I've actually been looking into this myself. Our Wi-Fi system now has a NAT
mechanism which breaks Jabber, and we have a single DNS. As far as I can tell,
even if the client fails to be able to connect with the cisco uds SRV record,
as long as it is there, it will try and connect to the UCM
Thank you for sharing your findings Adam,
Did you determine if the high volume traffic causing an issue is just that sent
to/from the phone, or all data via the built-in switch? If it’s the latter I’d
be surprised if this is a new finding. If I remember the original 7912 had a
traffic issue
Dear Group,
I'm trying to enable SSO for Expressway MRA setup based on this
documentation:
https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/expressway/config_gu
ide/X8-9/Mobile-Remote-Access-via-Expressway-Deployment-Guide-X8-9.pdf
For IdP we're using AD FS 3.0 and what I'm really
There is no Custom Rule for Expressway C. I have this working in multiple ADFS
3 instances.
Just the LDAP rule mapping SAM-Account-Name to UID
[cid:image002.png@01D286C1.C93C7B80]
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
It's definitely going to keep trying those services if it sees _cisco-uds.
I'd try to do external DNS on the wireless as a workaround there.
JID and service discovery domain can definitely be different but AD-joined
PCs will try the AD domain as service discovery domain by default.
On Tue, Feb
we tried this and it didn't work out so well. we didn't try to fix things
because we were on a limited time frame. we also ran into an issue where the
hostname has to match the outside name/certificate details as well as matching
the service discovery domain).
so, where we initially had
Im seeing a generic error saying I cant upload scripts. I saw a bug for 8.x
but rezipping the file or rebuilding still wont work. Server need a reboot?
Dan Mason
-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Here's the issue that happens when these don't match-
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/unified-communications/expressway/118798-technote-cucm-00.html#anc10
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Nick via cisco-voip <
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> I have a customer who doesn't want
I have a customer who doesn't want the Expressway E FQDN to be put into the
public DNS SRV record and wants to use an alias such as an a record in
the collab-edge SRV which points to the public IP, I cant seem to find if
this is supported or not can anyone confirm if this is supported?
u might want to try to get a girlfriend
- Original Message -
From: Lelio Fulgenzi
Date: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 11:27 am
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway MRA design question.
To: "voyp list, cisco-voip"
> we tried this and it didn't work out so well. we didn't try to
> fix
All,
Just to follow up on this one, though it has been a long time…
While the details on the whole thing are very slim, TAC was able to actually
reproduce the issue we were reporting on the 7941/61 and G-GE flavors of phone.
Phones that receive “too much” traffic (somewhere in the order of
If I remember the original 7912 had a traffic issue with the built-in switch,
but I think that was just broadcast traffic and the next gen of that model
fixed it.
The original 7912 didn’t have a switch, it was all done in CPU. This is why it
rolled over with lots of unicast or broadcast
Hi All,
Just wanted to confirm my understanding with regards to which Fax
topology to shoose. Some key points:
- The ITSP network to the customer is over a dedicated WAN link with QoS
enabled
- The ITSP does not support any kind of Fax Relay
- The ITSP uses G711 ulaw for all calls
Sorry I should specify I meant "VG310 in SCCP mode can only support
NSE-based Modem Passthrough, NSE-based T.38 relay and Cisco Fax Relay".
On 2017-02-15 10:25, dan...@ohnesorge.me wrote:
Hi All,
Just wanted to confirm my understanding with regards to which Fax
topology to shoose. Some key
Not sure if it's a standard setup, but if someone has a recent, working CUBE
config for British Telecom they will share please?
I'd appreciate it very much.
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
15 matches
Mail list logo
