Re: [cisco-voip] it's going to get expensive to support T1/PRIs going forward...

2019-04-05 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi 
Ok. This one goes out to the Cisco folks…

Two compare pages:

Starting from:

https://www.cisco.com/c/en_ca/products/routers/4000-series-integrated-services-routers-isr/index.html

compare button brings you to:

https://www.cisco.com/c/en_ca/products/routers/4000-series-integrated-services-routers-isr/models-comparison.html

this one shows only 5 products and different capacities.

Starting from

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/routers/4000-series-integrated-services-routers-isr/index.html

compare button brings you to:

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/routers/4000-series-integrated-services-routers-isr/models-comparison.html

which shows 7 products and different capacities.





---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

From: Lelio Fulgenzi 
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 5:32 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; Matthew Loraditch 
; voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
Subject: RE: it's going to get expensive to support T1/PRIs going forward...


Yup – definitely something awry with the compare page. I did a simple 
copy/paste into a spreadsheet and I have the 4451 supporting up to 2000 SRST, 
and now it’s at 1500.

Weird. Damn Friday.


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

From: cisco-voip 
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 5:23 PM
To: Matthew Loraditch 
mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com>>; 
voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] it's going to get expensive to support T1/PRIs going 
forward...

Interesting. I’ll have to do some more reading. I read Jan 2019 at the top of 
that FAQ. But it’s Jan 2018. That being said, the data sheet is older than the 
FAQ.

It’s too bad the compare products sheet doesn’t have the modules listed. I did 
try to configure a 4331 with a T1 module and they do show up, so that’s good.

Of more interest is that either someone at Cisco just updated some web pages or 
I stumble across an old link, since the 4461 just appeared on the pages!

And I swear I did not see T1s listed in the compare products, but now they do!

Hmmm

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

From: Matthew Loraditch 
mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com>>
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 5:07 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>; voyp list, 
cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: it's going to get expensive to support T1/PRIs going forward...

That’s not correct. You can do a T1 on 4321s and up.

That’s a very old FAQ from before the 43XXs were out.


https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/4000-series-integrated-services-routers-isr/data_sheet_c78-728308.html?referring_site=RE&pos=1&page=https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/4000-series-integrated-services-routers-isr/qa_c67-728823.html


“The modules are supported on the Cisco 4000 and require Cisco IOS XE Software 
Release 3.9.

The DSP farm services (conferencing & transcoding) on the modules are supported 
only on Release 3.11 and above.”


Matthew Loraditch​

Sr. Network Engineer


p: 443.541.1518



w: www.heliontechnologies.com

 |

e: mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com


[Helion Technologies]


[Facebook]



[Twitter]


[LinkedIn]







From: cisco-voip 
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 5:02 PM
To: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subjec

Re: [cisco-voip] it's going to get expensive to support T1/PRIs going forward...

2019-04-05 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi 

Yup – definitely something awry with the compare page. I did a simple 
copy/paste into a spreadsheet and I have the 4451 supporting up to 2000 SRST, 
and now it’s at 1500.

Weird. Damn Friday.


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of Lelio 
Fulgenzi
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 5:23 PM
To: Matthew Loraditch ; voyp list, 
cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] it's going to get expensive to support T1/PRIs going 
forward...

Interesting. I’ll have to do some more reading. I read Jan 2019 at the top of 
that FAQ. But it’s Jan 2018. That being said, the data sheet is older than the 
FAQ.

It’s too bad the compare products sheet doesn’t have the modules listed. I did 
try to configure a 4331 with a T1 module and they do show up, so that’s good.

Of more interest is that either someone at Cisco just updated some web pages or 
I stumble across an old link, since the 4461 just appeared on the pages!

And I swear I did not see T1s listed in the compare products, but now they do!

Hmmm

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

From: Matthew Loraditch 
mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com>>
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 5:07 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>; voyp list, 
cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: it's going to get expensive to support T1/PRIs going forward...

That’s not correct. You can do a T1 on 4321s and up.

That’s a very old FAQ from before the 43XXs were out.


https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/4000-series-integrated-services-routers-isr/data_sheet_c78-728308.html?referring_site=RE&pos=1&page=https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/4000-series-integrated-services-routers-isr/qa_c67-728823.html


“The modules are supported on the Cisco 4000 and require Cisco IOS XE Software 
Release 3.9.

The DSP farm services (conferencing & transcoding) on the modules are supported 
only on Release 3.11 and above.”


Matthew Loraditch​

Sr. Network Engineer


p: 443.541.1518



w: www.heliontechnologies.com

 |

e: mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com


[Helion Technologies]


[Facebook]



[Twitter]


[LinkedIn]







From: cisco-voip 
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 5:02 PM
To: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: [cisco-voip] it's going to get expensive to support T1/PRIs going 
forward...


OK, I knew the writing was on the wall, but I didn’t think I’d be forced to buy 
the most expensive ISR4K out there, just to support T1/PRIs. ☹

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/4000-series-integrated-services-routers-isr/qa_c67-728823.html

Cisco Fourth Generation 1-, 2-, 4-, and 8-Port T1/E1 Multiflex Trunk Voice/WAN 
Network Interface Modules FAQ

Q.What version of Cisco IOS ® Software is required for supporting the Cisco 
NIM MFT cards, and what are the Cisco IOS Software license requirements?
A. The Cisco 1-, 2-, 4-, and 8-port NIM cards are supported only on the 
Cisco 4451-X ISR. The modules are supported only with Cisco IOS XE 3.9.1.
Data applications require a minimum of the IP Base Technology Package, and 
voice applications require a minimum of the Unified Communications Technology 
Package.


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] it's going to get expensive to support T1/PRIs going forward...

2019-04-05 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi 
Interesting. I’ll have to do some more reading. I read Jan 2019 at the top of 
that FAQ. But it’s Jan 2018. That being said, the data sheet is older than the 
FAQ.

It’s too bad the compare products sheet doesn’t have the modules listed. I did 
try to configure a 4331 with a T1 module and they do show up, so that’s good.

Of more interest is that either someone at Cisco just updated some web pages or 
I stumble across an old link, since the 4461 just appeared on the pages!

And I swear I did not see T1s listed in the compare products, but now they do!

Hmmm

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

From: Matthew Loraditch 
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 5:07 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
Subject: RE: it's going to get expensive to support T1/PRIs going forward...

That’s not correct. You can do a T1 on 4321s and up.

That’s a very old FAQ from before the 43XXs were out.


https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/4000-series-integrated-services-routers-isr/data_sheet_c78-728308.html?referring_site=RE&pos=1&page=https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/4000-series-integrated-services-routers-isr/qa_c67-728823.html


“The modules are supported on the Cisco 4000 and require Cisco IOS XE Software 
Release 3.9.

The DSP farm services (conferencing & transcoding) on the modules are supported 
only on Release 3.11 and above.”


Matthew Loraditch​

Sr. Network Engineer


p: 443.541.1518



w: www.heliontechnologies.com

 |

e: mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com


[Helion Technologies]


[Facebook]



[Twitter]


[LinkedIn]







From: cisco-voip 
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 5:02 PM
To: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: [cisco-voip] it's going to get expensive to support T1/PRIs going 
forward...


OK, I knew the writing was on the wall, but I didn’t think I’d be forced to buy 
the most expensive ISR4K out there, just to support T1/PRIs. ☹

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/4000-series-integrated-services-routers-isr/qa_c67-728823.html

Cisco Fourth Generation 1-, 2-, 4-, and 8-Port T1/E1 Multiflex Trunk Voice/WAN 
Network Interface Modules FAQ

Q.What version of Cisco IOS ® Software is required for supporting the Cisco 
NIM MFT cards, and what are the Cisco IOS Software license requirements?
A. The Cisco 1-, 2-, 4-, and 8-port NIM cards are supported only on the 
Cisco 4451-X ISR. The modules are supported only with Cisco IOS XE 3.9.1.
Data applications require a minimum of the IP Base Technology Package, and 
voice applications require a minimum of the Unified Communications Technology 
Package.


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco TSP Driver & windows 10 (CUCM 11.5)

2019-04-05 Thread James Dust 


On 5 Apr 2019, at 11:13, James Dust 
mailto:james.d...@charles-stanley.co.uk>> 
wrote:

Morning all,

Apologies if this has been touched on before, I just wondered if anyone else 
has a work around for windows 10 x 64 and using the TSP/TAPI driver.

We have cucm 11.5 and are trying to get a piece of software called ‘identapop’ 
working with a windows 10 install.

Any help appreciated.

James

Consider the environment - Think before you print

The contents of this email are confidential to the intended recipient and may 
not be disclosed. Although it is believed that this email and any attachments 
are virus free, it is the responsibility of the recipient to confirm this.

You are advised that urgent, time-sensitive communications should not be sent 
by email. We hereby give you notice that a delivery receipt does not constitute 
acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).

Details of Charles Stanley group companies and their regulators (where 
applicable), can be found at this URL 
http://www.charles-stanley.co.uk/contact-us/disclosure/

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] it's going to get expensive to support T1/PRIs going forward...

2019-04-05 Thread Matthew Loraditch 
That’s not correct. You can do a T1 on 4321s and up.

That’s a very old FAQ from before the 43XXs were out.


https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/4000-series-integrated-services-routers-isr/data_sheet_c78-728308.html?referring_site=RE&pos=1&page=https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/4000-series-integrated-services-routers-isr/qa_c67-728823.html


“The modules are supported on the Cisco 4000 and require Cisco IOS XE Software 
Release 3.9.

The DSP farm services (conferencing & transcoding) on the modules are supported 
only on Release 3.11 and above.”

Matthew Loraditch
Sr. Network Engineer
p: 443.541.1518
w: www.heliontechnologies.com | e: mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com
From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of Lelio 
Fulgenzi
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 5:02 PM
To: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 

Subject: [cisco-voip] it's going to get expensive to support T1/PRIs going 
forward...


OK, I knew the writing was on the wall, but I didn’t think I’d be forced to buy 
the most expensive ISR4K out there, just to support T1/PRIs. ☹

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/4000-series-integrated-services-routers-isr/qa_c67-728823.html

Cisco Fourth Generation 1-, 2-, 4-, and 8-Port T1/E1 Multiflex Trunk Voice/WAN 
Network Interface Modules FAQ

Q.What version of Cisco IOS ® Software is required for supporting the Cisco 
NIM MFT cards, and what are the Cisco IOS Software license requirements?
A. The Cisco 1-, 2-, 4-, and 8-port NIM cards are supported only on the 
Cisco 4451-X ISR. The modules are supported only with Cisco IOS XE 3.9.1.
Data applications require a minimum of the IP Base Technology Package, and 
voice applications require a minimum of the Unified Communications Technology 
Package.


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] it's going to get expensive to support T1/PRIs going forward...

2019-04-05 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi 

OK, I knew the writing was on the wall, but I didn’t think I’d be forced to buy 
the most expensive ISR4K out there, just to support T1/PRIs. ☹

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/4000-series-integrated-services-routers-isr/qa_c67-728823.html

Cisco Fourth Generation 1-, 2-, 4-, and 8-Port T1/E1 Multiflex Trunk Voice/WAN 
Network Interface Modules FAQ

Q.What version of Cisco IOS ® Software is required for supporting the Cisco 
NIM MFT cards, and what are the Cisco IOS Software license requirements?
A. The Cisco 1-, 2-, 4-, and 8-port NIM cards are supported only on the 
Cisco 4451-X ISR. The modules are supported only with Cisco IOS XE 3.9.1.
Data applications require a minimum of the IP Base Technology Package, and 
voice applications require a minimum of the Unified Communications Technology 
Package.


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

<>___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules

2019-04-05 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi 
Let us know how it goes.

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook



-Original Message-
From: Pawlowski, Adam  
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 3:06 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules

Ha, I set that in the new notification system, but it must not have hit my 
cycle. Some more fun to test next week.

Thanks for looking on that one, I appreciate the good end to a long week.



> -Original Message-
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi 
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 3:04 PM
> To: Pawlowski, Adam ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> 
> Good news! (???)
> 
> Bug reports:
> 
> Last Modified: Apr 5,2019
> Status: Fixed
> 
> Known Fixed Releases: (4)
> 16.12(0.82)
> 15.8(3.0j)M1
> 15.8(3)M2
> 15.7(3.0c)M4
> 
> software.cisco.com shows:
> 
> Release 15.8.3M2 ED
> 
> Release notes show:
> 
> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/15-8m/release/notes/
> 15-8-
> 3-m-rel-notes.html
> 
> Resolved Bugs-Cisco IOS Release 15.8(3)M2 Table 1. Resolved Bugs-Cisco 
> IOS Release 15.8(3)M2
> 
> CSCvo11786 SCCP Application does not clear failed sockets leading to 
> leak and socket pool exhaustion
> 
> 
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
> Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph Room 037 
> Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca
> 
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Pawlowski, Adam 
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 1:46 PM
> To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> 
> It is CSCvo11786 , fixed in a number of versions but none that I'm 
> aware of being public yet. This was a real pain to identify but caught it on 
> a whim.
> 
> We have an expect script that rolls though and emails us the socket 
> counts for the SCCP Application process. You can do any number of 
> things, reload the device, clear the sockets, restart SCCP application.
> 
> All of those things will disrupt the service for more or less time 
> depending on which you choose, but when the socket count hits max it 
> will simply stop operating anyways.
> 
> The VG204XM seems to open 1 socket (?) but the VG310/320 open one per 
> each port that's configured, so depending on what's going on that may 
> cause the application to disconnect, and how aggressive it retries, 
> these can stack up quickly we found.
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lelio Fulgenzi 
> > Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 1:07 PM
> > To: Pawlowski, Adam ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> >
> > Yowza. That's not good. Is there a bug ID you can share? Is there a
> workaround?
> > Software Reload? Power Reset?
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst Computing and Communications 
> > Services | University of Guelph Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition 
> > Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
> > 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca
> >
> > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of 
> > Pawlowski, Adam
> > Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 12:57 PM
> > To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> >
> > Would also be interested to know if there is anything going on with 
> > those other than the general (maybe?) sunset of IOS eventually.
> >
> > There's a bug we got filed for IOS SCCP where sockets do not get 
> > cleaned up by the process, so if there are connectivity issues the 
> > gateways will just not re- register or operate. It's been fixed but 
> > the IOS release is not out yet. For a while we were deploying the
> > VG310/320 and found them to be unreliable because of this. This 
> > impacts the VG204XM as well just takes a lot longer to become apparent.
> >
> > Adam
> > ___
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules

2019-04-05 Thread Pawlowski, Adam 
Ha, I set that in the new notification system, but it must not have hit my 
cycle. Some more fun to test next week.

Thanks for looking on that one, I appreciate the good end to a long week.



> -Original Message-
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi 
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 3:04 PM
> To: Pawlowski, Adam ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> 
> Good news! (???)
> 
> Bug reports:
> 
> Last Modified: Apr 5,2019
> Status: Fixed
> 
> Known Fixed Releases: (4)
> 16.12(0.82)
> 15.8(3.0j)M1
> 15.8(3)M2
> 15.7(3.0c)M4
> 
> software.cisco.com shows:
> 
> Release 15.8.3M2 ED
> 
> Release notes show:
> 
> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/15-8m/release/notes/15-8-
> 3-m-rel-notes.html
> 
> Resolved Bugs-Cisco IOS Release 15.8(3)M2 Table 1. Resolved Bugs-Cisco IOS
> Release 15.8(3)M2
> 
> CSCvo11786 SCCP Application does not clear failed sockets leading to leak and
> socket pool exhaustion
> 
> 
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
> Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph Room 037
> Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca
> 
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Pawlowski, Adam 
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 1:46 PM
> To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> 
> It is CSCvo11786 , fixed in a number of versions but none that I'm aware of
> being public yet. This was a real pain to identify but caught it on a whim.
> 
> We have an expect script that rolls though and emails us the socket counts for
> the SCCP Application process. You can do any number of things, reload the
> device, clear the sockets, restart SCCP application.
> 
> All of those things will disrupt the service for more or less time depending 
> on
> which you choose, but when the socket count hits max it will simply stop
> operating anyways.
> 
> The VG204XM seems to open 1 socket (?) but the VG310/320 open one per
> each port that's configured, so depending on what's going on that may cause
> the application to disconnect, and how aggressive it retries, these can stack 
> up
> quickly we found.
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lelio Fulgenzi 
> > Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 1:07 PM
> > To: Pawlowski, Adam ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> >
> > Yowza. That's not good. Is there a bug ID you can share? Is there a
> workaround?
> > Software Reload? Power Reset?
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
> > Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph Room 037
> > Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
> > 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca
> >
> > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of
> > Pawlowski, Adam
> > Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 12:57 PM
> > To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> >
> > Would also be interested to know if there is anything going on with
> > those other than the general (maybe?) sunset of IOS eventually.
> >
> > There's a bug we got filed for IOS SCCP where sockets do not get
> > cleaned up by the process, so if there are connectivity issues the
> > gateways will just not re- register or operate. It's been fixed but
> > the IOS release is not out yet. For a while we were deploying the
> > VG310/320 and found them to be unreliable because of this. This
> > impacts the VG204XM as well just takes a lot longer to become apparent.
> >
> > Adam
> > ___
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules

2019-04-05 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi 
Good news! (???)

Bug reports:

Last Modified: Apr 5,2019
Status: Fixed

Known Fixed Releases:   (4)
16.12(0.82)
15.8(3.0j)M1
15.8(3)M2
15.7(3.0c)M4

software.cisco.com shows:

Release 15.8.3M2 ED

Release notes show:

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/15-8m/release/notes/15-8-3-m-rel-notes.html

Resolved Bugs-Cisco IOS Release 15.8(3)M2
Table 1. Resolved Bugs-Cisco IOS Release 15.8(3)M2

CSCvo11786 SCCP Application does not clear failed sockets leading to leak and 
socket pool exhaustion


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook



-Original Message-
From: Pawlowski, Adam  
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 1:46 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules

It is CSCvo11786 , fixed in a number of versions but none that I'm aware of 
being public yet. This was a real pain to identify but caught it on a whim.

We have an expect script that rolls though and emails us the socket counts for 
the SCCP Application process. You can do any number of things, reload the 
device, clear the sockets, restart SCCP application.

All of those things will disrupt the service for more or less time depending on 
which you choose, but when the socket count hits max it will simply stop 
operating anyways.

The VG204XM seems to open 1 socket (?) but the VG310/320 open one per each port 
that's configured, so depending on what's going on that may cause the 
application to disconnect, and how aggressive it retries, these can stack up 
quickly we found.



> -Original Message-
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi 
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 1:07 PM
> To: Pawlowski, Adam ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> 
> Yowza. That's not good. Is there a bug ID you can share? Is there a 
> workaround?
> Software Reload? Power Reset?
> 
> 
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
> Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph Room 037 
> Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca
> 
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of 
> Pawlowski, Adam
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 12:57 PM
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> 
> Would also be interested to know if there is anything going on with 
> those other than the general (maybe?) sunset of IOS eventually.
> 
> There's a bug we got filed for IOS SCCP where sockets do not get 
> cleaned up by the process, so if there are connectivity issues the 
> gateways will just not re- register or operate. It's been fixed but 
> the IOS release is not out yet. For a while we were deploying the 
> VG310/320 and found them to be unreliable because of this. This 
> impacts the VG204XM as well just takes a lot longer to become apparent.
> 
> Adam
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules

2019-04-05 Thread Pawlowski, Adam 
Not as far as we've observed, as long the app doesn't disconnect from the UCM 
for whatever reason it doesn't open any more sockets.



> -Original Message-
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi 
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 1:57 PM
> To: Pawlowski, Adam ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> 
> 
> Does this happen based on uptime or load/calls on the gateway?
> 
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
> Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph Room 037
> Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca
> 
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Pawlowski, Adam 
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 1:46 PM
> To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> 
> It is CSCvo11786 , fixed in a number of versions but none that I'm aware of
> being public yet. This was a real pain to identify but caught it on a whim.
> 
> We have an expect script that rolls though and emails us the socket counts for
> the SCCP Application process. You can do any number of things, reload the
> device, clear the sockets, restart SCCP application.
> 
> All of those things will disrupt the service for more or less time depending 
> on
> which you choose, but when the socket count hits max it will simply stop
> operating anyways.
> 
> The VG204XM seems to open 1 socket (?) but the VG310/320 open one per
> each port that's configured, so depending on what's going on that may cause
> the application to disconnect, and how aggressive it retries, these can stack 
> up
> quickly we found.
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lelio Fulgenzi 
> > Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 1:07 PM
> > To: Pawlowski, Adam ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> >
> > Yowza. That's not good. Is there a bug ID you can share? Is there a
> workaround?
> > Software Reload? Power Reset?
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
> > Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph Room 037
> > Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
> > 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca
> >
> > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of
> > Pawlowski, Adam
> > Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 12:57 PM
> > To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> >
> > Would also be interested to know if there is anything going on with
> > those other than the general (maybe?) sunset of IOS eventually.
> >
> > There's a bug we got filed for IOS SCCP where sockets do not get
> > cleaned up by the process, so if there are connectivity issues the
> > gateways will just not re- register or operate. It's been fixed but
> > the IOS release is not out yet. For a while we were deploying the
> > VG310/320 and found them to be unreliable because of this. This
> > impacts the VG204XM as well just takes a lot longer to become apparent.
> >
> > Adam
> > ___
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules

2019-04-05 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi 


Does this happen based on uptime or load/calls on the gateway? 

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook



-Original Message-
From: Pawlowski, Adam  
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 1:46 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules

It is CSCvo11786 , fixed in a number of versions but none that I'm aware of 
being public yet. This was a real pain to identify but caught it on a whim.

We have an expect script that rolls though and emails us the socket counts for 
the SCCP Application process. You can do any number of things, reload the 
device, clear the sockets, restart SCCP application.

All of those things will disrupt the service for more or less time depending on 
which you choose, but when the socket count hits max it will simply stop 
operating anyways.

The VG204XM seems to open 1 socket (?) but the VG310/320 open one per each port 
that's configured, so depending on what's going on that may cause the 
application to disconnect, and how aggressive it retries, these can stack up 
quickly we found.



> -Original Message-
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi 
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 1:07 PM
> To: Pawlowski, Adam ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> 
> Yowza. That's not good. Is there a bug ID you can share? Is there a 
> workaround?
> Software Reload? Power Reset?
> 
> 
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
> Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph Room 037 
> Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca
> 
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of 
> Pawlowski, Adam
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 12:57 PM
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> 
> Would also be interested to know if there is anything going on with 
> those other than the general (maybe?) sunset of IOS eventually.
> 
> There's a bug we got filed for IOS SCCP where sockets do not get 
> cleaned up by the process, so if there are connectivity issues the 
> gateways will just not re- register or operate. It's been fixed but 
> the IOS release is not out yet. For a while we were deploying the 
> VG310/320 and found them to be unreliable because of this. This 
> impacts the VG204XM as well just takes a lot longer to become apparent.
> 
> Adam
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules

2019-04-05 Thread Pawlowski, Adam 
It is CSCvo11786 , fixed in a number of versions but none that I'm aware of 
being public yet. This was a real pain to identify but caught it on a whim.

We have an expect script that rolls though and emails us the socket counts for 
the SCCP Application process. You can do any number of things, reload the 
device, clear the sockets, restart SCCP application.

All of those things will disrupt the service for more or less time depending on 
which you choose, but when the socket count hits max it will simply stop 
operating anyways.

The VG204XM seems to open 1 socket (?) but the VG310/320 open one per each port 
that's configured, so depending on what's going on that may cause the 
application to disconnect, and how aggressive it retries, these can stack up 
quickly we found.



> -Original Message-
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi 
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 1:07 PM
> To: Pawlowski, Adam ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> 
> Yowza. That's not good. Is there a bug ID you can share? Is there a 
> workaround?
> Software Reload? Power Reset?
> 
> 
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
> Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph Room 037
> Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca
> 
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of
> Pawlowski, Adam
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 12:57 PM
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules
> 
> Would also be interested to know if there is anything going on with those 
> other
> than the general (maybe?) sunset of IOS eventually.
> 
> There's a bug we got filed for IOS SCCP where sockets do not get cleaned up by
> the process, so if there are connectivity issues the gateways will just not 
> re-
> register or operate. It's been fixed but the IOS release is not out yet. For 
> a while
> we were deploying the VG310/320 and found them to be unreliable because of
> this. This impacts the VG204XM as well just takes a lot longer to become
> apparent.
> 
> Adam
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules

2019-04-05 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi 
Yowza. That's not good. Is there a bug ID you can share? Is there a workaround? 
Software Reload? Power Reset?


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook



-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of Pawlowski, 
Adam
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 12:57 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules

Would also be interested to know if there is anything going on with those other 
than the general (maybe?) sunset of IOS eventually.

There's a bug we got filed for IOS SCCP where sockets do not get cleaned up by 
the process, so if there are connectivity issues the gateways will just not 
re-register or operate. It's been fixed but the IOS release is not out yet. For 
a while we were deploying the VG310/320 and found them to be unreliable because 
of this. This impacts the VG204XM as well just takes a lot longer to become 
apparent. 

Adam
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules

2019-04-05 Thread Pawlowski, Adam 
Would also be interested to know if there is anything going on with those other 
than the general (maybe?) sunset of IOS eventually.

There's a bug we got filed for IOS SCCP where sockets do not get cleaned up by 
the process, so if there are connectivity issues the gateways will just not 
re-register or operate. It's been fixed but the IOS release is not out yet. For 
a while we were deploying the VG310/320 and found them to be unreliable because 
of this. This impacts the VG204XM as well just takes a lot longer to become 
apparent. 

Adam
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Session/connection limits on multi-tenant CUBE

2019-04-05 Thread Fred Hunt 
We are trying to determine the best was to configure what will essentially
be multi-tenant CUBEs.  These will be multi-tenant in the sense that they
will interface with a number of different CUCM and IVR environments.  Each
environment will be considered a tenant.  We need a means of limiting the
number of SIP sessions the different environments will be allowed to use.
Unfortunately, I’m not seeing any tenant level commands that facilitate
doing so:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/voice/cube/configuration/cube-book/voi-cube-multi-tenants.html#reference_0DECA59896064A95ACCB2A2553107EA8

Thus far, we have come up with the idea to create different “voice class
uri” entries, comprised of the various IP addresses for each tenant.  Those
voice class uri entries would be used for dial-peer matching and a
“max-conn” parameter would be used to limit the number of connections using
each dial-peer.  We typically configure separate dial-peers for inbound and
outbound matching, in order to make the configuration more easy to visually
review.  If we continue with that design, this would allow us to implement
session limits on inbound and outbound dial-peers corresponding with each
environment.  However, we want to be able to apply a session limit globally
for each tenant, meaning inbound and outbound both count cumulatively
towards that limit.

Would it be better to have a consolidated dial-peer for each tenant, which
would be used for both inbound and outbound purposes, and has a “max-conn”
parameter?  My understanding is that to accomplish that we would use
“incoming uri” matching for the inbound side and destination dial-peer
group (using “voice class dpg” and “destination dpg”) for the outbound
side.  Alternatively, I think we could use pattern maps (“voice class
e164-pattern-map” and “destination e164-pattern-map”) instead.

Has any Cisco-VoIP list member faced this same scenario and, if so, what
configuration met your needs?  Am I missing a tenant level command that
would fulfill this need?  Am I on the best path to accomplish this with
what I outlined in the paragraph above?

Thanks in advance for any feedback
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco TSP Driver & windows 10 (CUCM 11.5)

2019-04-05 Thread James Dust 



Kind Regards

James Dust
ICT Network Infrastructure & Communications Engineer





[cid:image005.png@01D17638.0229E040]





55 Bishopsgate, London EC2N 3AS

Telephone: 020 7149 6314 / 07989 491136
Website | 
LinkedIn | 
Twitter


















From: James Dust
Sent: 05 April 2019 11:13
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Cisco TSP Driver & windows 10 (CUCM 11.5)

Morning all,

Apologies if this has been touched on before, I just wondered if anyone else 
has a work around for windows 10 x 64 and using the TSP/TAPI driver.

We have cucm 11.5 and are trying to get a piece of software called 'identapop' 
working with a windows 10 install.

Any help appreciated.

James

Consider the environment - Think before you print

The contents of this email are confidential to the intended recipient and may 
not be disclosed. Although it is believed that this email and any attachments 
are virus free, it is the responsibility of the recipient to confirm this.

You are advised that urgent, time-sensitive communications should not be sent 
by email. We hereby give you notice that a delivery receipt does not constitute 
acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).

Details of Charles Stanley group companies and their regulators (where 
applicable), can be found at this URL 
http://www.charles-stanley.co.uk/contact-us/disclosure/

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Cisco TSP Driver & windows 10 (CUCM 11.5)

2019-04-05 Thread James Dust 
Morning all,

Apologies if this has been touched on before, I just wondered if anyone else 
has a work around for windows 10 x 64 and using the TSP/TAPI driver.

We have cucm 11.5 and are trying to get a piece of software called 'identapop' 
working with a windows 10 install.

Any help appreciated.

James

Consider the environment - Think before you print

The contents of this email are confidential to the intended recipient and may 
not be disclosed. Although it is believed that this email and any attachments 
are virus free, it is the responsibility of the recipient to confirm this.

You are advised that urgent, time-sensitive communications should not be sent 
by email. We hereby give you notice that a delivery receipt does not constitute 
acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).

Details of Charles Stanley group companies and their regulators (where 
applicable), can be found at this URL 
http://www.charles-stanley.co.uk/contact-us/disclosure/

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip