. Feel free to send me a set of traces
offline - I can take a quick look. I'm interested specifically in looking at
the ACK from CUCM. If you send traces, it'd need to be from all nodes
One thing of note, Digicert works very well with all of our UC apps with
their UC certificate. Add all of your server names as SAN's, as well as
the domain name, and just duplicate the certificate for each app, changing
the CN. It works well and also Digicert has great support.
On Sun, Jul 19,
Well Lelio, that is what you get for trying to do digit manipulation on a
napkin in between wings! Lol
Thanks,
Ryan
Original Message
From: Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 09:22 PM
To: Ryan Huff ryanh...@outlook.com,natec...@gmail.com
Subject: Re:
I tried creating a dummy CTIRP with a DN of *5XXX and set it to CFA to
8XXX3101. That appears to be configurable (I did it on a test 10.5 box),
and when I check DNA it seems to indicate the correct pattern for the CFA.
However, when I did a quick test dialing out to *5123, I didn't get it to
ring
Nate,
I am not by my Linux machine (refuse to use winblows) to vet this but could you
do:
*5XXX with a CPTM of XXX3101 with a prefix of 8?
Thanks,
Ryan
Original Message
From: NateCCIE natec...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 08:08 PM
To: 'Cisco VOIP'
Called party transformation mask seem to match the XXX to the last digits.
So with a pattern of XXX the XXX can only be in the last 3 digits of the mask
, DNA shows ? And won't route the call if you have Xs to early in the pattern.
Sent from my iPhone
+1 801 718 2308
On Jul 20, 2015, at
Xlate : *5XXX (CPTM: 8XXX)
Route Pattern: 8XXX (CPTM: 3101 Prefix: 8XXX) - Route list/group to h.323
gateway that uses a ccm call processing node as the ip address of the gateway.
It could be the IPA talking but that sounds like it should work?
Thanks,
In v9, translation pattern does not accept X as valid character for prefix
field. :(
Since the purposes are similar, I'm guessing route patterns wouldn't allow it
either.
This is a good one.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications
So rather than use a translation pattern, you would use a route pattern.
Set up an h.323 gateway with a cucm call processing node as the ip address of
the gateway and add that into your route group/route list/route pattern.
That should work in theory.
Thanks,
Ryan
Original Message
That's great to hear about digicert. I just went through a rough time with
Comodo trying to get multiserver certs and my CNAMEs in the SAN field. How
many SAN entries does digicert limit you to and at what price per year?
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:19 AM Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
