I hope you saw that I wrote "Pseudo Config" and don't just try to copy and
paste that. I'm also not very convinced that this is the core of your
issue, but you're more than welcome to give it a try.
You said the first OPTIONS does respond, so I'm guessing it's not going to
be a binding error. In
Thanks, i am about to modify the config to check.
Many thanks
wt., 9 paź 2018 o 20:58 Anthony Holloway
napisał(a):
> OPTIONS does not have to match a dial peer to work. However, if you are
> going to match a dial peer at all, it would likely be for the express
> purpose of replying from the c
The box has 4 NP108 cards in it. But I have heard that it is possible to run
into processor limits on voip calls in a 5400 before the number of DSP’s is
fully utilized. It is possible I’ve heard incorrectly; I’m just trying to find
out what is accurate.
From: NateCCIE
Sent: Tuesday, October 09
I wonder if it would help to secure the cable to the table somehow with a
“service” loop near the phone. This way, moving the device, it’s only got a bit
of weight of the cable.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal
To do Voice, you will need DSPs, 1 dsp is 64 g711 calls. That will be the
limiting factor over PSTN connectivity.
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/unified-communications/as5
400xm-universal-gateway/product_data_sheet0900aecd80458049.html
From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of J
Unfortunately not. It’s just a port on the back of the phone. The port is
slightly recessed in to the housing so that does help some but it’s not really
effective in keeping the cord secure. I have to wonder if some of these designs
are ever field tested in a real world environment before they m
I am recently put in the position of working with some old AS5400s. I put the
following question to the cisco nas list, but I thought it might be appropriate
for here, too
The only other question is about the number of voip calls the box can support.
My understanding (possibly wrong) is tha
Well, this is not encouraging to hear. ☹
And there’s likely no spot to put anything with a wire tie either? Usually,
they have those little plastic hooks, like the ones that would hold an rj11
cable.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University
Yes, also we hit some bugs with an early FW release. Once it downgraded from
the factory load, it would brick the phone. Must be a major issue because I had
to wait almost 2 months for RMA fulfillment. Now that we are running current
firmware with that bugfix, we seem to be past that issue but n
To be honest I won't deploy 8832 in my org as we still struggling to get one up
and running since few months. Few TAC/RMA already in progress.
W dniu 9 paź 2018, 20:35, o 20:35, użytkownik JASON BURWELL
napisał:
>Has anyone else using 8832s had a problem with the USB-C cord coming
>unplugged f
Has anyone else using 8832s had a problem with the USB-C cord coming unplugged
from the phone when people grab it to slide or move the phone towards them?
Starting to see some issues with this and I only have a few deployed so far.
Hoping someone has figured out a workaround or clip to help reta
OPTIONS does not have to match a dial peer to work. However, if you are
going to match a dial peer at all, it would likely be for the express
purpose of replying from the correct interface, if you have more than one
potential interfaces, and you for some reason cannot bind globally. Thus
using th
While I’m sure it will work, TAC will probably wave a finger. 6.7 support is
targeted for when the 12.5 releases FCS
Matthew Loraditch
Sr. Network Engineer
p: 443.541.1518
w: www.heliontechnologies.com | e: mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com
From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of Scott Voll
Sent: Tuesday
All--
I"m currently running most all UC apps on 11.5/6. It looks like from what
I can find, ESXi is supported up to 6.5.
My infrastructure Engineer would like to upgrade to 6.7. Does anyone see
any problems with that?
Will TAC explode if they find out?
TIA
Scott
_
Thanks for prompt answer.
No, i am not using CCP.
As i see OPTIONS ping does not match with any dialpeer
Oct 9 17:50:04.068:
//3652/95FFAA748E45/SIP/Info/info/1024/ccsipInitPldCallingInfo: non-numeric
calling number: *stringhere*
Oct 9 17:50:04.068:
//3652/95FFAA748E45/SIP/Info/verbose/1024/si
I'd do the Domona thing personally, because if you are electing to
integrate voicemail and email, then not having your email and voicemail
synced can become a problem. As is the case with Accept and Relay. Now,
you could just to do Relay with no Accept, but then you take away the
ability to check
Unified messaging functionality between UCN and Gmail does not have to go Esna
CloudLink.
Donoma Unify for Gmail is a solution available for this functionality.
Available as cloud service or on prem virtual application and has been through
Cisco Interoperability Verification testing so it’s a
Is there any one out there that is using google for their domain, but
running cucm, unity and an ESNA cloudlink relay? I see now that ESNA might
be part of avaya?
What are seeing people trying when they want to relay voicemail to email
boxes on google?
does cisco have a voicemail relay that can b
Are you using Customer Call Back? Which dial peer is the options ping
hitting? Does that dial peer have the CCB script on it? If so... maybe make
another dial peer for options pings that does not have the script enabled.
This is just a hunch...
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 6:50 AM Maciej Bylica wrote:
Hi
I have really strange problem with SIP OPTIONS pings.
The Cisco i have (CUBE 3945 ios Version 15.3(3)M5) responds only to the
first OPTIONS packet that is received from the endpoint.
The rest of OPTIONs are dropped with following debug output:
Oct 9 12:52:06 10.10.10.10 8694907: Oct 9 10:55:
Hmmm, can’t comment on using it over slow links, but I’ve enjoyed the new
tools. Except for the expanding each note section, maybe.
The file upload tool is one of the best they’ve made. They better not change
that any tie soon. :)
-sent from mobile device-
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Not a fan of the website changes for TAC cases..lots of spinning
wheels. https://mycase.cloudapps.cisco.com/case
Contract is associated to account, yet Open TAC case can't find the Service
Contract, have to call in every time, took 30 minutes to open a new case over
the phone.
Try
22 matches
Mail list logo
