Re: [cisco-voip] CUAC Standard for Windows 10

2018-08-11 Thread Jonathan Charles
I would like to update that this is what got it to work on a Windows 8 machine... the same process did NOT work on Windows 10 (it launches and never asks for licensing info). Jonathan On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 8:01 PM Jonathan Charles wrote: > I think I just figured out the silliness here... > >

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP

2018-08-11 Thread Benjamin Turner
So should I implement a voice class sip profile to modify the sip headers? Get Outlook for Android From: NateCCIE Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2018 1:46:31 PM To: Benjamin Turner Cc: Ryan Huff; cisco-voip voyp list Subject: Re:

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP

2018-08-11 Thread NateCCIE
You can’t have ip NAT outside on a CUBE. It used to work before the 4K but it was never supported according to TAC and the BU. Inbound traffic goes to the NAT process and the SIP stack never sees it Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 10, 2018, at 9:38 PM, Benjamin Turner wrote: > > My brain is

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP

2018-08-11 Thread Benjamin Turner
I will make changes and reply. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: NateCCIE Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2018 2:24:36 PM To: 'Benjamin Turner' Cc: 'Ryan Huff'; 'cisco-voip voyp list' Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CUBE

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP

2018-08-11 Thread Bill Talley
Is that not essentially what address hiding and binding the telco facing dial-peer to the outside interface accomplishes? Sent from an iOS device with very tiny touchscreen input keys. Please excude my typtos. > On Aug 11, 2018, at 1:24 PM, NateCCIE wrote: > > No, if you want to do NAT, it

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP

2018-08-11 Thread NateCCIE
NAT as in ip nat outside and ip nat inside, etc, would be used for other traffic that is flowing through the router. Address hiding for a SIP connection is different. From: Bill Talley Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2018 1:08 PM To: NateCCIE Cc: Benjamin Turner ; cisco-voip voyp list

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP

2018-08-11 Thread Benjamin Turner
Does anyone have any objections to an IOS upgrade over moving the nat to a loopback interface? Get Outlook for Android From: Bill Talley Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2018 4:21:03 PM To: NateCCIE Cc: Benjamin Turner; cisco-voip voyp list

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP

2018-08-11 Thread NateCCIE
No, if you want to do NAT, it has to be on a different interface than what CUBE is using for SIP. From: Benjamin Turner Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2018 12:03 PM To: NateCCIE Cc: Ryan Huff ; cisco-voip voyp list Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP So should I

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP

2018-08-11 Thread Benjamin Turner
That would explain this behavior, since the SIP traffic isnt being processed by the SIP stack.. NICE!!! Get Outlook for Android From: NateCCIE Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2018 3:55:37 PM To: 'Bill Talley' Cc: 'Benjamin Turner';

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP

2018-08-11 Thread Bill Talley
Right, I may have misunderstood this was CUBE only. Sent from an iOS device with very tiny touchscreen input keys. Please excude my typtos. > On Aug 11, 2018, at 2:55 PM, NateCCIE wrote: > > NAT as in ip nat outside and ip nat inside, etc, would be used for other > traffic that is flowing