Just fyi VG20x XM end of sale date is April 29, 2022.
Replacement product is VG400 series at a higher price if you just want FXS
ports.
ATA-191 are an option, but the CUCM version doesn’t support power denial.
> On Jan 25, 2022, at 14:43, Adam Pawlowski wrote:
>
> Sort of a derail, but
Sort of a derail, but years ago we tested grandstream and audiocodes devices to
replace the ATA-186. We weren't on 11.5 then and ultimately didn't implement
either.
Devices that provision as "basic" SIP devices in the UCM haven't been any
trouble for basic features. Both devices worked for
Yeah, this is definitely something to consider. We think we can do something
cheaper, until it comes to adding another row to the maintenance schedule.
It's hard in higher ed. We take it as a challenge. But we're never given the
resources to maintain the secondary solution.
I'd not consider
Lelio,
When we were considering this, we were going to have to come up with
some other solution for centralized config. Almost any endpoint will
do centralized config, just not from callmanager. We are capable of
maintaining two systems but we did decide it wasn't worth it.
I could definitely
we moved to vg204's to replace the ata's a long time ago.
Scott
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 6:49 AM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> What’s the advantage of third party ATAs over Cisco branded?
>
> As far as I know, you’d be stuck with a third party SIP device which has
> little centralized configuration
What’s the advantage of third party ATAs over Cisco branded?
As far as I know, you’d be stuck with a third party SIP device which has little
centralized configuration options. Centralized upgrades and true failover are
top of my list. Oh, and I’m not a pro, but from what I understand, they
Anyone using Call Manager 11.5 or greater and successfully using a non-Cisco
ATA device? We need to upgrade several 186s and looking at options.
Thanks in advance...
Lisa Notarianni
University of Scranton
Telecommunications Engineer
Infrastructure Services
800 Linden St.
Scranton PA 18510
