[cisco-voip] CUCM 9.1

2014-12-01 Thread Sean Knight via cisco-voip
Hello, does anyone have a default List.xml file from CUCM 9.1? I may have overwritten mine with some new images that I tried to upload. I contacted TAC about it and they didn't have a List.xml file that I could have. I stored it in Desktops/640x480x24 and 640x480x24 folder. Now when I go

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 9.1

2014-12-01 Thread Antonis Kouloglou
Here Sean, BR Antonios On 01-Dec-14 17:29, Sean Knight via cisco-voip wrote: Hello, does anyone have a default List.xml file from CUCM 9.1? I may have overwritten mine with some new images that I tried to upload. I contacted TAC about it and they didn’t have a List.xml file that I could

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway - 3rd Party Border Recommendation

2014-12-01 Thread Brian Meade
I've done this before with a large Avaya setup. We had all of the UC stuff in a separate VRF and all soft clients had to come through an SBC for registration. We demoed Sipera and Acme. Sipera got the job done cheaper, but Acme scaled much better for us. I think CUCM supports Acme SBCs as well

[cisco-voip] Cisco Presence External Database Front End Application

2014-12-01 Thread Ryan Huff
I have had a few requests from folks for help with a front-end GUI application for the external PostgreSQL database that can be used with the Cisco Presence and IM server. Using something like PgAdmin is a great tool to use in an administrative function but not very user friendly for the non

[cisco-voip] UC integration with MS Office and Lync/MOC

2014-12-01 Thread george.hendrix
Hey Guys, We've been running Cisco UC integration version 8.X (CUCILYNC 8.6) for a while now and it works great with MS Office Communicator R2 and Office 2010, including the click to call add-in. Our MS folks are looking to migrate clients to MS Office 2013, but still use MOC R2. I can't

[cisco-voip] H245Interface Related Processes

2014-12-01 Thread Daniel Pagan
Folks: Hoping to get some insight on SDL process creation for H245... Scenario is three CUCM clusters communicating over ICTs. Call is routed from Cluster-1 to Cluster-2... then Cluster-2 to Cluster-3. Cluster-3 sends the H245 address port info via H225 ALERTING to Cluster-2, which then sends

Re: [cisco-voip] H245Interface Related Processes

2014-12-01 Thread Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
Short answer without confirming in the lab is yes, when I send you my H245 address I expect you to start a TCP connection to me on that port so we can start H245. -Ryan On Dec 1, 2014, at 5:12 PM, Daniel Pagan dpa...@fidelus.commailto:dpa...@fidelus.com wrote: Folks: Hoping to get some

[cisco-voip] NFAS t1

2014-12-01 Thread Charles Goldsmith
We are seeing an odd error on a migration from a Nortel setup over to an h323 setup. the error message after entering PRI 2 is *crsvr1(config-controller)#pri-group timeslots 1-24 nfas_ backup nfas_int 1 nfas_group 1* *%The Primary-group is already defined* *%The first definition of the

Re: [cisco-voip] NFAS t1

2014-12-01 Thread Charles Goldsmith
No, it's not, we cleared the pri-group's on both controllers by shutting down both voice-port and serial interfaces, removed the pri-group's, then added in correct config for NFAS. Going to open a TAC case in a bit on it. On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Brian Meade bmead...@vt.edu wrote: Is

Re: [cisco-voip] NFAS t1

2014-12-01 Thread Brian Meade
Is the pri-group already configured on that controller? If so, you'll need to shut down the voice-port, the serial interface, and then do no pri-group on the controller before re-defining the pri-group configuration. On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote:

Re: [cisco-voip] H245Interface Related Processes

2014-12-01 Thread Daniel Pagan
Thanks Ryan - that's what I was hoping to hear. I'll try to set this up in a lab to confirm with some simple ACLs. - Dan From: Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) [mailto:rratl...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 5:33 PM To: Daniel Pagan Cc: cisco-voip voyp list Subject: Re: [cisco-voip]

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway - 3rd Party Border Recommendation

2014-12-01 Thread NateCCIE
Expressway is the first thought, then CUBE Lineside proxy would be where to go for 3rd party. https://ciscocollab.wordpress.com/2014/04/08/cube-sip-lineside-phone-vpn-configuration/ From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brian Meade Sent: Monday,

Re: [cisco-voip] UC integration with MS Office and Lync/MOC

2014-12-01 Thread Scott Voll
Correct. The new cicilync is more like jabber. If you go to the o365 cloud it pretty much breaks everything. Good luck Scott On Monday, December 1, 2014, george.hend...@l-3com.com wrote: Hey Guys, We’ve been running Cisco UC integration version 8.X (CUCILYNC 8.6) for a while now and

Re: [cisco-voip] H245Interface Related Processes

2014-12-01 Thread Daniel Pagan
Hey Brian – hope you’re doing well. This is a difficult issue to reproduce so a pcap would be tricky to obtain. I’ll try and recreate the issue in a lab and see what results I get from an SDL process creation standpoint. Thanks! - Dan From: bmead...@gmail.com [mailto:bmead...@gmail.com] On

Re: [cisco-voip] Finisse -10.5 - cfadmin webpage doesnt open

2014-12-01 Thread Jason Aarons (AM)
What OS/Browser versions? If IE have you tried Compatibility mode? http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_CCE_Software_Compatibility_Matrix_for_10.5%28x%29#Unified_CCE_Release_10.5..281.29_Supported_Browsers From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway - 3rd Party Border Recommendation

2014-12-01 Thread Josh Warcop
TAC opened 3 bugs on my behalf related to CUBE line-side SIP proxy. Not including the documentation bugs that were opened. CUBE in that fashion has a few specific use cases and in my simple use case of replacing ASA phone-proxy it didn't hold up. Expressway is your go to solution for Jabber

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway - 3rd Party Border Recommendation

2014-12-01 Thread Walenta, Philip
I would second this opinion. I've done a lot of work with CUBE and it does not handle phone proxy well at all (or much when it comes to endpoint auth situations). VCS is your best best. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 1, 2014, at 8:55 PM, Josh Warcop j...@warcop.commailto:j...@warcop.com wrote: