Re: [cisco-voip] TFTP deactivation and reactivation - i recall this was necessary for some reason

Awesome! That’s the one. Nothing to do with decpacks. *phew* -sent from mobile device- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 |

Re: [cisco-voip] TFTP deactivation and reactivation - i recall this was necessary for some reason

Hi Lelio, I found this note from December 2016 from Nick Barnett: "I just thought I would share what happened with this, even though it is super old. Changing the node names to FQDN was mostly painless. The one thing that bit me was bug CSCuy13916. After changing the names of the nodes, the TFTP

[cisco-voip] TFTP deactivation and reactivation - i recall this was necessary for some reason

I'm scheduled to install the latest dev pack on our cluster. Because we're on 11.5(1)su4, we need to restart. I remember some time ago that a restart was not enough for some task execution, and that it actually required deactivating and reactivating the TFTP server to make things work. Does

Re: [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE

Hi, Unfortunately changing the system is not an option. If anyone has any ideas within the parameters of the problem... Thanks Ovidiu On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:49 PM Benjamin Turner wrote: > LOL Nates’s the man! > > > > Sent from Mail for >

Re: [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE

LOL Nates’s the man! Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: cisco-voip on behalf of NateCCIE Sent: Friday, May 24, 2019 3:46:16 PM To: Ovidiu Popa Cc: cisco-voip Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on

Re: [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE

MGCP For EVER! --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca

Re: [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE

Friends don’t let friends use MGCP. You can still use PRI and use SIP between the GW and CUCM. Sent from my iPhone > On May 24, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Ovidiu Popa wrote: > > Hi Tommy > > Good suggestion but I forgot to mention that we are using MGCP. > > Thanks, > Ovidiu > >> On Fri, May 24,

Re: [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE

Hi Tommy Good suggestion but I forgot to mention that we are using MGCP. Thanks, Ovidiu On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 9:15 PM Schlotterer, Tommy < tschlotte...@presidio.com> wrote: > You could use a sip profile if you are using sip: > > > > voice class sip-profiles 100 > > rule 1 request INVITE

Re: [cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE

You could use a sip profile if you are using sip: voice class sip-profiles 100 rule 1 request INVITE sip-header Diversion copy "<(..)" u01 rule 2 request INVITE sip-header To modify "sip:44085551234(.*)" "\u01\1" rule 3 request INVITE sip-header SIP-Req-URI modify "sip:

[cisco-voip] CM routing calls based on facility IE

Hello everyone Does anyone know if CUCM is capable of routing calls based on the information in the ISDN Facility IE ? We tested our provider's call failover scenario and we have the following issue : - The operator enables the failover - All calls from our primary site A to our secondary site B

[cisco-voip] speaking of call recording using BIB...

Has anyone had any luck using a cloud based call recording solution that works with Cisco SIP phones including Jabber? I'm guessing we would setup an (encrypted) SIP trunk to the provider and use the appropriate recording profile on the phones? We're hoping we can get away without having to

Re: [cisco-voip] for those upgrading to 12.5 and use BIB

Wowza! That's not good. Thanks for the heads up. On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 9:13 AM Scott Voll wrote: > For those that are upgrading to CM 12.5 and use call Recording with BIB, > just wanted give you a heads up on a Bug > https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvo36582/?rfs=iqvred > >

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

And done! --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

Done! --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

Please add me too. I’ll be there Kent > On May 24, 2019, at 10:06 AM, Jeremy J Shupick > wrote: > > Please add me to the Webex Teams Space > > > Thanks, > Jeremy Shupick > Network Administrator > Email: jjshup...@wyomingcat.com > > > > > -Original Message- > From: cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

Please add me to the Webex Teams Space Thanks, Jeremy Shupick Network Administrator Email: jjshup...@wyomingcat.com -Original Message- From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of cisco-voip-requ...@puck.nether.net Sent: Friday, May 24, 2019 10:00 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject:

[cisco-voip] for those upgrading to 12.5 and use BIB

For those that are upgrading to CM 12.5 and use call Recording with BIB, just wanted give you a heads up on a Bug https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvo36582/?rfs=iqvred Dumps the CM process. you lose most of all registrations (phones and gateways) when it core dumps and restarts