Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 10.6 Standard CUIC Concurrent Peak Call Report

2015-03-16 Thread Anthony Holloway
How does the Stock Unified CCX Historical System License Utilization Hourly Report (and then switch it to the line chart) work for you? I like it because it shows my busy hour port usage. On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:36 PM Andrew Grech agrec...@gmail.com wrote: Hey All, Within the standard

Re: [cisco-voip] Transcoding question

2015-03-16 Thread Daniel Pagan
For clarity, by “higher bandwidth codec” I meant to say higher bit-rate codec, or codec of higher bandwidth consumption. - Dan From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Daniel Pagan Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 9:08 PM To: Ryan Huff; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

[cisco-voip] Fwd: UCCX 10.6 Standard CUIC Concurrent Peak Call Report

2015-03-16 Thread Andrew Grech
-- Forwarded message -- From: Andrew Grech agrec...@gmail.com Date: Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:24 PM Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 10.6 Standard CUIC Concurrent Peak Call Report To: Anthony Holloway avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com Thanks Anthony, Its close but no cigar.. For this

Re: [cisco-voip] Transcoding question

2015-03-16 Thread Daniel Pagan
Hey Ryan how’s it going? Transcoder allocated by CUCM comes from the side using a higher bandwidth codec, regardless if it’s the calling or called party, with the intention to avoid streaming a high bandwidth consuming codec over a WAN connection – keeping it local to the LAN. Of course, this

Re: [cisco-voip] Transcoding question

2015-03-16 Thread Ryan Huff
Thanks Dainel! I probably knew that at some point, but I couldn't remember for the life of me! Makes total sense. Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Daniel Pagan dpa...@fidelus.com Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 09:16 PM To: Daniel Pagan dpa...@fidelus.com,Ryan Huff

[cisco-voip] Transcoding question

2015-03-16 Thread Ryan Huff
When xcoding is required in the call setup, which side is transcoded? The called party or the calling party? Thanks___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] UCCX 10.6 Standard CUIC Concurrent Peak Call Report

2015-03-16 Thread Andrew Grech
Hey All, Within the standard version of CUIC can some give me some guidance on how to create a peak concurrent call volume report? I can do lots of summary reports.. Many thanks Andrew ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] vMotion w/o Shared Storage

2015-03-16 Thread Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
However, I think this is getting close to the just because you can, doesn’t mean you should. Dennis, you must have had the same VCP trainer I did, that was a frequent refrain. If you want to go really cheap load up a host with HDDs and run a FreeNAS VM on it. Obviously for testing purposes

[cisco-voip] Win 7 64-bit not supported with CUCM 10.5

2015-03-16 Thread Jason Aarons (AM)
A customer pointed out that Cisco doesn’t support Windows 7 64-bit for Self Care Portal in 10.5. Seems odd. ++ Guess we are out of luck. All of our PC’s are running Windows 7 64bit.

Re: [cisco-voip] Win 7 64-bit not supported with CUCM 10.5

2015-03-16 Thread Kevin Przybylowski
This sounds like a bug or maybe the user doesn’t have the required roles to access the page? Windows 7 64 bit certainly works fine with every version through 10.6 that I have tested with. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (AM) Sent:

Re: [cisco-voip] Win 7 64-bit not supported with CUCM 10.5

2015-03-16 Thread NateCCIE
No one really uses the 64 bit browsers. This is browsers not Oss. https://www.java.com/en/download/faq/java_win64bit.xml From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (AM) Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 7:28 AM To: cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Win 7 64-bit not supported with CUCM 10.5

2015-03-16 Thread Kevin Przybylowski
Ya it’s a common topic… “why isn’t Windows XP supported with CAD/Finesse?!”… uh because Microsoft doesn’t! though it still works. Upgrade your desktops! From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Anthony Holloway Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 10:47 AM To: Jason

Re: [cisco-voip] Singlewire Remote Phone Control - Now Free!

2015-03-16 Thread Scott Voll
and what it supports now is all it will support. They are not continuing the product moving forward. Great product. have used it for years. Call to see if they were going to support the 8861 as that is our new standardized model and found out it's not getting anything new. Guess we will look

Re: [cisco-voip] Win 7 64-bit not supported with CUCM 10.5

2015-03-16 Thread Jason Aarons (AM)
It’s the fact the Cisco doesn’t support Window 7 64-bit is a concern to the customer. Only 32-bit. From: Kevin Przybylowski [mailto:kev...@advancedtsg.com] Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 9:35 AM To: Jason Aarons (AM); cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Subject: RE: Win 7 64-bit not supported

Re: [cisco-voip] SBC/SIP Trunk Design queries

2015-03-16 Thread Terry Cheema
Thanks Roger and everyone for the replies, its been very helpful. Terry Sent from my iPhone On 14 Mar 2015, at 11:27 pm, Roger Wiklund roger.wikl...@gmail.com wrote: We use Acme 3820 with our UCaas platform. Behind it we serve Cisco, Mitel, Avaya and Lync PBX:es. You can't go wrong with

Re: [cisco-voip] vMotion w/o Shared Storage

2015-03-16 Thread Charles Goldsmith
This is exactly what I have for my home lab, and iscsi mounts for the datastores. It works really well. On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) rratl...@cisco.com wrote: Dennis, you must have had the same VCP trainer I did, that was a frequent refrain. If you want to go

[cisco-voip] Setting admin password on SX20 registered to CUCM - Can't set from CUCM device page

2015-03-16 Thread Brian V
I have CUCM 10.5.2 SX20 with 7.3.1 code. SX20 is registered successfully to CUCM. I can change the display name, the extension etc.. apply changes from CUCM and the endpoint learns of the changes and looks correct. So I'm guessing its properly downloading its config file and applying settings.

Re: [cisco-voip] ParkingLotD and SNR | Leaked Calls on StationD

2015-03-16 Thread Daniel Pagan
Quick follow-up on this one... The case was routed to the BU. Hopefully I'll have a defect to share soon. Another finding - I ran a handful more tests and looks like any cause for DA failure results in this problem for SNR users, whether that means a mistyped remote destination number, the

[cisco-voip] CUPS Server 8.6.5 and Jabber Single Sign On with AD FS

2015-03-16 Thread Jason Aarons (AM)
Jabber for Windows deployment will be for chat and phone the CUCM/CUPS is 8.6.5 Customer is migrating from OCS. Their concern is around Single Sign-on and not losing functionality. They currently have CUCM/CUPS 8.6. They want Jabber to login with the same behavior as OCS (Single Sign-on). They

Re: [cisco-voip] CUPS Server 8.6.5 and Jabber Single Sign On with AD FS

2015-03-16 Thread Brian Meade
Unfortunately you're stuck there. I'm running into a similar issue right now. Using Webex Connect services right now as a workaround for SSO support until they can upgrade to 10.x for ADFS support. If they don't want to upgrade and need on-prem, they'll have to deploy OpenAM. On Mon, Mar 16,