Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

2015-01-19 Thread Tim Smith
Thanks Abhiram, I think that was the confusing part. We had seen it as advertised for 10.6 I was surprised when I activated Finesse on 10.6 and still saw the warning. Cheers, Tim From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh) Sent:

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

2015-01-19 Thread Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh)
Hi all, The support for mixed-mode is expected to be announced in the coming ways. It will be starting with 10.6 and the support can be claimed by installing a COP file. The details will come out soon, but in summary it will be in 10.6. Also, there will be a white-paper released regarding the

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

2015-01-19 Thread Matthew Loraditch
No CUIC is included and is just the replacement for HRC. The included version is essentially the same as HRC but web based. There is a premium option with more features available. That is, as expected, at a cost. Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA Network Engineer Direct Voice:

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

2015-01-19 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
That's great. We'll have to investigate the premium option. The HRC reports have been lacking from what I understand . Cheers. --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354

[cisco-voip] UCCX 9x Desktop Administrator Work Flow Configuration Reason Codes gone?

2015-01-19 Thread Jason Aarons (AM)
In UCCX 9x the 32-bit Desktop Administrator app is gone from Plug Ins. This means Reason Codes should now be configured from the top right drop down for Desktop Administrator ? Figure 5 page 28 does not match the Web GUI. It shows the old 32-bit application.

[cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

2015-01-19 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
In three parts... 1. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/customer-collaboration/unified-contact-center-express/eos-eol-notice-c51-733721.html 2.

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

2015-01-19 Thread Ryan LaFountain (rlafount)
Hi, Just to be clear, the CUIC that comes with UCCX is the standard CUIC license. You can’t upgrade the co-resident version of CUIC. You can buy premium CUIC (or use the NFR kit) and install CUIC standalone on a separate box in order to create custom report definitions (something you can’t do

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

2015-01-19 Thread Anthony Holloway
Does that mean Finesse is the way to go? Yes. And CUIC is the way to go for reporting. In fact, if you have not yet deployed a UCCX 10.5, then you may not know HRC already went away. On Mon Jan 19 2015 at 9:05:23 AM Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca wrote: Good catch on that! Does that mean

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

2015-01-19 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
Good catch on that! Does that mean Finesse is the way to go? --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 le...@uoguelph.ca www.uoguelph.ca/ccs Room 037, Animal Science and

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

2015-01-19 Thread Ryan LaFountain (rlafount)
Hi Lelio, The supported method is to integrate your standalone CUIC premium with the UCCX datasource for the purposes of building your report definitions. Then, you must export / import into UCCX and run them by logging in to the coresident UCCX instance. Thank you, Ryan LaFountain Unified

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

2015-01-19 Thread Mike
Just a FYI…10.6 will be your CAD to Finesse migration platform. It is the only supported co-resident version available for CAD Finesse to be activated at the same time. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Anthony Holloway Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

2015-01-19 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
Thanks Ryan. Do you have to do the export/import process? Does CUIC premium not support integrating with UCCX? --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 le...@uoguelph.ca

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Telepresence MX200 as standalone

2015-01-19 Thread Eric Pedersen
I see a CalSetupMode option under H.323 with an option for Direct. Ours is running in Gatekeeper mode but we have an SX20 with Direct dialing and it’s basically the same code. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Charles Goldsmith Sent: 17 January 2015

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 9x Desktop Administrator Work Flow Configuration Reason Codes gone?

2015-01-19 Thread Anthony Holloway
For reference, here is the latest 10.6 version and it shows that CDA is still there. [image: Inline image 1] On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Jason Aarons (AM) jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com wrote: In UCCX 9x the 32-bit Desktop Administrator app is gone from Plug Ins. This means Reason

[cisco-voip] Attendant Console Enterprise client 9.1.1.23 slow on blind transfer

2015-01-19 Thread Jason Aarons (AM)
Doing Blind Transfer Operator enters extension using 10 key and presses enter. It shows offhook then takes 5-10 seconds to transfer. Only occurs in client on blind transfer. Customer is using a headset for what that is worth.

[cisco-voip] Active Call OID

2015-01-19 Thread Willian Castello de Alcantara
Hello I have cisco router 2811 with 4 E1 ISDN PRI, configured with MGCP, can monitor active calls the first E1 (OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.10.19.1.1.9.1.3.0.0) and second E1 (OID 1.3.6.1. 4.1.9.10.19.1.1.9.1.3.0.1), but I could not find what would be the OID to monitor the other E1. With the command

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

2015-01-19 Thread Charles Goldsmith
Understood, but it keeps being repeated that it's in 10.6, which is not true as of yet. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_10_6/design/guide/UCCX_BK_CBB99111_00_cisco-unified-contact-center-express.pdf ​ We keep hoping, but it's not there

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

2015-01-19 Thread Josh Warcop
Both can be activated but it is a requirement that a team be on CAD or Finesse. Essentially giving a 'Team' based migration approach from CAD to Finesse. From: Lelio Fulgenzimailto:le...@uoguelph.ca Sent: ‎1/‎19/‎2015 2:04 PM To: voip

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 9x Desktop Administrator Work Flow Configuration Reason Codes gone?

2015-01-19 Thread Jason Aarons (AM)
Yes I forgot it was under the Desktop Suites. I was thinking that was just CAD/Supervisor ☺ From: avhollo...@gmail.com [mailto:avhollo...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Anthony Holloway Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 12:12 PM To: Jason Aarons (AM) Cc: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Subject:

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

2015-01-19 Thread Charles Goldsmith
Mike, this has been discussed previously, where is this documented? Per the 10.6 documentation, it is not supported for concurrent use. On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Mike mik...@msn.com wrote: Just a FYI…10.6 will be your CAD to Finesse migration platform. It is the only supported

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

2015-01-19 Thread Matthew Loraditch
Re: [cisco-voip] Consolidate two separate UCCX cluster and migrate to 9.x Look for Abhirams email on 12/18/14 at 9:21PMEST From that: “The support for concurrent use of CAD and Finesse for UCCX is expected to be announced in January (in all likelihood). Our internal testing has completed, but

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

2015-01-19 Thread Bernhard Albler
I would really be interested on how the migration is planned. While finesse is great, a lot of CAD customers are using integrations using keystroke macros or the local TCP socket option. I hope Cisco is cooking up something to get at least some of this functionality on Finesse out of the box.

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

2015-01-19 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
Thanks for everyone's help on this, especially the Cisco folk who are going back to check for docs and publishing dates, etc. I'm glad I posted this and started the conversation. --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS)

Re: [cisco-voip] Active Call OID

2015-01-19 Thread Brian Meade
Have you tried 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.10.19.1.1.9.1.3.1.0? On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Willian Castello de Alcantara williancaste...@yahoo.com.br wrote: Hello I have cisco router 2811 with 4 E1 ISDN PRI, configured with MGCP, can monitor active calls the first E1 (OID