Re: [cisco-voip] Not supported I'm sure..... but what do you think?

2016-10-25 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
I've done something similar and plan to do it again. However, in my situation it was a completely isolated network. No connection what so ever. But I like your idea of NAT'ing so you can still access live network resources as required, like AD, NTP, etc. I may, if the network team supports it, a

Re: [cisco-voip] Not supported I'm sure..... but what do you think?

2016-10-25 Thread Ryan Huff
Matthew is correct, copying is listed as "Supported with Caveats" at: http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Communications_VMware_Requirements; The caveat being found at http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Communications_VMware_Requirements#Copy_Virtual_Machine The VM needs to be powered dow

Re: [cisco-voip] Not supported I'm sure..... but what do you think?

2016-10-25 Thread Matthew Loraditch
I can’t see any reason it wouldn’t be supported honestly. Offline Cloning is allowed for migration/backup purposes. I actually did the NAT thing to do my BE5k to 6K conversions. Kept both systems online. The only thing I can think to be thought of is ITLs, does an upgrade do anything that you’d

Re: [cisco-voip] Not supported I'm sure..... but what do you think?

2016-10-25 Thread Tommy Schlotterer
I do a similar, but supported process. I take DRS backups and then restore on servers in a sandbox VLAN. Works well. Make sure you check your phone firmware and upgrade to the current version before the cutover or all your phones will have to upgrade on cutover. Also make sure you don’t change

[cisco-voip] Not supported I'm sure..... but what do you think?

2016-10-25 Thread Scott Voll
So my co-worker and I are thinking about upgrades. we are currently on 10.5 train and thinking about the 11.5 train. What would be your thoughts about taking a clone of every VM. CM, UC, UCCx, CER, PLM, placing it on another vlan with the same IP's. NAT it as it goes onto your network so it ha