Can the two phones pass RTP between them to verify that SIP and RTP are
functional?
We have UCExpert which has been in place for many years, but don’t use it for a
whole lot of things due to the interface not being very intuitive.
Brian Palmer| VoiceOps | DC6 3 355
904-905-8263 |
Unfortunately not for the actual media.
You just have to look at codecs negotiated, IP's and RTP packet counts.
This is more remote control manually for testing and troubleshooting.
I remember UnifiedFX did grab and stream the audio.
I think one of the other ones too - like VoipIntegration tools
[cid:D3CE4334-2DFD-4D8D-8E3D-4977B9B838B6]
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 4, 2020, at 3:07 PM, UC Penguin wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do not
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content is safe. If
USB? Just plug it into an ethernet port, you won’t even need a new cable!
> On Jun 4, 2020, at 12:53, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
>
>
> All we would need then is a PRI-to-USB dongle. ;)
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>>> On Jun 4, 2020, at 1:42 PM, Pawlowski, Adam wrote:
>>>
>>
>> CAUTION:
My problem with software based resources is I have seen IOS code upgrades blow
it up. Never seen that with a hardware module at all. I am all for
virtualization for sure. Thing is when you constantly have to upgrade software
for compliance purposes do you want an integral feature to be fail
This is gold right here Adam. Thanks. You've summarized everything very well.
I've run into a few of these things and had forgotten about them.
It's difficult to impress design on someone without quoting technical
limitations. Right now, you've hit the nail on the head with respect to
I have been pushing my shop to reduce the number of shared lines that are in
use in general, and have been banging on that drum for a while. Having your own
line and voicemail meshes better with other services, and keeps your data
separate as far as records, messages, etc as privacy continues
All we would need then is a PRI-to-USB dongle. ;)
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 4, 2020, at 1:42 PM, Pawlowski, Adam wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do not
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content is
Lelio,
Well – maybe. They rescinded video conferencing (and transcoding?) using the
DSPs at some point. Audio transcoding is done in software all day – but the CPU
of the ISR G2 platform at least is not its strong point, it is quickly snowed
in by enough feature processing, records processing,
What are people’s experiences with deploying Jabber with a shared line as the
primary extension?
So, it would be two sets of four devices: botuser1, botuser2, csfuser1,
csfuser2, etc.
But they would all have the same DN.
I doubt that Teams unified client in either CUCM or webex calling
I think my words my have been confusing. When I said "They just don't turn
data into knowledge." I didn't mean Donoma. In fact, I really only was
referring to CDR tools which stop at backing up the call log truck to your
desk and dumping a mountain of records on you for you to sort through.
Back to CUCM on prem in lab via VPN.
The CUCM AWS deployment is out of reach for lab purposes.
That one is basically CUCM on VMWare in AWS (which is like the dedicated
resources) - it's not AWS AMI format.
That said, I've got a great provider here in Australia that does VMWare based
cloud
Hey Anthony:
Would love to hear more from you so we can make sure we are communicating the
capabilities correctly. Feel free to reach out to me directly. I’ll even
throw in some virtual coffee or a virtual lunch for your time.
Feedback from people in the field means more to us than anything…
Feel free to check out our Donoma OneView analytics on a free trial.
(https://www.donomasoftware.com/covid19-response-resources/)
It can pull together data from Call Manager and UCCX too. This is a technical
forum so that's as much as I'll say here - but feel free to reach out to me for
more
Slightly OT.
Recently purchased and stood up some SBCs for a MS Team integration. CUBE
wasn’t an option as the feature wasn’t out of beta.
I’ve been happy with the Ribbon SWe virtual platform. It seems easier to
manage/support than CUBEs.
I’m generally happy with a command line however
Another vote for Variphy, I have several customers that are happy with it.
> On Jun 3, 2020, at 9:00 PM, Brian Meade wrote:
>
>
> Variphy seems to be my favorite so far. I like it much better than the ISI
> offering.
>
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 4:25 PM UC Penguin wrote:
>> I’m curious
16 matches
Mail list logo
