I forgot to put a smiley face in that email, I wasn't trying to be a jerk
with my Trivial File Transfer Protocol jab :)
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Nick Barnett wrote:
> By definition, TFTP is trivial.
>
> The service either needed deactivated or the server needed to
By definition, TFTP is trivial.
The service either needed deactivated or the server needed to restart.
Either way, the TFTP server is going down to regenerate the certs.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Ryan Huff wrote:
> Anthony and James have highlighted one of the
The question I pose in response to that line of thinking is: Why is a client
pulling TFTP from the server while you're deactivating the services, and why do
you not have redundant TFTP?
The scenario I mentioned regarding the phone needing a restart would only be
necessary if the phone was in a
Anthony and James have highlighted one of the greater weaknesses of thinking
like an engineer.
As an engineer, we look at TFTP service interruption and see all the potential
outcomes and things that could happen. We think about a firmware download being
interrupted on an endpoint and realize
If the endpoint is 8000 miles away from you and located in a nuclear power
plant, that TFTP interruption wasn't so trivial.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Ben Amick wrote:
> An endpoint in the middle of an upgrade has already entirely downloaded
> the firmware into memory,
An endpoint in the middle of an upgrade has already entirely downloaded the
firmware into memory, and would not be affected. If it is mid-download then it
would have no affect other than breaking the operation and perhaps requiring a
manual restart if it is coming off a factory reset
Ben Amick
Is TFTP really that trivial? What would happen to an endpoint, which is in
the middle of a firmware upgrade, when you deactivate TFTP?
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Nick Barnett wrote:
> I figured that a reboot would work, but TAC told me it wouldn't... and
> rather
And if you have centralized call ingress/egress, like with enterprise SIP
trunks, you can use media class forking on the CUBE to cut down on WAN
usage.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Ryan Huff wrote:
> Cisco MediaSense is a great (and admittedly, simple) option for BIB
>
This worked beautifully. And yes, setting it on other side: codec side or
CM side, forced an update to the opposite side. Also, no Apply
Config/Reset/Restart required, the display at the top just changes.
Dangso simple. Well, I guess that's ignorance for you. I'm new to
Telepresence.
All the settings on the Device page correspond pretty directly to the
endpoint’s xconfig equivalent. In later TC code and UCM it will even push an
update you make on the endpoint up to UCM (for one of those fields).
There used to be an Admin guide for TP Enpoints with CUCM but I don’t know if
Do you have a link you can refer me to which explains how this setting is
used? And, do you know if all TP endpoints support that field equally?
I'll give this a try in a few minutes and report back. Thanks Ryan!
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
I’d recommend setting the System Name on the Device page for the C20. That
will sync up with the endpoint’s local setting and avoid any interop issues
with the Line value.
-Ryan
On Dec 1, 2016, at 1:27 PM, Anthony Holloway
wrote:
Hi All,
I am wondering if
I'm not aware of the connection between Verisign and CWMS. How did you
even think to do that? Random guess?
I do know that CWMS certs signed by an intermediate CA will require you to
upload the chain in a single file, in order for CWMS to present the chain
to the client machine. You can click
Cisco MediaSense is a great (and admittedly, simple) option for BIB recording;
just need to purchase the RTU and put it on some virtual hardware.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 1, 2016, at 9:17 AM, Brian Meade
> wrote:
You're probably much better using
You're probably much better using BIB(built-in bridge)-based/network
recording instead. It uses the Built-in-bridge of the phones to send
duplicate RTP streams to a recording server. Most recording servers out
there now prefer this method.
It's technically possible to route the span sessions
Does anyone know if the Cisco UDD program from UnityTools has any way it can be
programmed to automatically add new users to the file? It's been set up in our
environment for ever that we use that program to produce reports that are
harvested by as SQL script for reporting purposes, but it's
16 matches
Mail list logo