Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 12 dynamic calendar selection

2020-04-23 Thread Anthony Holloway
Yeah, finding "good" documentation is a challenge for sure. Mainly because it doesn't exist. Also, just in case you were wondering how I found the answer, which by the way, I did not know before you asked, I simply figured out a way to do it, here is how I did it: 1. Create new CCCalendar

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco IOS dial-peers AF31 (default) change to CS3

2020-04-23 Thread Anthony Holloway
I don't know. It both: 1. Looks like it's for SIP only (so not a global dial-peer solution) 2. Looks like it's mapping Resource Priority Headers (RPH) to DSCP values, as opposed to setting DSCP values directly

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco IOS dial-peers AF31 (default) change to CS3

2020-04-23 Thread UC Penguin
There is the dscp-profile command under voice services voip -> sip Never used it but if it’s going to be somewhere I’d expect it to be there. > On Apr 23, 2020, at 14:55, Anthony Holloway > wrote: > >  > Well Scuba Jason, > > IOS has always marked control traffic as AF31, as well as SCCP

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 12 dynamic calendar selection

2020-04-23 Thread Ray Maslanka
Great answer. The§com.cisco.cccalendar.CCCalendar§CCCalendar [id=1]§ value that's set normally through the application shed some clues I but couldn't find any documentation on setting it outside that interface. +5 On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:02 PM Anthony Holloway <

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 12 dynamic calendar selection

2020-04-23 Thread Anthony Holloway
If you click on one of your Calendars in AppAdmin, the URL in your address bar will end with something similar to: /appadmin/calendar/edit.do?calendarId=1 You can take that ID, and use it in a Set step in your script like this: *Variables* CCCalendar target_calendar = null (Parameter) *Script

Re: [cisco-voip] Ported Numbers to SIP call handler transfer is not working correctly.

2020-04-23 Thread Anthony Holloway
Is this a DTMF issue, or a transfer issue? On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 2:51 PM Hamu Ebiso wrote: > Hello team, > > I hope someone have come across this issue and can help me. We ported our > numbers to SIP yesterday. Now, their main menu is not transferring numbers > correctly. For example, when

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco IOS dial-peers AF31 (default) change to CS3

2020-04-23 Thread Anthony Holloway
Well Scuba Jason, IOS has always marked control traffic as AF31, as well as SCCP control traffic for registered media resources. The two things I have seen recommended and done are: 1. Change the settings per dial-peer / sccp config (technically this is ip precedence 3, which aligns loosely

[cisco-voip] Ported Numbers to SIP call handler transfer is not working correctly.

2020-04-23 Thread Hamu Ebiso
Hello team, I hope someone have come across this issue and can help me. We ported our numbers to SIP yesterday. Now, their main menu is not transferring numbers correctly. For example, when you select classifieds, it is supposed to go to the LAC Classifieds call handler. Selecting option 1

[cisco-voip] UCCX 12 dynamic calendar selection

2020-04-23 Thread Ray Maslanka
UCCX 12 provides calendar management through the administrative GUI as well as through a Supervisors Finesse view. Is anyone aware of a way to dynamically associate a particular calendar defined in UCCX to a caller fielded by a script? For example, script1 contains CCCalendar step myCalendar and

[cisco-voip] Cisco IOS dial-peers AF31 (default) change to CS3

2020-04-23 Thread Jason Aarons
CallManager marks control traffic as CS3, but just see that IOS-XE on 4431 16.09.05 marks control as AF31 by default. Is there a global IOS command to change IOS-XE to use CS3 ? Rather then on a per dial-peer level? All my class maps to protect control are based on CS3. Hope all is well here.

Re: [cisco-voip] Renewing Expressway E Cert

2020-04-23 Thread Anthony Holloway
I think I could have written a piece of that better "...which is at a random/unpredictable time, where it will not for port 80 traffic to port 443 for a very specific GET Request to a very specific URL." I think that's better. Anyway, I read it in the documentation, so if what I wrote is

Re: [cisco-voip] Renewing Expressway E Cert

2020-04-23 Thread Anthony Holloway
First and foremost, the document describes how port 80 is used pretty well. It goes on to say that its no less secure than port 443, because the same underlying program/process answers to both, thus is susceptible to the same attacks. People think it's less secure because it's clear text