[cisco-voip] Skype for business Cloud Connector installation problem

2016-10-27 Thread Claiton Campos
Hi all, I´m trying to set up a cloud connector edition in my environment to link the office 365 with my CUCM via sip trunk, but during install the CCE i get the error. Create-BaseVM : The configuration of the operating system has taken longer than usual. Please check the virtual machine network co

Re: [cisco-voip] Not supported I'm sure..... but what do you think?

2016-10-27 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
This is exactly the reason I did my upgrades off line and swapped out the hardware during the maintenance window. That being said, it still took some time to do all the swapping. Just looking at my notes from the last upgrade and it was about 2-3 hours. Much of that was due to the amount of t

Re: [cisco-voip] Not supported I'm sure..... but what do you think?

2016-10-27 Thread Scott Voll
I'm going to start with, we don't have a complex deployment. 2 CM 1 UC 1 UCCX 1 CER 1 call recording server ~2000 phones over ~8 sites our last upgrade we tried PCD (joke) spent 4 hours on it before just doing it manually. Will be very hard pressed to every use PCD again. Then it was an additio

Re: [cisco-voip] Not supported I'm sure..... but what do you think?

2016-10-27 Thread Stephen Welsh
I’ve not done CUCM project work in quite a while, so may be completely off, but what about making this scenario supportable: Complex cluster say, 1 Pub, 6 Sub, 2 TFTP Install new software to inactive partition on all nodes, once complete reboot part of the cluster: 1 Pub - new version 3 Sub -

Re: [cisco-voip] Not supported I'm sure..... but what do you think?

2016-10-27 Thread Ryan Huff
You are right Anthony, this is a complex solution to avoid the reboot (and rolling the dice that nothing breaks in the first boot of the new version) in a switch-version however; if that is your goal as you state. -R From: avhollo...@gmail.com on behalf

Re: [cisco-voip] Not supported I'm sure..... but what do you think?

2016-10-27 Thread Anthony Holloway
Unless you only had a single CUCM node (which BE6KS limits you to, and BE6K customers are a fit for). In which case, a truly seeamless way to "flip" it would work in all scenarios. On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Justin Steinberg wrote: > The upgrades take too long is part of it. Especially i

Re: [cisco-voip] Not supported I'm sure..... but what do you think?

2016-10-27 Thread Justin Steinberg
The upgrades take too long is part of it. Especially if the upgrade is an RU upgrade, because it means that both the patch install/upgrade and the switch needs to take place in a maintenance mode. The missing piece in my opinion is a way to put CUCM into a maintenance mode where it continues to s

Re: [cisco-voip] Not supported I'm sure..... but what do you think?

2016-10-27 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
Change freezes aside (which are manageable), if we were able to upgrade the system onto the secondary partition, switch during a maintenance window, and switch back if there were any issues, that would be great. But too often, we see the upgrade requiring new underlying OS upgrades which are

[cisco-voip] mobile UCCx agents

2016-10-27 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
We've had a request come in to see if we could make our UCCx agents mobile and by mobile I'd say farther than any wireless headset could help with. >From what I understand, there's really no solution for this. Any solution >using a cell phone (extend/connect) would still require desktop agent

Re: [cisco-voip] Not supported I'm sure..... but what do you think?

2016-10-27 Thread Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
Honest question, what exactly is it about the current implementation that fails to deliver on this? Is it something in the design of the upgrade process? Is it that the upgrade takes too long to be done during any reasonable maintenance window? Is it that you have to test the new version befor

Re: [cisco-voip] Not supported I'm sure..... but what do you think?

2016-10-27 Thread Anthony Holloway
If only there was an upgrade process wherein you install the new version to an inactive partition, and then could switch to the new version when you're ready. /sarcasm But seriously though, everyone in this thread is essentially coming up with their own clever way of replicating the promise Cisco