Re: [cisco-voip] CUCILYNC 8.6.2 Deskphone issue

2014-02-12 Thread george.hendrix
Anyone with ideas about this? I downgraded to CUCILYNC 8.6.1 and no longer have this issue. As far as I can tell, we can't upgrade to version 9.X because we're not running Lync yet. Thanks, Bill Hendrix From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of

Re: [cisco-voip] Upgrades prohibited... *sigh*

2014-02-12 Thread Ted Nugent
That would be helpful, thanks. I personally don't see a way around it, supported or otherwise, either that or building a new SUB and updating CM Groups, MGRLs etc... Same amount of work and a couple resets but no downtime. On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Matthew Loraditch

[cisco-voip] Impact upon licensing in lab environment

2014-02-12 Thread Jeffrey Girard
Greetings all - My client recently purchased 2 x PAKs for CUCM servers. They have several physical host machines configured with ESX5. My understanding of the difference with CUCM 9 is the ELM. Licenses are no longer tied to the MAC but are tied to some random characters

Re: [cisco-voip] Impact upon licensing in lab environment

2014-02-12 Thread Matthew Loraditch
Subs don't talk to ELM. Only the Pub talks. You then have two possible setups, dedicated ELM/PLM and Colocated ELM/PLM with CUCM or Unity Connection. You also have one other scenario, rebuilding the Pub that you've mentioned. If you have the VM Resources considering all the changes you are

Re: [cisco-voip] Upgrades prohibited... *sigh*

2014-02-12 Thread Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
What was stated earlier is correct for you Lelio. Go back to the old docs, forget you ever heard of a thing called Jump upgrade, and move forward like you would have otherwise. Yes, you do need to apply your rehosted license AFTER the DRS restore. CSCtb86875 is the particular defect you'll

Re: [cisco-voip] Upgrades prohibited... *sigh*

2014-02-12 Thread Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
You shouldn't have to delete any subscribers. In order to do so you'll have to go through a lot of pain removing them from CM groups, etc. What you want to do will save time assuming everything works perfectly and no phone touches the new cluster until all the subs are installed and

[cisco-voip] S2 Netbox and CUCM

2014-02-12 Thread Ben Story
Has anyone ever done any integration between S2 Netbox security and Cisco IP phones? Specifically we would like to be able to have an extension or button on a phone open a door. -- Ben Story CCSP, CCNA, CCNA Wireless, CCDA ben.st...@gmail.com @ntwrk80 http://showbrain.blogspot.com

Re: [cisco-voip] Upgrades prohibited... *sigh*

2014-02-12 Thread Ted Nugent
Thanks Ryan The plan was to get the PUB 100% on 9.1.2, kill the old sub forcing the phones to the Pub (reordering CM group to make PUB primary just in case) and then rebuild the Sub from scratch on the same IP/host and/or build a second SUB and reorder the CM groups etc. The problem is we've been

Re: [cisco-voip] Upgrades prohibited... *sigh*

2014-02-12 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
If I had a (supported) VMWare environment to do this all in, I would have considered it. Unfortunately, timing did not allow for this. But it is a good idea. --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph

Re: [cisco-voip] UCS C series audio issues

2014-02-12 Thread Jason Aarons (AM)
If you put a monitor session (span/Wireshark) on the Switchport does it comes out of IPVMS garbled? From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Erick Bergquist Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 2:19 PM To: voip puck Subject: [cisco-voip] UCS C series audio issues

Re: [cisco-voip] UCS C series audio issues

2014-02-12 Thread Erick Bergquist
Thanks guys, I will check into those items. One system having this is effected by the bug id (8.5.1.11900-21, SU1) but the other was on 8.6.2a and we updated to 8.6.2a SU3 and same issue and the bug info states it should be fixed in 8.6.2a SU3 (23900). On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Brian

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX upgrade

2014-02-12 Thread Tanner Ezell
You shouldn't have much issue. If you've bought it you'll get it. Worst case might be requiring an email to licens...@cisco.com. On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Louis Koekemoer (ZA) louis.koekem...@dimensiondata.com wrote: Hi all, I have a question. We need to upgrade a client of

Re: [cisco-voip] S2 Netbox and CUCM

2014-02-12 Thread Ryan Huff
You should be able to setup a standard SIP trunk and point a route pattern at Netbox through the trunk. Then just put a SD to the RP on a phone. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 12, 2014, at 12:13 PM, Ben Story ben.st...@gmail.com wrote: Has anyone ever done any integration between S2 Netbox

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX upgrade

2014-02-12 Thread Ryan LaFountain (rlafount)
Hi Louis, If you ordered a 5.x to 9.x upgrade kit then the license that will be produced by that sales order will be for an upgrade 9.x license. This license is different than a 9.x fresh install license and will require the previous licenses to be present on the 9.x system (as the result of

Re: [cisco-voip] Impact upon licensing in lab environment

2014-02-12 Thread Jeffrey Girard
Ryan - What you say is interesting because it contradicts what the guy on my license TAC case specifically told me (I can provide you his name in a private email if you wish) Note that the licensing is tied to the eth0 mac address so if your ELM is a VM be sure it has a

[cisco-voip] Unity Connection - Call Handler bug re sync to subscriber

2014-02-12 Thread Dana Tong
Morning all, I recall reading about some kind of bug relating to the synchronisation of Unity Call Handlers within a cluster. I have searched the archives in markmail.org but cannot locate it. Does anyone know anything about this? Or has an idea? Cheers Dana

[cisco-voip] 8831 Conference phone call drops

2014-02-12 Thread Dave Wolgast
My customer has 3 beautiful new 8831 SIP conference phones running SIP load 9-3-3-5. The customer is running CUCM 9.1(2)SU1. When we make a call from the phone to either internal or PSTN destinations, the remote phone rings. When answered, we get about 1 second of rtp to the 8831, then it drops

Re: [cisco-voip] 8831 Conference phone call drops

2014-02-12 Thread Brian Meade (brmeade)
Dave, I'd suggest getting some packet captures and seeing what the traffic actually looks like. Brian From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dave Wolgast Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 5:56 PM To: Cisco VOIP Newsletter - puck.nether.net Subject: