[cisco-voip] Cisco Jabber, UDS, High CPU

2018-04-13 Thread ROZA, Ariel
Hi, guys and gals. I am trying to troubleshoot a High CPU Alarm on a CUCM Subscriber: I ran the "utils diagnose test" command and got warnings on the tomcat_sessions module. gathered all the tomcats logs around the time of the event and found lots of GET /cucm-uds/users HTTP/1.1 200 1383

[cisco-voip] BE6K Starter Pack behavior/limitation

2018-04-13 Thread Ki Wi
Hi Group, If I purchased 2 x BE6k starter packs of 35 CUWL Standard license for installation with 2 different clusters. There are located in 2 different part of the world, there's latency issues so we have to do this although number of users are low. How will it show up in PLM? 70 CUWL STD

Re: [cisco-voip] 500 series headsets

2018-04-13 Thread Ed Leatherman
Ahhh the Internet.. If it can provide some manageability features and possibly help out with audio switching (like Brian said), we'll at least check them out. On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > I like the part about the guy who thought 51% was a

Re: [cisco-voip] 500 series headsets

2018-04-13 Thread Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
With the DX it’s just a headset, no special ringtone. I have to update my lab to connect to an 88xx phone. -Ryan On Apr 13, 2018, at 10:28 AM, Brian Meade > wrote: I didn't test that out. Sounds like Ryan may be able to answer that. On Fri, Apr 13,

Re: [cisco-voip] 500 series headsets

2018-04-13 Thread Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
With respect to comparisons on that post to other vendors, on my DX it displaced a Jabra Evolve 80 (which I loved) and I immediately got feedback on the audio quality improvement. My calls are primarily to Spark and WebEx meetings with video so these aren’t just g.711 calls so I’m probably not

Re: [cisco-voip] BE6K Starter Pack behavior/limitation

2018-04-13 Thread Matthew Loraditch
The starter pack is a marketing thing, on the backend it’s just regular licenses and can be pooled. It will just show as 70 licenses as you mentioned and can be shared. Matthew Loraditch Sr. Network Engineer p: 443.541.1518 w: www.heliontechnologies.com | e: mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com

Re: [cisco-voip] BE6K Starter Pack behavior/limitation

2018-04-13 Thread daniele visaggio
Ops, I misread. Sorry You bought two starter kits, so 70 CUWL in total. The answer to both your questions then is yes. Each cucm asks to the plm all the needed licenses, as per your configuration. As long as the total users among the two clusters with less than 10 devices is <= 70, you are

[cisco-voip] 500 series headsets

2018-04-13 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
For those of you with collab user group memberships... an interesting thread on the new headsets Cisco Series 500 Headsets Collaboration Customer Connection (members only) - View the full discussion Sent from my iPhone

Re: [cisco-voip] 500 series headsets

2018-04-13 Thread Anthony Holloway
Do you know if it plays the ringtone from the phone, or if it plays its own ringing audio sound? On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 8:57 AM Brian Meade wrote: > I played around with them at Enterprise Connect. They seemed pretty nice > especially with the phone menu integration to adjust

Re: [cisco-voip] BE6K Starter Pack behavior/limitation

2018-04-13 Thread Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
Somewhere a DC sales person is drooling and doesn’t know why… -Ryan On Apr 13, 2018, at 10:19 AM, Anthony Holloway > wrote: Oooo! I like the sound of that! With full mesh SIP trunks between all of the clusters too. On

Re: [cisco-voip] 500 series headsets

2018-04-13 Thread Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
I’m using a 532 with a DX80 and have been pretty happy with it. I’ve gotten good feedback on audio quality and background noise as well. For those not on CUG these are the headsets. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collaboration-endpoints/headset-500-series/index.html -Ryan On Apr 13,

Re: [cisco-voip] 500 series headsets

2018-04-13 Thread Brian Meade
I didn't test that out. Sounds like Ryan may be able to answer that. On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 10:21 AM, Anthony Holloway < avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > Do you know if it plays the ringtone from the phone, or if it plays its > own ringing audio sound? > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 8:57

Re: [cisco-voip] 500 series headsets

2018-04-13 Thread Anthony Holloway
Seems like most of the complaints so far are on features for the price, as compared to established headset vendors out there. When has Cisco ever been the cheaper option? Seriously, when? I've always thought of Cisco as the higher cost option, but maybe that's a perception that is incorrect.

Re: [cisco-voip] 500 series headsets

2018-04-13 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
I like the part about the guy who thought 51% was a monster discount, only to be followed up by someone saying, 51% is not a monster discount. lol --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50

Re: [cisco-voip] BE6K Starter Pack behavior/limitation

2018-04-13 Thread Anthony Holloway
Oooo! I like the sound of that! With full mesh SIP trunks between all of the clusters too. On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:57 AM daniele visaggio wrote: > Ops, I misread. Sorry > > You bought two starter kits, so 70 CUWL in total. > > The answer to both your questions

Re: [cisco-voip] 500 series headsets

2018-04-13 Thread Brian Meade
I played around with them at Enterprise Connect. They seemed pretty nice especially with the phone menu integration to adjust settings and test audio. I wasn't a fan of how small the in-call indicator is. I think they should have made that a full ring. Having the deep integration into Jabber

Re: [cisco-voip] Audio cut-through delays upon transfer

2018-04-13 Thread Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
In those scenarios you typically need simultaneous packet captures on both sides and debugging on anything in the infrastructure to identify the bad actor. -Ryan On Apr 13, 2018, at 12:42 AM, James Andrewartha > wrote: Indeed it

Re: [cisco-voip] 5 digit and 10 digit dialing

2018-04-13 Thread Anthony Holloway
Whoops! I had at least two mistakes yesterday, regarding my reply. 1) I tried to correct a mistake I made in the pattern example I gave, but replied from a different email address than what's sub'ed to this list, so it bounced back. 2) I used 6120 as an example extension, and I should have used