8.10 dropped and was wondering how fast people typically start planning for
upgrades. personally I'm waiting for 11.5(1)su3 to drop and sit for a bit
before i'd bother with 8.10, but just wanted to get the temp of the group.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Ryan Huff wrote:
> I'd personally say
I'd personally say anything 8.8+ is good 2 go and it's mostly still just the
Jabber stuff that doesn't work over MRA (which is documented).
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 17, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Tim Frazee
mailto:tfra...@gmail.com>> wrote:
When I say "sit" would be how long do I let other Cisco cust
When I say "sit" would be how long do I let other Cisco customers find any
serious issues before I would hop on. Wait for the "a" revision to drop.
was typical back in the day. not sure if expressway had the same history.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Ryan Huff wrote:
> Not sure what you're
Not sure what you're referring to by "sit"? Are you referring to a hardware
burn-in of the host chassis the guest VM is running on?
During the non-production period, is the business using it to validate its
configuration and usability for its specified business case? Usually, once UAT
(User Acc
Hi
new to the expressway suite and was wondering whats the average wait time
(if any) for new versions of expressway to sit before you consider them
production worthy.
for ucm/cup/cuc, I usually give it no more than a month before I would
consider it "stable" but was interested in what this group
