Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 4331 Voice router

So it looks like it was ordered correctly however the PVDM chip is the same chip that goes in the NIM. So cisco put it on the MB instead of how it was ordered on the NIM. I believe I should be able to just move it from the MB to the NIM. On Mar 10, 2016 5:19 PM, "Jose Colon II" wrote: > Thanks gu

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 4331 Voice router

Thanks guys. I think the thing that is getting me is that it was bought without the PVDM on the NIM. Have to go back and adjust hardware. On Mar 10, 2016 5:17 PM, "Ryan Huff" wrote: > Jose, > > > You'll be doing essentially the same thing as the G2s; IOS-XE just changes > up the syntax a bit. Hav

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 4331 Voice router

Jose, You'll be doing essentially the same thing as the G2s; IOS-XE just changes up the syntax a bit. Have a look at: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/access/interfaces/NIM/software/configuration/guide/ConfT1E1NIM.html, that should get you started (pay particular attention to the c

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 4331 Voice router

Main thing is the DSP for the T1 has to be physically on the T1 NIM. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jose Colon II Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 3:47 PM To: Cisco VOIP Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco 4331 Voice router I am setting up a 4331 for voice

[cisco-voip] Cisco 4331 Voice router

I am setting up a 4331 for voice for the first time and was hoping to find one of you with a working config. Looks like there are some differences from the 2900 services and more specifically around the DSP's. I have a Cisco ONE licensed 4331 with a T1 card and a 2 port FXO card. Thanks in advance

Re: [cisco-voip] increasing VM virtual memory?

I've increased the UCM/CUC 10.x VMs to 6 GB to prevent memory issues and haven't had any problems.I keep the bug below folded on some paper tucked away in my wallet just in case. https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuo38244 *increase the threshold for LowAvailableVirtualMemory fro

[cisco-voip] unsubscribe

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail message from Delphi Technology, Inc. is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This e-mail may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable

Re: [cisco-voip] 8.6 SW_Feature License

INCREMENT SW_FEATURE just lists the major CUCM version for the cluster. INCREMENT CCM_NODE sets how many nodes you can have in the cluster. License should only have the License MAC of the CUCM publisher. On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Adam Piasecki wrote: > I hate cisco licensing, venting do

Re: [cisco-voip] 8.6 SW_Feature License

More info- http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/8_0_2/ccmfeat/fsgd-802-cm/fslicense.html On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Brian Meade wrote: > INCREMENT SW_FEATURE just lists the major CUCM version for the cluster. > > INCREMENT CCM_NODE sets how many nodes you can have

Re: [cisco-voip] 8.6 SW_Feature License

You didn't say what product you're talking about, so I'm going assume you're talking about CUCM. My CUCM 8.6 cluster only has one, for the publisher's MAC address. So I think you only need one. Interestingly my license file is actually for "8.0" not for 8.6. Hmm. Licensing for 8.6 is the absol

[cisco-voip] 8.6 SW_Feature License

I hate cisco licensing, venting done.. What is the purpose of a INCREMENT SW_FEATURE license, on a New 8.6 install. Also do I need a INCREMENT SW_FEATURE license for each node or just one for the entire cluster. Thanks, Adam ___ cisco-voip mail

Re: [cisco-voip] increasing VM virtual memory?

Nick, It's actually pretty common, when doing upgrades, that minimum RAM requirements go up, and you have to increase the allocated RAM and reservation. Example: CUCM 10x 2,500 OVA requires 4GB RAM

[cisco-voip] increasing VM virtual memory?

Are there any negative issues that arise from increasing the RAM on a CUCM 10.0 or CUC 10.5 VM? I haven't ever seen anyone talk about it. I assume that is because there is typically an underlying issue that should be resolved rather than just increasing RAM. Does anyone have any input on this?