Thanks Ryan for that.
So I have to disable the services? I only stopped them. I will give it at
try
Ryan Huff schrieb am Sa. 11. März 2017 um 01:15:
> If it's still greyed out then one or more of the nodes is still reporting
> that one of those services is enabled.
>
> In certain older versions
If it's still greyed out then one or more of the nodes is still reporting that
one of those services is enabled.
In certain older versions I've seen this happen even when the services were all
disabled but because they were not disabled in the same order shown in the
guide.
Sent from my iPhone
Hello Group
We run cups 10.5.2.21900-4 and I try to change the IM address scheme to the
EMail address or Directory URI.
So I stopped the necessary five services and went to Advanced Presence
Settings. However there is no way that I can change the settings. They are
allways greyed out.
Has anyone
Thanks Ariel,
but incoming DP selection with URI matching, as advised by Brian and
later referenced by Nate, is the perfect fit for my needs (using COR
lists to do the authorization).
COR is the way to go for authorization AFAIK from ITS times, but I did
not know incoming DP selection could be don
Carlos,
Maybe something like this?
Inbound Leg Headers for Outbound Dial-Peer Matching
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/voice/cube/configuration/cube-book/inbound-hdr-for-outbound.html#concept_783172607421874995245657348632812
De: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nethe
Fair enough. I didn't understand what you were originally asking. Good
luck.
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 9:52 AM Carlos Mendioroz wrote:
> AFAIK, trusted list is just to enable signalling, but I want to
> differentiate what can each neighbour do.
> I need to talk to each SP, but I don't want one S
AFAIK, trusted list is just to enable signalling, but I want to
differentiate what can each neighbour do.
I need to talk to each SP, but I don't want one SP to be able to call
via another...
Anthony Holloway @ 10/03/2017 10:44 -0400 dixit:
> Maybe I'm missing what you're looking for, but why not j
it must be..
- Original Message -
From: Anthony Holloway
Date: Friday, March 10, 2017 8:46 am
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE call authorization ?
To: Carlos Mendioroz , cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Maybe I'm missing what you're looking for, but why not just use
> the built
>
Maybe I'm missing what you're looking for, but why not just use the built
in ip address trusted list?
https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/46566/understanding-toll-fraud-enhancements-1512t
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:16 AM Carlos Mendioroz via cisco-voip <
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> H
