Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 9.1 - DRF not working

2015-05-28 Thread Charles Goldsmith
Check RTMT for what errors you are seeing, call TAC with that info. Also, while in RTMT, set it up to email you for alerts, so you know when your backups do not work. On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Reto Gassmann v...@mrga.ch wrote: hello group Last weekend we rebooted our CUCM 9.1 cluster.

Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest | VG310/320/350 config

2015-05-28 Thread Lokesh Lal
I agree Document says we need it ,maybe you have it configured as MGCP, as Matt pointed out https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11824511/ucl-and-vg248#3942945

Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest | VG310/320/350 config

2015-05-28 Thread Charles Goldsmith
Yes, I do have them all configured as MGCP. I've yet to use SCCP with the analog gateways anywhere. On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Lokesh Lal lokesh_...@yahoo.co.in wrote: I agree Document says we need it ,maybe you have it configured as MGCP, as Matt pointed out

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 9.1 - DRF not working

2015-05-28 Thread Erick
Sounds like the IPSec certificates are not correct. This is issue with drf Working sometimes - google search should find the solution. Later tonight when I have more time I'll find the article and posts with fix. Sent from my iPhone On May 28, 2015, at 5:13 PM, Charles Goldsmith

[cisco-voip] Conf Phone?

2015-05-28 Thread Jason Aarons (AM)
Have an exec that uses a room that can have multiple conferences at one time on different phones. He would like the nearest microphone on the conference phone to be the only one that pics up sounds to mitigate some of the background noise of the other calls in the room. Aware of any 3rd

Re: [cisco-voip] Conf Phone?

2015-05-28 Thread Wes Sisk (wsisk)
i’m not aware of a phone with a workable mic profile. i did some work with cardioid mics in another life and those seem to fit the bill. a bit of a stretch but what about having multiple soft clients with cardioid mic inputs? one iPhone or iPad per conference with attached mic -w On May 28,

Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest | VG310/320/350 config

2015-05-28 Thread Lokesh Lal
If u check cucm 9 and above , each port/analog requires essential ucl licence.  Check utilisation report Sent from Samsung Mobile Original message From: Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org Date: 26/05/2015 22:35 (GMT+05:30) To: Lokesh Lal lokesh_...@yahoo.co.in Cc:

Re: [cisco-voip] Caller order when presented to hunt groups

2015-05-28 Thread Nick
Hi Brian Yes, the same members of line group1 are also in line group 2 plus a couple of extra lines. So are you saying that I would need to have two lines configured on the phones Line 1 in LG1 and Line 2 in LG2 for it to work correctly? Regards Nick On 27 May 2015 at 16:19, Brian Meade

Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest | VG310/320/350 config

2015-05-28 Thread Charles Goldsmith
This is on a 10.5 system: http://i.imgur.com/8Vp2oOR.png We have a vg350, vg320, vg310 and three vg224's all configured. We also have 285 phones configured, about half do not have users associated due to public space phones. I'm not seeing the license requirement here. On Thu, May 28, 2015 at

Re: [cisco-voip] Changing DNS entries in Call Manager 9.1.2.10000-28

2015-05-28 Thread Eric Pedersen
We switched to IP addresses for our CUCM server entries and haven’t had any application problems. Jabber appears to use the hostnames set in the “UC Server” settings not the System-Server settings. Windows accepts IP addresses in certificate Subject Alt Name attributes too. We had an issue at

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM DNS/CTL configuration - follow-up

2015-05-28 Thread Ed Leatherman
It's not a tomcat-trust cert though, the docs (and expressway) say it needs to go in the callmanager-trust On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: Just restart Tomcat On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Ed Leatherman ealeather...@gmail.com wrote: Good

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM DNS/CTL configuration - follow-up

2015-05-28 Thread Ed Leatherman
Good morning! Cert related question - think I know the answer but I dont see it explicitly stated so figured I'd ask. I need to add the CA cert for my expressway-C to call manager as a callmanager-trust cert - do I need to reboot the call manager service for this to take effect? No forced phone

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM DNS/CTL configuration - follow-up

2015-05-28 Thread Charles Goldsmith
Just restart Tomcat On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Ed Leatherman ealeather...@gmail.com wrote: Good morning! Cert related question - think I know the answer but I dont see it explicitly stated so figured I'd ask. I need to add the CA cert for my expressway-C to call manager as a

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM DNS/CTL configuration - follow-up

2015-05-28 Thread Charles Goldsmith
I'm sorry, I read your email too quickly, and you are probably correct. I've only done 3rd party certs so far with MRA, so I've only had to restart Tomcat with UCM. On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Ed Leatherman ealeather...@gmail.com wrote: It's not a tomcat-trust cert though, the docs (and

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM DNS/CTL configuration - follow-up

2015-05-28 Thread Brian Meade
I've seen it work most of the time just adding the CallManager-trust. On one occasion, I did have to restart the CallManager service for it to take affect. Make sure to upload to every node. You also shouldn't see any phone reboots for adding a CallManager-trust. That would only be in the case

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM DNS/CTL configuration - follow-up

2015-05-28 Thread Jason Burns
Brian, since it's a trust cert you shouldn't need to upload it to every node. The certificate replication process I talked about previously in this thread handles putting the trust cert on all CUCM servers. Also - since it's a trust cert you're right - no resets of phones anywhere. Since this is

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM DNS/CTL configuration - follow-up

2015-05-28 Thread Ed Leatherman
Looks like I need to get my Tomcat certs signed before I can test this out after all.. the CN for the tomcat and callmanager certs (self-signed) right now on my cluster are the same and expressway won't setup the initial connection. The good news is I can get our internal CA to sign them which is