[cisco-voip] Field Notice: Cisco Unified Communications Manager Release 12.0(x) does not support some deprecated phone models - Cisco

2017-04-30 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
Deprecation of old(er) phone models continue The following phone models are newly deprecated as of the 12.0(x) release: * Cisco Unified Wireless IP Phone 7921 * Cisco Unified IP Phone 7970 * Cisco Unified IP Phone 7971 http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/rel_notes

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating IP space

2017-04-30 Thread Ben Amick
Our 6900s and 8831s and 7900 comfy phones were ok, but seemingly all our 7900 desk phones as well as all the CIPCs were affected Ben Amick Telecom Analyst On May 1, 2017, at 12:19 AM, Brian Meade mailto:bmead...@vt.edu>> wrote: Did you have trust list issues on all phones or just pre-SBD model

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating IP space

2017-04-30 Thread Brian Meade
Did you have trust list issues on all phones or just pre-SBD model phones like 7960s/40s that have CTLs only? On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Ben Amick wrote: > So it seems like it wasn’t the ITL file at fault, but rather the CTL file > not being updated > > > > *Ben Amick* > > Telecom Analyst

Re: [cisco-voip] openldap for ucm/cuc

2017-04-30 Thread Mark Holloway
Yes. Using Oracle Internet Directory, which is based on OpenLDAP. > On Apr 18, 2017, at 1:28 PM, Tim Frazee wrote: > > anyone using openldap or apacheDS for directories instead of the de-facto > active directory? > ___ > cisco-voip mailing list > ci

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating IP space

2017-04-30 Thread Anthony Holloway
Nice find. I agree with how you read that. ITL will be regenerated and will not be the same as pre-change ITL. On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 2:06 PM James Buchanan wrote: > Hello, > > This is expected behavior if I read this correctly: > http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/instal

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating IP space

2017-04-30 Thread Ben Amick
So it seems like it wasn’t the ITL file at fault, but rather the CTL file not being updated Ben Amick Telecom Analyst From: James Buchanan [mailto:james.buchan...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2017 2:06 PM To: Ben Amick Cc: Ryan Huff ; Gary Bates_Command Solutions ; cisco-voip@puck.nether

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating IP space

2017-04-30 Thread James Buchanan
Hello, This is expected behavior if I read this correctly: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/install/9_0_1/ipchange/CUCM_BK_C936116C_00_changing-ipaddress-hostname-cucm-90.html#wp69916%0A . Thanks, James On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Ben Amick wrote: > V9.1.2, yeah, j

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating IP space

2017-04-30 Thread Ben Amick
V9.1.2, yeah, just IP change, along with DNS and NTP change as well because we were migrating entire IP scopes, but no hostname or cluster changes, no. Ben Amick Telecom Analyst From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2017 7:04 AM To: Gary Bates_Command Solutions C

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating IP space

2017-04-30 Thread Ben Amick
No, TAC just told me that was the issue. All my phones were triggering trust list failed. Ben Amick Telecom Analyst -Original Message- From: Jeffrey McHugh [mailto:jmch...@fidelus.com] Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2017 7:07 AM To: Ben Amick Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisc

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating IP space

2017-04-30 Thread Jeffrey McHugh
Any chance TAC pointed you to where this may be documented? IP change only shouldn't affect ITL file Jeffrey McHugh | Sr. Collaboration Consulting Engineer | VCP-DCV, CCNP Collaboration [Company_Logo_Image] Fidelus Technologies, LLC Named Best UC Provider in the USA

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating IP space

2017-04-30 Thread Ryan Huff
Ben, The "Prepare Cluster for Rollback to Pre 8.0" parameter in part, is used to empty out the ITL and CTL files on each phone (the process to do that involves more than just setting that parameter though). As I recall, you enable the parameter, bounce TVS on each server to clear out all entri

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating IP space

2017-04-30 Thread Gary Bates_Command Solutions
Very odd bug fix I not encountered this before, I thout the idea of named hostnames for the server wod alleviate the need for any IP address dependency Did it resolve the phone connection bug ? Gary Sent from my iPhone > On 30 Apr 2017, at 3:19 pm, Ben Amick wrote: > > So I was performing