Re: [cisco-voip] PLM service affecting?

Just make sure you do a resync. You’ll want to find out right away whether or not all your product instances can talk or not. --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519-824-4120 Ext 56354 le...@uoguelph.ca

Re: [cisco-voip] PLM service affecting?

No. From: Scott Voll [mailto:svoll.v...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 4:12 PM To: Matthew Loraditch Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PLM service affecting? But if we patch it, will it affect anything when it boots back

Re: [cisco-voip] PLM service affecting?

But if we patch it, will it affect anything when it boots back up? Scott On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Matthew Loraditch < mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com> wrote: > PLM can be down for the entire grace period before it affects anything. As > long as it’s standalone you are good. > > > >

Re: [cisco-voip] PLM service affecting?

+1 for stand alone PLM ☺ --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519-824-4120 Ext 56354 le...@uoguelph.ca www.uoguelph.ca/ccs Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 From:

Re: [cisco-voip] PLM service affecting?

PLM can be down for the entire grace period before it affects anything. As long as it’s standalone you are good. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 4:01 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip]

[cisco-voip] PLM service affecting?

Quick question. is PLM patching service affecting? we just want to patch PLM in the middle of the day and afraid to poke the button. ;-) TIA Scott ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] can CUCM config w/ FQDN be avoided any more?

You can still have an FQDN in the certificate (which is I believe what the commercial CA will look for), while in System > Server be defined with IP addresses. As far as I know, the two are not related. What I'm not really sure of, and I've never taken the time to fully quantify, is whether there

Re: [cisco-voip] can CUCM config w/ FQDN be avoided any more?

Same boat here. DNS however has proven quite reliable and in hindsight, we did not need to fear it. We are worried that turning on DNS could potentially invalidate the certificates use to verify phones are talking to the right cluster. If we did use DNS, I am sure we would have used FQDN to

[cisco-voip] can CUCM config w/ FQDN be avoided any more?

So, we, like many others, went with IP addresses as hostname in our CUCM cluster. Best practice, avoid DNS issues, etc. But now, certificate authorities will not grant certificates to private IP addresses and we need (would like) publicly signed certificates to avoid those pesky errors. I