[cisco-voip] periodic restarts still required for UCCx on RHEL?
My colleague opened up a TAC case for a problem we were having with UCCx. Turned out, a component had to be restarted. The TAC engineer was surprised our system was up and running for 150 days and suggested that we restart the servers periodically, say every 90 days. I thought this was going to go away with the upgrade from v7 to v9, moving away from Windows' memory issues, etc. Are people still finding they have to periodically reboot servers? Is this the official stance from the TAC? I mean, a yearly restart I can appreciate, but every 90 days? Yeeesh. --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 le...@uoguelph.ca www.uoguelph.ca/ccs Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] periodic restarts still required for UCCx on RHEL?
Hi Lelio, Please send me the case number…. I will follow up :) This is not the recommendation / stance of TAC. Thank you, Ryan LaFountain Unified Contact Center Cisco Services Direct: +1 919 392 9898 Hours: M - F 9:00am - 5:00pm Eastern Time From: Lelio Fulgenzi Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 9:52 AM To: Cisco VOIP Subject: [cisco-voip] periodic restarts still required for UCCx on RHEL? My colleague opened up a TAC case for a problem we were having with UCCx. Turned out, a component had to be restarted. The TAC engineer was surprised our system was up and running for 150 days and suggested that we restart the servers periodically, say every 90 days. I thought this was going to go away with the upgrade from v7 to v9, moving away from Windows' memory issues, etc. Are people still finding they have to periodically reboot servers? Is this the official stance from the TAC? I mean, a yearly restart I can appreciate, but every 90 days? Yeeesh. --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 le...@uoguelph.camailto:le...@uoguelph.ca www.uoguelph.ca/ccs Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[cisco-voip] CUCM 11.0 Release Date?
Anyone have any guesses for the date when CUCM 11.0 hits CCO? Its starting to show as the latest version in some places: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-version-11-0/model.html ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.0 Release Date?
It's due this summer. Watch for Rowan Trollope's keynote at Enterprise Connect later this month. Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA Network Engineer Direct Voice: 443.541.1518 Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | G+ -Original Message- From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of gen...@ucpenguin.com Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 11:41 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.0 Release Date? Anyone have any guesses for the date when CUCM 11.0 hits CCO? Its starting to show as the latest version in some places: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-version-11-0/model.html ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[cisco-voip] R: SIp Phones on CUCM10.5.2 don't revert to CUCM whengoin SRST fallback
I wait about 10 minuts before shut down the voice register global. - Messaggio originale - Da: Brian Meade bmead...@vt.edu Inviato: 03/03/2015 14:22 A: Alessandro Bertacco bertacco.alessan...@alice.it Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Oggetto: Re: [cisco-voip] SIp Phones on CUCM10.5.2 don't revert to CUCM whengoin SRST fallback You can check the keepalives via packet capture or CallManager traces. It shouldn't matter if you leave it blank. It should use the 120second enterprise parameter. How long do you let the phones try to go back to CUCM before shutting down the voice register global? On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:36 AM, Alessandro Bertacco bertacco.alessan...@alice.it wrote: Hi Brian, thank you for the answer. But if keepalive don't work, phones will unregister automaticalli, and it is not my case. How I can check keepalive from phones? In connection monitor duration under device pool I've leaved blank, I use the default value under Enterprise parameter that is set to 120. Do you think is better to specify the value also under device pool? Thank you very much. Regards Alessandro. Da: Brian Meade Inviato: 02/03/2015 21:57 A: Alessandro Bertacco Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Oggetto: Re: [cisco-voip] SIp Phones on CUCM10.5.2 don't revert to CUCM whengo in SRST fallback Here's what you're probably hitting for the 7800 series- https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCus18070 For the other models, do you see the phones having successful keepalives with CUCM before you disable voice register global? What do you have set for Connection Monitor Duration on the device pool? On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Alessandro Bertacco bertacco.alessan...@alice.it wrote: Hi All, I’ve this problem: all SIP phone are impacted from my issue. So, when connection to the CUCM is broken, all SIP phone correctly register on the SRST gateway version 15.4(3)M2 at the Branch Site, but when communication with CUCM go up again no one phone reconnect to the CUCM. To force that I need to remove voice register global command from the router, and wait about 2 minutes phones come back to the CUCM. Only SIP phone are affected from this issue. Phone used in my environment are: 7821 (sip78xx.10-2-1-12SR1-4) 9951 (sip9951.9-4-2-13) ATA190 (1.1.2 (005) Feb 6 2015) No Keepalive issue, because phone after removing voice register global connect again to the CUCM. Configuration of the SRST gateway are: ! voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 allow-connections h323 to sip allow-connections sip to h323 allow-connections sip to sip supplementary-service h450.12 fax protocol t38 version 0 ls-redundancy 0 hs-redundancy 0 fallback none modem passthrough nse codec g711ulaw h323 sip bind control source-interface GigabitEthernet0/1.20 bind media source-interface GigabitEthernet0/1.20 registrar server expires max 600 min 60 no silent-discard untrusted ! ! voice register global mode srst timeouts interdigit 7 system message Systema SRST Attivo max-dn 116 max-pool 58 ! voice register pool 1 registration-timer max 120 min 60 id network 192.168.101.0 mask 255.255.255.0 dtmf-relay rtp-nte sip-notify voice-class codec 1 ! Can you help me? Thank you regards Alessandro Bertacco ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] SIp Phones on CUCM10.5.2 don't revert to CUCM whengo in SRST fallback
You can check the keepalives via packet capture or CallManager traces. It shouldn't matter if you leave it blank. It should use the 120second enterprise parameter. How long do you let the phones try to go back to CUCM before shutting down the voice register global? On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:36 AM, Alessandro Bertacco bertacco.alessan...@alice.it wrote: Hi Brian, thank you for the answer. But if keepalive don't work, phones will unregister automaticalli, and it is not my case. How I can check keepalive from phones? In connection monitor duration under device pool I've leaved blank, I use the default value under Enterprise parameter that is set to 120. Do you think is better to specify the value also under device pool? Thank you very much. Regards Alessandro. -- Da: Brian Meade bmead...@vt.edu Inviato: 02/03/2015 21:57 A: Alessandro Bertacco bertacco.alessan...@alice.it Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Oggetto: Re: [cisco-voip] SIp Phones on CUCM10.5.2 don't revert to CUCM whengo in SRST fallback Here's what you're probably hitting for the 7800 series- https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCus18070 For the other models, do you see the phones having successful keepalives with CUCM before you disable voice register global? What do you have set for Connection Monitor Duration on the device pool? On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Alessandro Bertacco bertacco.alessan...@alice.it wrote: Hi All, I’ve this problem: all SIP phone are impacted from my issue. So, when connection to the CUCM is broken, all SIP phone correctly register on the SRST gateway version 15.4(3)M2 at the Branch Site, but when communication with CUCM go up again no one phone reconnect to the CUCM. To force that I need to remove voice register global command from the router, and wait about 2 minutes phones come back to the CUCM. Only SIP phone are affected from this issue. Phone used in my environment are: 7821 (sip78xx.10-2-1-12SR1-4) 9951 (sip9951.9-4-2-13) ATA190 (1.1.2 (005) Feb 6 2015) No Keepalive issue, because phone after removing voice register global connect again to the CUCM. Configuration of the SRST gateway are: ! voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 allow-connections h323 to sip allow-connections sip to h323 allow-connections sip to sip supplementary-service h450.12 fax protocol t38 version 0 ls-redundancy 0 hs-redundancy 0 fallback none modem passthrough nse codec g711ulaw h323 sip bind control source-interface GigabitEthernet0/1.20 bind media source-interface GigabitEthernet0/1.20 registrar server expires max 600 min 60 no silent-discard untrusted ! ! voice register global mode srst timeouts interdigit 7 system message Systema SRST Attivo max-dn 116 max-pool 58 ! voice register pool 1 registration-timer max 120 min 60 id network 192.168.101.0 mask 255.255.255.0 dtmf-relay rtp-nte sip-notify voice-class codec 1 ! Can you help me? Thank you regards Alessandro Bertacco ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[cisco-voip] errors with IOS transcoder
I am getting ready to add a VWIC3 T1 (and PRI) to my 2900 series ISR router running 15.3(2) and I'm trying to configure an IOS transcoder, I have PVDM3-64 (2 32 modules). When I get into the transcode sub configuration it gives me an Unrecognised Command error when trying to preference the codecs. What I am doing wrong? router(config)#dspfarm profile 6 transcode router(config-dspfarm-profile)#codec ? % Unrecognized command router(config-dspfarm-profile)#codec I've been reading that I may need to actually have the T1 card in the router first but I can't find anything to confirm that. I've been reading here: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/voice/cminterop/configuration/15-mt/dia-15-mt-book/vc-enh-confr-vgr.html#GUID-2E7DACC4-090A-4E89-BC1B-006E79BF0BC0 which seems to suggest that PVDM3 might not be able to support transcoding? Can anyone shed a little light my way? thank you ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[cisco-voip] SJC-This week
Anyone else in San Jose for the Collaboration festivities with Cisco this week? Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei [chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com Innovation happens on project squared -- http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/ Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] errors with IOS transcoder
Shouldn't need the card in there. Do you have dsp services dspfarm under the voice-card config? On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Barry Howser bhowser5...@gmail.com wrote: I am getting ready to add a VWIC3 T1 (and PRI) to my 2900 series ISR router running 15.3(2) and I'm trying to configure an IOS transcoder, I have PVDM3-64 (2 32 modules). When I get into the transcode sub configuration it gives me an Unrecognised Command error when trying to preference the codecs. What I am doing wrong? router(config)#dspfarm profile 6 transcode router(config-dspfarm-profile)#codec ? % Unrecognized command router(config-dspfarm-profile)#codec I've been reading that I may need to actually have the T1 card in the router first but I can't find anything to confirm that. I've been reading here: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/voice/cminterop/configuration/15-mt/dia-15-mt-book/vc-enh-confr-vgr.html#GUID-2E7DACC4-090A-4E89-BC1B-006E79BF0BC0 which seems to suggest that PVDM3 might not be able to support transcoding? Can anyone shed a little light my way? thank you ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] periodic restarts still required for UCCx on RHEL?
So I don’t believe in rebooting servers night to clear the cob webs. However if you have the right tools you could check memory and watch for memory leaks etc. However I like to patch/reboot at least once a year (or more often say quarterly) during a maintenance window. I like to know that a utils system restart will actually work. I’d rather testing it during a maintenance window then have a data center power loss on a weekday be the testing mechanism. Everything you get will be an opinion. Based on experience you can get burned either way ☺ It’s really about risk and mitigating risk. I once saw a trading floor unix server that had red tape 4ft around it, getting near it could cause a reboot costing millions. They were happy to never touch it. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 9:53 AM To: Cisco VOIP Subject: [cisco-voip] periodic restarts still required for UCCx on RHEL? My colleague opened up a TAC case for a problem we were having with UCCx. Turned out, a component had to be restarted. The TAC engineer was surprised our system was up and running for 150 days and suggested that we restart the servers periodically, say every 90 days. I thought this was going to go away with the upgrade from v7 to v9, moving away from Windows' memory issues, etc. Are people still finding they have to periodically reboot servers? Is this the official stance from the TAC? I mean, a yearly restart I can appreciate, but every 90 days? Yeeesh. --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 le...@uoguelph.camailto:le...@uoguelph.ca www.uoguelph.ca/ccshttp://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 itevomcid ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] errors with IOS transcoder
So in order to configure the transcoder, you must first initialize the DSP Farm. If you plan to use the dspfarm with your T1 card, then yes, you would need the card installed first. If you are not going to use the dspfarm with your T1 card, then you need to initialize the dspfarm on the voice-card that the DSP shows up on (doing a show inventory should reveal that to you). Thanks, Ryan Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 12:07:25 -0500 From: bhowser5...@gmail.com To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] errors with IOS transcoder I am getting ready to add a VWIC3 T1 (and PRI) to my 2900 series ISR router running 15.3(2) and I'm trying to configure an IOS transcoder, I have PVDM3-64 (2 32 modules). When I get into the transcode sub configuration it gives me an Unrecognised Command error when trying to preference the codecs. What I am doing wrong? router(config)#dspfarm profile 6 transcode router(config-dspfarm-profile)#codec ? % Unrecognized command router(config-dspfarm-profile)#codec I've been reading that I may need to actually have the T1 card in the router first but I can't find anything to confirm that. I've been reading here: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/voice/cminterop/configuration/15-mt/dia-15-mt-book/vc-enh-confr-vgr.html#GUID-2E7DACC4-090A-4E89-BC1B-006E79BF0BC0 which seems to suggest that PVDM3 might not be able to support transcoding? Can anyone shed a little light my way? thank you ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] SRV records for Jabber/Telepresence/MRA
Here is a lab guide from Cisco dcloud, that goes through a good portion of it. https://dcloud-rtp-web-1.cisco.com/dCloud/docs/Documents/pa_for_mm_video_10.5_v1/PA_for_MM_Video_Lab_Guide.pdf Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei [chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com Innovation happens on project squared -- http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/ Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Charles Goldsmith Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 1:55 PM To: Andy Cc: Cisco VOIP Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SRV records for Jabber/Telepresence/MRA You definitely do not want _cisco-uds and _cuplogin on the outside from my understanding. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/unified-communications/expressway-series/117811-configure-vcs-00.html#anc10 Just collab-edge on the outside, plus any b2b/federation records you need. On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Andy andy.ca...@gmail.commailto:andy.ca...@gmail.com wrote: I seem to have got myself into a stew and can’t seem to get in my mind what I need to do with SRV records. I’m trying to deploy Expressway MRA and B2B. We currently have an external DNS domain and a different internal domain. For our internal domain which I’ll call andy.local we have the following SRV records setup. _cisco-uds._tcp.andy.local 8443 10 10 sub1.andy.local _cisco-uds._tcp.andy.local 8443 10 10 sub2.andy.local _cuplogin._tcp.andy.local 8443 10 10 cups1.andy.local For our External domain which I’ll call andy.comhttp://andy.com _h323cs._tcp.andy.comhttp://tcp.andy.com 1720 10 10 videoconf.andy.comhttp://videoconf.andy.com _h323ls._udp.andy.comhttp://udp.andy.com 1719 10 10 videoconf.andy.comhttp://videoconf.andy.com _sip._tcp.andy.comhttp://tcp.andy.com 5060 10 10 videoconf.andy.comhttp://videoconf.andy.com _sip._udp.andy.comhttp://udp.andy.com 5060 10 10 videoconf.andy.comhttp://videoconf.andy.com _sips._tcp.andy.comhttp://tcp.andy.com 5061 10 10 videoconf.andy.comhttp://videoconf.andy.com _turn._udp.andy.comhttp://udp.andy.com 3478 10 10 videoconf.andy.comhttp://videoconf.andy.com _collab-edge.tls.andy.comhttp://collab-edge.tls.andy.com 8443 10 10 videoconf.andy.comhttp://videoconf.andy.com We have an A Record for videoconf.andy.comhttp://videoconf.andy.com which points to our public address. As it doesn’t work I raised a TAC case and the engineer changed my errors in the config, but also says I need to add _cisco-uds._tcp and _cuplogin._tcp for our external domain. now I’m really confused as I thought that Jabber uses the DNS records to determine which side of the firewall it was by the dns records it receives when you boot the app. Also videoconf.andy.comhttp://videoconf.andy.com needs to be changed to match the FQDN of the VCSe or Expressway Edge server. We are running CUCM 9.1.2 with a single expressway-c and expressway-e running x8.5 TIA Andy andy.ca...@gmail.commailto:andy.ca...@gmail.com ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[cisco-voip] Understanding SIP Traces document
Hello! One of my guys has been referencing a document on the cisco support forums called Understanding SIP Traces: https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/113271/understanding-sip-traces but now we are getting Access Denied, anyone know if this went away on purpose? I actually never got a chance to read it, he just asked me about it today, he seemed to find it useful. Thanks! Ed -- Ed Leatherman ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] MediaSense Interfaces
While it doesn't help you with your current query, I can tell you that we have lots of roadmap items on the Search and Play interface. The MediaSense team never intended the Search and Play application to be used on a regular basis. It was originally built as a reference application for testing the APIs. We always intended for partners to fill in the gaps. We have found, that customers want Search and Play to be a very functional and useful interface and so are roadmap is starting to reflect that now. Stay tuned for 11.0 and 11.X and hopefully you will see some improvements. MediaSense probably won't ever tackle analytics or advanced features like that, but we do want to build MediaSense to tackle most of our customer's needs. +Chris TME - Unity Connection and MediaSense -Original Message- From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of gen...@ucpenguin.com Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 10:47 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] MediaSense Interfaces I'm looking for a recommendation on a MediaSense interface that provides access to call recordings. It would need to be able to support multiple MediaSense clusters, other QM features aren't a requirement. Live monitoring would be a plus, but not a requirement. It's rather frustrating that MediaSense fails to include a reasonable user interface. I get the protection of existing partner businesses, but there has to be a better balance than the cumbersome agent monitoring included with CAD and a full blown QM tool. Surely there has to be something out there I'm over looking that isn't $200+ per seat for these rather basic features. ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] periodic restarts still required for UCCx on RHEL?
Thanks everyone! Sent from my iPhone On Mar 3, 2015, at 1:47 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com wrote: So I don’t believe in rebooting servers night to clear the cob webs. However if you have the right tools you could check memory and watch for memory leaks etc. However I like to patch/reboot at least once a year (or more often say quarterly) during a maintenance window. I like to know that a utils system restart will actually work. I’d rather testing it during a maintenance window then have a data center power loss on a weekday be the testing mechanism. Everything you get will be an opinion. Based on experience you can get burned either way J It’s really about risk and mitigating risk. I once saw a trading floor unix server that had red tape 4ft around it, getting near it could cause a reboot costing millions. They were happy to never touch it. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 9:53 AM To: Cisco VOIP Subject: [cisco-voip] periodic restarts still required for UCCx on RHEL? My colleague opened up a TAC case for a problem we were having with UCCx. Turned out, a component had to be restarted. The TAC engineer was surprised our system was up and running for 150 days and suggested that we restart the servers periodically, say every 90 days. I thought this was going to go away with the upgrade from v7 to v9, moving away from Windows' memory issues, etc. Are people still finding they have to periodically reboot servers? Is this the official stance from the TAC? I mean, a yearly restart I can appreciate, but every 90 days? Yeeesh. --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 le...@uoguelph.ca www.uoguelph.ca/ccs Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 itevomcid ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] SRV records for Jabber/Telepresence/MRA
Nate, we recently had TAC have us put cuplogin back in for a 10.5 setup. The customer didn't have DNS on all of their phone vlan's, and we had to go back to IP on the CUCM server names. Because of this, we had issues getting Jabber to login and not spit out cert problems. Removing the uds-cisco srv record and putting cuplogin back in resolved the problem. On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:44 PM, NateCCIE natec...@gmail.com wrote: Cuplogin is deprecated and only needed with old clients. Get rid Of that. And you are correct, you don't need the uds or Cuplogin externally. Xmpp Federation will not work through expressway with different internal and external domains. Michael white has a blog out there on split domain mra. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 3, 2015, at 2:15 PM, Andy andy.ca...@gmail.com wrote: I seem to have got myself into a stew and can’t seem to get in my mind what I need to do with SRV records. I’m trying to deploy Expressway MRA and B2B. We currently have an external DNS domain and a different internal domain. For our internal domain which I’ll call andy.local we have the following SRV records setup. _cisco-uds._tcp.andy.local 8443 10 10 sub1.andy.local _cisco-uds._tcp.andy.local 8443 10 10 sub2.andy.local _cuplogin._tcp.andy.local 8443 10 10 cups1.andy.local For our External domain which I’ll call andy.com _h323cs._tcp.andy.com 1720 10 10 videoconf.andy.com _h323ls._udp.andy.com 1719 10 10 videoconf.andy.com _sip._tcp.andy.com 5060 10 10 videoconf.andy.com _sip._udp.andy.com 5060 10 10 videoconf.andy.com _sips._tcp.andy.com 5061 10 10 videoconf.andy.com _turn._udp.andy.com 3478 10 10 videoconf.andy.com _collab-edge.tls.andy.com 8443 10 10 videoconf.andy.com We have an A Record for videoconf.andy.com which points to our public address. As it doesn’t work I raised a TAC case and the engineer changed my errors in the config, but also says I need to add _cisco-uds._tcp and _cuplogin._tcp for our external domain. now I’m really confused as I thought that Jabber uses the DNS records to determine which side of the firewall it was by the dns records it receives when you boot the app. Also videoconf.andy.com needs to be changed to match the FQDN of the VCSe or Expressway Edge server. We are running CUCM 9.1.2 with a single expressway-c and expressway-e running x8.5 TIA Andy andy.ca...@gmail.com ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] SRV records for Jabber/Telepresence/MRA
Cuplogin is deprecated and only needed with old clients. Get rid Of that. And you are correct, you don't need the uds or Cuplogin externally. Xmpp Federation will not work through expressway with different internal and external domains. Michael white has a blog out there on split domain mra. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 3, 2015, at 2:15 PM, Andy andy.ca...@gmail.com wrote: I seem to have got myself into a stew and can’t seem to get in my mind what I need to do with SRV records. I’m trying to deploy Expressway MRA and B2B. We currently have an external DNS domain and a different internal domain. For our internal domain which I’ll call andy.local we have the following SRV records setup. _cisco-uds._tcp.andy.local 8443 10 10 sub1.andy.local _cisco-uds._tcp.andy.local 8443 10 10 sub2.andy.local _cuplogin._tcp.andy.local 8443 10 10 cups1.andy.local For our External domain which I’ll call andy.com _h323cs._tcp.andy.com 1720 10 10 videoconf.andy.com _h323ls._udp.andy.com 1719 10 10 videoconf.andy.com _sip._tcp.andy.com 5060 10 10 videoconf.andy.com _sip._udp.andy.com 5060 10 10 videoconf.andy.com _sips._tcp.andy.com 5061 10 10 videoconf.andy.com _turn._udp.andy.com 3478 10 10 videoconf.andy.com _collab-edge.tls.andy.com 8443 10 10 videoconf.andy.com We have an A Record for videoconf.andy.com which points to our public address. As it doesn’t work I raised a TAC case and the engineer changed my errors in the config, but also says I need to add _cisco-uds._tcp and _cuplogin._tcp for our external domain. now I’m really confused as I thought that Jabber uses the DNS records to determine which side of the firewall it was by the dns records it receives when you boot the app. Also videoconf.andy.com needs to be changed to match the FQDN of the VCSe or Expressway Edge server. We are running CUCM 9.1.2 with a single expressway-c and expressway-e running x8.5 TIA Andy andy.ca...@gmail.com ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] SRV records for Jabber/Telepresence/MRA
That does work, but it seems the cool service profile stuff doesn't work the same when you use Cuplogin. Getting DNS for the phones should be pursued. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 3, 2015, at 5:55 PM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Nate, we recently had TAC have us put cuplogin back in for a 10.5 setup. The customer didn't have DNS on all of their phone vlan's, and we had to go back to IP on the CUCM server names. Because of this, we had issues getting Jabber to login and not spit out cert problems. Removing the uds-cisco srv record and putting cuplogin back in resolved the problem. On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:44 PM, NateCCIE natec...@gmail.com wrote: Cuplogin is deprecated and only needed with old clients. Get rid Of that. And you are correct, you don't need the uds or Cuplogin externally. Xmpp Federation will not work through expressway with different internal and external domains. Michael white has a blog out there on split domain mra. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 3, 2015, at 2:15 PM, Andy andy.ca...@gmail.com wrote: I seem to have got myself into a stew and can’t seem to get in my mind what I need to do with SRV records. I’m trying to deploy Expressway MRA and B2B. We currently have an external DNS domain and a different internal domain. For our internal domain which I’ll call andy.local we have the following SRV records setup. _cisco-uds._tcp.andy.local 8443 10 10 sub1.andy.local _cisco-uds._tcp.andy.local 8443 10 10 sub2.andy.local _cuplogin._tcp.andy.local 8443 10 10 cups1.andy.local For our External domain which I’ll call andy.com _h323cs._tcp.andy.com 1720 10 10 videoconf.andy.com _h323ls._udp.andy.com 1719 10 10 videoconf.andy.com _sip._tcp.andy.com 5060 10 10 videoconf.andy.com _sip._udp.andy.com 5060 10 10 videoconf.andy.com _sips._tcp.andy.com 5061 10 10 videoconf.andy.com _turn._udp.andy.com 3478 10 10 videoconf.andy.com _collab-edge.tls.andy.com 8443 10 10 videoconf.andy.com We have an A Record for videoconf.andy.com which points to our public address. As it doesn’t work I raised a TAC case and the engineer changed my errors in the config, but also says I need to add _cisco-uds._tcp and _cuplogin._tcp for our external domain. now I’m really confused as I thought that Jabber uses the DNS records to determine which side of the firewall it was by the dns records it receives when you boot the app. Also videoconf.andy.com needs to be changed to match the FQDN of the VCSe or Expressway Edge server. We are running CUCM 9.1.2 with a single expressway-c and expressway-e running x8.5 TIA Andy andy.ca...@gmail.com ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
