Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE - Dial-peer multiple destination-pattern matching

2015-10-26 Thread Ryan Huff
A couple of items to keep in mind; 1.) Can only be used on VOIP dial peers 2.) When you have multiple pattern matches, the match with the longest prefix is considered the matching criteria which does not necessarily have to be the most specific match.

Re: [cisco-voip] 3rd Party backup tools

2015-10-26 Thread Ryan Huff
While it is more than NOT supported; I have had success with cloning ucos vm's (while powered off). Then powering on the clones with the parents turned off. Again, clearly not supported but I have not noticed any behavior differences. For kick's and curiosity's sake I have vmotioned a lab

Re: [cisco-voip] How Many Docs Does it Take to Prep for an Upgrade?

2015-10-20 Thread Ryan Huff
nd Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 From: "Ryan Huff" <ryanh...@outlook.com> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <le...@uoguelph.ca> Cc: "Kevin Przybylowski" <kev...@advancedtsg.com>, "Anthony Holloway" <avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>, "

Re: [cisco-voip] How Many Docs Does it Take to Prep for an Upgrade?

2015-10-18 Thread Ryan Huff
isco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of >> Anthony Holloway >> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 3:42 PM >> To: Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> >> Cc: Cisco VoIP Group <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> >> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] How Many Docs Does

Re: [cisco-voip] Video Design Guide

2015-10-18 Thread Ryan Huff
Yes, I live on my iPad ... I have issues, I know. I think the architecture guide you referenced is very good, especially the "Basic Video Concepts" section. For a learner just starting with video I might suggest something even more digestible and agnostic, just to get the feet wet with

Re: [cisco-voip] How Many Docs Does it Take to Prep for an Upgrade?

2015-10-17 Thread Ryan Huff
Here is the Excel spreadsheet that I use during UC upgrades. Don't beat me up too bad ;) it is a collection of 'O wait, I need that too's'; it could probably use some consolidation / tweaking. This is the version 1. In the 'version 2' I am making I am adding a testing plan section and I

Re: [cisco-voip] 79xx Ring in name display

2015-10-17 Thread Ryan Huff
in all call-flow scenarios or just one of these scenarios; - pstn->phone - ip phone to ip phone - when the call is forwarded from another ip phone or call is answer via line group Thanks, Ryan > On Oct 17, 2015, at 8:40 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> wrote: > > Hello Ma

Re: [cisco-voip] 79xx Ring in name display

2015-10-17 Thread Ryan Huff
Hello Martin, On your ingress gateway/trunk, do you have "Display IE Delivery" or "Connected Name Presentation" checked/allowed (respectively)? Thanks, Ryan From: m...@bilobit.com To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 10:25:26 + Subject: [cisco-voip] 79xx Ring in name

Re: [cisco-voip] Video Architecture

2015-10-17 Thread Ryan Huff
In my experience, I find the largest resistance to video from the customer's perspective is that it is still a "board room" or "conference room" feature. I think the industry is still a while off from video being adopted at the desk, or rather being used frequently at the desk. I have had

Re: [cisco-voip] How Many Docs Does it Take to Prep for an Upgrade?

2015-10-16 Thread Ryan Huff
I use an excel spread sheet with a hyperlink to the base doc in one sheet with notes and details gathered in the sheet.Then I create additional worksheets of subordinate documentation and notes and then make references from the base sheet to the subordinate sheets. I also have a sheet for

Re: [cisco-voip] How Many Docs Does it Take to Prep for an Upgrade?

2015-10-16 Thread Ryan Huff
Yeah, I am mobile at the moment,  Once I get home I'll clean one up and send it out to the list. Thanks, Ryan Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device Original message From: Terry Oakley <terry.oak...@rdc.ab.ca> Date:10/16/2015 3:05 PM (GMT-05:00) To: 'Ryan Huff'

Re: [cisco-voip] How Many Docs Does it Take to Prep for an Upgrade?

2015-10-16 Thread Ryan Huff
Holloway <avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> Date:10/16/2015 3:41 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> Cc: Cisco VoIP Group <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] How Many Docs Does it Take to Prep for an Upgrade? You sound more organized than I am.  I

Re: [cisco-voip] Outbound IVR-UCCX and CUBE

2015-10-15 Thread Ryan Huff
Long shot here but have you double checked that voice activity detection (VAD) is off? Thanks, Ryan From: nickolasjbr...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:14:59 +1100 To: rlafo...@cisco.com Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Outbound IVR-UCCX and CUBE CC: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Sorry to Grave

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco CAR DB not running

2015-10-14 Thread Ryan Huff
Is it just sitting in the Starting state? Is this the only service that won't start? Everything else in the cluster seems healthy (i.e no replication issues, the CM Server list reflects the new IP address, dns forward/reverse zones resolve the new address ... etc)? Thanks, Ryan > On Oct 14,

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.5 and Exchange 2013 voicemail setup.

2015-10-13 Thread Ryan Huff
Terry, Sounds like you have a lot going on there! How did you move into the 10.5 environment?  Did you do a bridge migration or a 'stare and compare'? A fast busy could be a few different things (css, partition ... etc) or dns based since you mentioned fqdn or resource based. What codec are

Re: [cisco-voip] slips on NIM-8MFT-T1/E1

2015-10-11 Thread Ryan Huff
-routers/118792-config-isr-00.html Sent from my iPad > On Oct 11, 2015, at 1:18 AM, Jonathan Charles <jonv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I put the primary in and set the input source... still getting slips... > > > Jonathan > >> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 11:08 PM

Re: [cisco-voip] slips on NIM-8MFT-T1/E1

2015-10-11 Thread Ryan Huff
primary clock 0, secondary clock 255, ntwk_clk_selected No, ntwk_clk_participate Yes, current clock = 0PLL status= 1, and cntl = 7 ILNOVOIPISR01# Jonathan On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> wrote: What is the output of show platform hardware subslot 0/1

Re: [cisco-voip] slips on NIM-8MFT-T1/E1

2015-10-11 Thread Ryan Huff
d clock selection process is enabled Please unconfigure G.781 based > configuration before configuring network-clock participate config command > ILNOVOIPISR01(config)# > > > > Jonathan > >> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> wrot

Re: [cisco-voip] slips on NIM-8MFT-T1/E1

2015-10-11 Thread Ryan Huff
PM, Jonathan Charles <jonv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The slips cleared up and I am not sure why it may be that there are no > calls on them... > > Thanks! > > > Jonathan > >> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> w

Re: [cisco-voip] slips on NIM-8MFT-T1/E1

2015-10-11 Thread Ryan Huff
> > ILNOVOIPISR01(config)#network-clock synchronization participate 0/1 > Slot 0 subslot 1 is already enabled for network clocking. Command Aborted. > ILNOVOIPISR01(config)# > > > > Jonathan > >> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.

Re: [cisco-voip] slips on NIM-8MFT-T1/E1

2015-10-10 Thread Ryan Huff
This is how I've setup clocking on 4th gens before, and it always seems to use the line as the clock source when I have done it this way (network clock synchronization is disabled by default, so you may double check that it is enabled). Using your slot reference ... rtr(config)#

Re: [cisco-voip] slips on NIM-8MFT-T1/E1

2015-10-10 Thread Ryan Huff
I got some time tonight to take a look if you'd like ... Are all 10 pri's from the same carrier? Can you send me a sh run, sh isdn status and a sh controllers T1. Also, a q931/q921 debug for a call would be helpful (even if it is a failed call). Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device

Re: [cisco-voip] DRS Backups 10.5

2015-10-08 Thread Ryan Huff
I think the best option is (and has been for awhile, imho) to spin up or box your favorite Linux flavor with openssh (Arch, Ubuntu, Debian) come to mind. Not hard to setup at all and they just run, almost a set-it-and-forget-it. -Ryan Sent from my iPad > On Oct 8, 2015, at 11:05 AM, Jason

Re: [cisco-voip] Using speed dials to access features

2015-10-08 Thread Ryan Huff
I should further add my suggestion would mean removing the line on the phone and creating it as a hunt pilot and then putting a pseudo number on the phone in place of the line, as the line group member. Sent from my iPad > On Oct 8, 2015, at 2:54 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com&

Re: [cisco-voip] Using speed dials to access features

2015-10-08 Thread Ryan Huff
Off the top (and this is by no means elegant); 1.) Create a hunt group with the pilot's CFWNA action to forward to the cell phone (using a Pstn egress patter). 2.) Make the line a member of the line group serviced by the hunt list/hunt group. 3.) Use an Hlog button on the phone to toggle

Re: [cisco-voip] CDR on CM 10.5.2.12901-1

2015-10-08 Thread Ryan Huff
Nothing I am aware of. I would verify the CDR Flag Enable is enabled on ALL nodes. Thanks, Ryan Sent from my iPad > On Oct 8, 2015, at 2:05 PM, Scott Voll wrote: > > Any bugs on this version with CM not sending CDR's to reporting server? > > our Reporting vendor is

Re: [cisco-voip] Background url

2015-10-06 Thread Ryan Huff
I believe you need to specify the fully qualified tftp path; at least you did when I last played with it.Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device Original message From: "Louis Koekemoer (ZA)" Date:10/06/2015 5:02 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Justin Steinberg

Re: [cisco-voip] switch version from CUCM 9.1(1) to 10.5(2)

2015-10-06 Thread Ryan Huff
My suspicion (and this is just a guess really, without more detail); is that after the 10.5 update was applied, but before the switch version was completed, changes where made to the data in the 9.1 version. When staging an upgrade in the inactive partition, changes made to the database in the

[cisco-voip] Odd call behavior CME,CUBE,CUCM

2015-10-05 Thread Ryan Huff
I have CME that has a SIP phone registered to it and a SCCP phone registered to it. SIP=4002 SCCP=4001 I have a call path that looks like: CUCM->SIPTrunk->CUBE->SIPTrunk->CME When I dial the SIP phone (on CME) from call manager the call completes and goes fine. When I dial the skinny phone

Re: [cisco-voip] Odd call behavior CME,CUBE,CUCM

2015-10-05 Thread Ryan Huff
-Config-CME-8-Help-with-Incoming-calls-on-SIP On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> wrote: I have CME that has a SIP phone registered to it and a SCCP phone registered to it. SIP=4002 SCCP=4001 I have a call path that looks like: CUCM->SIPTrunk->CU

Re: [cisco-voip] ldaps authentication

2015-10-05 Thread Ryan Huff
Ed, You may need to make sure that the common name of the ldap server also appears in the subject alternative name (SAN) of the certificate. ldap dirsync will come from the cucm publisher node but ldap auth could potentially come from any cucm node. My other thoughts besides a cert issue

Re: [cisco-voip] ldaps authentication

2015-10-05 Thread Ryan Huff
I expected. Double checking dns on the other cm nodes is good idea - i'm pretty sure they are all using the DNS but close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades as they say. I forgot that the secondary nodes were able to do auth on their own. On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...

Re: [cisco-voip] ldaps authentication

2015-10-05 Thread Ryan Huff
here's any way to remove the wildcard, I'd suggest doing that. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 5, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> wrote: When it comes to ssl integrations with CCM, I tend to subscribe to the idea that the "integrators" should play by the sa

Re: [cisco-voip] ILBC

2015-10-04 Thread Ryan Huff
nan <james.buchan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I never said anything about your psychological condition since anyone in > Cisco voice must be a little off-kilter, but you are most welcome. > >> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> wrote: >&

Re: [cisco-voip] ILBC

2015-10-04 Thread Ryan Huff
eral/collaboration-endpoints/unified-ip-phone-7962g/prod_qas0900aecd80699c20.html. > >> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> wrote: >> Having some issues with a 7941 refusing ILBC and preferring G711ULAW >> (despite proper region/device pool con

[cisco-voip] ILBC

2015-10-04 Thread Ryan Huff
Having some issues with a 7941 refusing ILBC and preferring G711ULAW (despite proper region/device pool config) and I think I know why, just looking for a confirmation here really As I read it from;

Re: [cisco-voip] Presence status for third party app

2015-10-02 Thread Ryan Huff
Rob, Not sure what you're looking to do, but I have written an abstracted API layer in PHP to do things such as; text/email when contact is available/away ... Etc. I can share if interested. Right now I am working on a script for when a contact goes away and the the away status exists for

Re: [cisco-voip] 3650 PoE Issue

2015-09-30 Thread Ryan Huff
You may also try increasing the poe advertisement length on the port ( power inline delay shutdown 20 initial 300 ).  Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device Original message From: "Casper, Steven" <scas...@mtb.com> Date:09/30/2015 5:18 PM (GMT-05:00) To: 'R

Re: [cisco-voip] 3650 PoE Issue

2015-09-30 Thread Ryan Huff
How much available power do you have left on the POE backplane once all phones are up and working? From: scas...@mtb.com To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:33:51 + Subject: [cisco-voip] 3650 PoE Issue Having an issue related to PoE negotiation between 3650

Re: [cisco-voip] 10.5 DRS Restore problem?

2015-09-25 Thread Ryan Huff
Usually means you are attempting a restore from an incomplete backup set. Is the backup set you are attempting restore with, from a successfully completed DRS backup of a like ucos version? Also, check the file permissions on your backup set and make sure the sftp user can read them. Thanks,

Re: [cisco-voip] LDAP error on CUC

2015-09-24 Thread Ryan Huff
I'm assuming that you have performed a directory synchronization in Unity Connections first, then attempted the import (and the local Unity Connections account name matches the AD account name). Thanks, Ryan Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:45:25 -0500 From: jonv...@gmail.com To:

Re: [cisco-voip] LDAP error on CUC

2015-09-24 Thread Ryan Huff
with. Thanks, Ryan Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device Original message From: Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> Date:09/24/2015 12:01 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Jonathan Charles <jonv...@gmail.com>,cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] LDAP error on CUC

Re: [cisco-voip] Feature Request to fix Licensing issues with EM

2015-09-17 Thread Ryan Huff
://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/udat/userguide/UDAT_BK_U1401523_00_device-assignment-tool-user-guide.html On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> wrote: Scott, The DLU <-> CUWL license model change was and continues to be a significant change f

Re: [cisco-voip] Feature Request to fix Licensing issues with EM

2015-09-17 Thread Ryan Huff
Scott, The DLU <-> CUWL license model change was and continues to be a significant change for customers; no arguments there. However, once you make it to the other side, the CUWL licensing model makes a lot more sense and is ultimately easier to manage and predict usage. Having said that;

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 9 EM agents cant login

2015-09-16 Thread Ryan Huff
association been done already. No luck. From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] Sent: 15 September 2015 18:46 To: ealeather...@gmail.com; abba...@gmail.com Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 9 EM agents cant login If the cti service in ccm has lost the state of the

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 9 EM agents cant login

2015-09-15 Thread Ryan Huff
From: abbas wali <abba...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 05:54 PM To: 'Ryan Huff' <ryanh...@outlook.com>,ealeather...@gmail.com Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] UCCX 9 EM agents cant login CC: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > > >This doesn’t make any sense .. > >

Re: [cisco-voip] Phantom tomcat-trust cert

2015-09-15 Thread Ryan Huff
What I have done in the past that that has worked is delete the cert on the pub first and then restart the tomcat service. Then do each sub node the same. Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: James Andrewartha Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 9 EM agents cant login

2015-09-15 Thread Ryan Huff
com> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 01:36 PM To: abbas wali <abba...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 9 EM agents cant login CC: Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com>,Cisco VOIP <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> >I've had some weird, rare occasions where i've had to disassoci

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 9 EM agents cant login

2015-09-15 Thread Ryan Huff
any issues. Even I can do it on my CIPC But these new 3 agents cant. From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] Sent: 15 September 2015 15:05 To: abbas wali <abba...@gmail.com>; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] UCCX 9 EM agents cant login Assuming this isn't a new/u

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 9 EM agents cant login

2015-09-15 Thread Ryan Huff
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] UCCX 9 EM agents cant login Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:21:03 +0100 Sorry that will mean !! From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] Sent: 15 September 2015 15:18 To: abbas wali <abba...@gmail.com>; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [ci

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 9 EM agents cant login

2015-09-15 Thread Ryan Huff
know, if want to get traces from RTMT which option should I use i.e. Cisco Call Manager will suffice ? thanks From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] Sent: 15 September 2015 14:35 To: abbas wali <abba...@gmail.com>; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] UCCX 9 EM

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 9 EM agents cant login

2015-09-15 Thread Ryan Huff
Since you mention using extension mobility When the Agent logs in with their Ex. mobility profile, does the DN happen to be on another IP phone? The only way to "share" an ACD extension between multiple devices is to assign it to a Device Profile exclusively and then login using Extension

Re: [cisco-voip] MRA (Collaboration Edge) Intrusion Protection

2015-09-15 Thread Ryan Huff
I almost upgraded our VCS servers to 8.6 last week and noticed a couple reviews on CCO so I stuck with 8.5.3. I’ll give 8.6.1 a try in a few days. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Huff Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 4:00 PM To: bmead...@

Re: [cisco-voip] MRA (Collaboration Edge) Intrusion Protection

2015-09-14 Thread Ryan Huff
Brian I had this issue this weekend in 8.6. My original issue was the "no home uds cluster" but I had issues with the proxy protocol violation. Tac's response was go to 8.6.1 (released 9/11/15 ... yikes) or roll back to 8.5 Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Brian

[cisco-voip] Expressway mra with webex connect config but not used

2015-09-13 Thread Ryan Huff
A word on using the mobile jabber clients with mra when webex connect is configured on the domain (but isn't being used and can't be turned off for one reason or another) ... The only way I was able to get the provisioning URL to work for the mobile clients (so the clients will exclude WebEx

Re: [cisco-voip] Error when SSHing into CUCM 10.5

2015-09-03 Thread Ryan Huff
So this is less a CUCM error as it is actually an issue with RedHat (OS). Basically, your platform administrator account is roached (doesn't have the right permissions) and when you try to log in -SELinux is spanking you. When you installed the patch, did you install with out a switch-version

Re: [cisco-voip] Error when SSHing into CUCM 10.5

2015-09-03 Thread Ryan Huff
Also, if you are able to login into OS Administration (GUI) with the platform administrator account, but just can't SSH then you may be missing the /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/users/sshout_u file. If you can get into the root account (had it previously enabled before the failed patch), you

[cisco-voip] IM DRS Restore Question

2015-08-31 Thread Ryan Huff
I have an 8.4 HA Presence cluster that I am doing a DRS restore on. The question I have is regarding contact lists. Will I recover all the user contact lists and data by restoring just the primary node or do I need to also restore the failover node (rather than just rebuild a new failover) to

Re: [cisco-voip] Service Provider SIP Trunks

2015-08-28 Thread Ryan Huff
Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Ryan Huff ryanh...@outlook.com Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 05:12 PM To: amichaelba...@hotmail.com Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Service Provider SIP Trunks As long as you didn't change anything on the cpe side, it may be more likely your

Re: [cisco-voip] Service Provider SIP Trunks

2015-08-28 Thread Ryan Huff
Sounds like a codec/media issue. Are you supporting early offer? Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Aaron Banks amichaelba...@hotmail.com Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 03:35 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] Service Provider SIP Trunks I have a

Re: [cisco-voip] IP Phone 7970 Firmware

2015-08-26 Thread Ryan Huff
: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Damisch, Kevin Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 9:13 AM To: Ryan Huff ryanh...@outlook.com; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IP Phone 7970 Firmware Strange. You can’t browse for it, but Google found

[cisco-voip] IP Phone 7970 Firmware

2015-08-26 Thread Ryan Huff
Is it just me not finding 7970 listed on CCO? ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] BE6k NIC Teaming / Etherchannel question

2015-08-25 Thread Ryan Huff
On as well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dhxqlH_0_I On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:04 AM Ryan Huff ryanh...@outlook.com wrote: The flavor of VMWare that comes with the BE6/7k only has the ability to use a vSwitch, not a distributed vSwitch due the differences in licensing (Enterprise Plus

[cisco-voip] BE6k NIC Teaming / Etherchannel question

2015-08-25 Thread Ryan Huff
The flavor of VMWare that comes with the BE6/7k only has the ability to use a vSwitch, not a distributed vSwitch due the differences in licensing (Enterprise Plus being what enables the ability to use a distributed vSwitch). According to this VMWare KB article;

Re: [cisco-voip] Recent post regarding CUBE / SIP Profiles to remove video from SDP

2015-08-24 Thread Ryan Huff
Not sure which post you are referencing but here is what I have used in the past and it worked for me; voice class sip-profiles XXX request INVITE sdp-header Video-Attribute remove request INVITE sdp-header Video-Media modify m=video(.*) request INVITE sdp-header Video-Bandwidth-Info remove

Re: [cisco-voip] 3905 dial tone problem

2015-08-20 Thread Ryan Huff
Ah . derivitive of the studder good stuff Brian, totally forgot about that. Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Brian Meade bmead...@vt.edu Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 10:55 PM To: Jason Aarons (AM) jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com Subject: Re: [cisco-voip]

Re: [cisco-voip] 3905 dial tone problem

2015-08-20 Thread Ryan Huff
I believe that is correct, the actual audible tone comes from the phone, triggered to play through signaling from the call control server. Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: NateCCIE natec...@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 07:21 PM To: 'Ryan Huff' ryanh

Re: [cisco-voip] 3905 dial tone problem

2015-08-20 Thread Ryan Huff
My thoughts ... Maybe switch to the inactive load and test as a quick-fix. Is this the only sip endpoint in this CME that is impacted? Are there SCCP endpoints and if so, do they have the same issue? Can customer complete a dial and does the issue continue once connected? Thanks, Ryan

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP analog gateways

2015-08-19 Thread Ryan Huff
My experince is that analog faxing over SIP is sometimes a dance. What I have found to work consistently is to disable SuperG3 and ECM on the fax modem and restrict the rx/tx of the modem to 14.4 Kbps. Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Haas, Neal nh...@co.fresno.ca.us

Re: [cisco-voip] route to two dial peers simultaneously in ios voice gateway

2015-08-17 Thread Ryan Huff
You may try a hunt group/broadcast and put both DNs in seperate partitions. Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Jacky Cai jacky...@gmail.com Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2015 09:49 PM To: VOIP Group cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] route to two dial peers

[cisco-voip] Expressway compatibility info

2015-08-06 Thread Ryan Huff
Looking for a concise compatibility matrix for Expressway c/e and cucm. I've found various deployment scenario docs which specify CUCM versions in the prereq's leading me to believe there are compatibility requirments but I have not found them yet. Any ideas?

[cisco-voip] License Mac / Answer File Generator question

2015-08-04 Thread Ryan Huff
Trying to use the answer file generator for CUCM 8.6 and it generates the files, but I don't see a pre-generated license MAC any ideas? ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

[cisco-voip] Strange 10.x licensing issue

2015-07-24 Thread Ryan Huff
Had a healthy, licensed 5 node cluster. Some Telepresence units were added and that put the PLM out of compliance, clearly. So the TP licenses were added (using the built in auto-pak fill tool)and that brought the TP license shortage back into compliance BUT put basic messaging, essential and

Re: [cisco-voip] PCD download Bootable?

2015-07-21 Thread Ryan Huff
Scot, It comes pre-installed on the BE6/7K. The other option is to get it e-delivered from the PUT tool (using a valid contract). There are alternative methods to getting non-bootable ISOs to work but I cannot endorse them as the are not supported. Thanks, Ryan Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:01:50

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM IMP and postgress database instances

2015-07-21 Thread Ryan Huff
Lelio, Yes you need an external instance of postgresql. I find that Ubuntu works best. Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 12:37 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM IMP and postgress

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM IMP and postgress database instances

2015-07-21 Thread Ryan Huff
in the database? --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 le...@uoguelph.ca www.uoguelph.ca/ccs Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 From: Ryan Huff ryanh

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM IMP and postgress database instances

2015-07-21 Thread Ryan Huff
Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 le...@uoguelph.ca www.uoguelph.ca/ccs Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 From: Ryan Huff ryanh...@outlook.com To: Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca Cc: cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM IMP and postgress database instances

2015-07-21 Thread Ryan Huff
If you need/want any additional assistance just unicast me. Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 02:52 PM To: Ryan Huff ryanh...@outlook.com Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM IMP and postgress database instances CC

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM IMP and postgress database instances

2015-07-21 Thread Ryan Huff
If you need/want any additional assistance just unicast me. Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 02:52 PM To: Ryan Huff ryanh...@outlook.com Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM IMP and postgress database instances CC

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM translation pattern postfix digits

2015-07-20 Thread Ryan Huff
Well Lelio, that is what you get for trying to do digit manipulation on a napkin in between wings! Lol Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 09:22 PM To: Ryan Huff ryanh...@outlook.com,natec...@gmail.com Subject: Re

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM translation pattern postfix digits

2015-07-20 Thread Ryan Huff
Nate, I am not by my Linux machine (refuse to use winblows) to vet this but could you do: *5XXX with a CPTM of XXX3101 with a prefix of 8? Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: NateCCIE natec...@gmail.com Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 08:08 PM To: 'Cisco VOIP'

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM translation pattern postfix digits

2015-07-20 Thread Ryan Huff
Xlate : *5XXX (CPTM: 8XXX) Route Pattern: 8XXX (CPTM: 3101 Prefix: 8XXX) - Route list/group to h.323 gateway that uses a ccm call processing node as the ip address of the gateway. It could be the IPA talking but that sounds like it should work? Thanks,

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM translation pattern postfix digits

2015-07-20 Thread Ryan Huff
From: Ryan Huff ryanh...@outlook.com Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 08:27 PM To: natec...@gmail.com,cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM translation pattern postfix digits Nate, I am not by my Linux machine (refuse to use winblows) to vet this but could you do: *5XXX

Re: [cisco-voip] 10.5.2 Certificate bug

2015-07-18 Thread Ryan Huff
Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to be a visionary to see it. – Sheldon Cooper Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Room From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Huff Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 4:10 PM To: cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] 10.5.2 Certificate bug

2015-07-17 Thread Ryan Huff
So this bug cost me 2 hours last night .. one of the more ridiculous ones I have seen in awhile. 10.5.2; the Subject Alternative Name in the CSR can't be the same as the CN (although that is how most CA's will generate). The work around? Add a space character at the end of the CN when you

Re: [cisco-voip] External Call from Movi Client to Conductor fails after 5 sec

2015-07-15 Thread Ryan Huff
Sounds like a codec issue. Are both sides negotiating the same codec? Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Robert Schuknecht rschukne...@gmx.de Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 09:37 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] External Call from Movi Client to

Re: [cisco-voip] firefox upgrade causing issues with CUCM CCMadmin page

2015-07-10 Thread Ryan Huff
Here is the Cisco security advisory for the OpenSSL flaw found in June/2015 Long, Long list of products affected: http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150612-openssl -Thanks, Ryan From: ryanh...@outlook.com To: dennis.h...@wwt.com;

Re: [cisco-voip] Shared Line Appearances on SIP Phones

2015-07-10 Thread Ryan Huff
If you are talking about line side, I don't believe so. Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 07:11 PM To: Cisco VoIP Group cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] Shared Line Appearances on SIP Phones By

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber Contact shows wrong IM Address

2015-07-09 Thread Ryan Huff
Have you tried: Set calendar integration in the client none Sign out/Close the client. Remove the jabber cache again ~/appdata/local , /appdata/roaming Log the client back in and set your calendar integration back to its original setting. Thanks, Ryan Original Message

Re: [cisco-voip] New 8851 Phones

2015-07-09 Thread Ryan Huff
Have you enabled always use prime line for the phone? Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Haas, Neal nh...@co.fresno.ca.us Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2015 10:32 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] New 8851 Phones So we got some 8851 phones into test. Only

Re: [cisco-voip] firefox upgrade causing issues with CUCM CCMadmin page

2015-07-09 Thread Ryan Huff
Here is a good explanation of the issue and how to work around it: http://eltonoverip.com/blog/2015/07/firefox-39-0-ssl-error-weak-ephemeral-diffie-hellman-key/ From: dennis.h...@wwt.com To: wo...@justfamily.org; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 19:53:09 + Subject: Re:

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 8841/51 not sending DTMF...

2015-07-07 Thread Ryan Huff
...@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2015 07:44 PM To: Ryan Huff ryanh...@outlook.com Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 8841/51 not sending DTMF... CC: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net I am SCCP to CUC; SIP to SIP for PSTN (SIP trunk to CUBE, SIP trunk to CL) On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Ryan Huff ryanh

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 8841/51 not sending DTMF...

2015-07-07 Thread Ryan Huff
: Tuesday, July 7, 2015 08:20 PM To: Ryan Huff ryanh...@outlook.com Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 8841/51 not sending DTMF... CC: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Just RTP-NTE on the gateway... verified dial peer matched... On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Ryan Huff ryanh...@outlook.com wrote

Re: [cisco-voip] LDAP Authentication when CUCM publisher is down.

2015-07-06 Thread Ryan Huff
You are correct about LDAP Authentication, needs the publisher to be up. I think SAML SSO is just CUCM and CUIMP and it rides on top of LDAP syncronization but I could be wrong brcause I don't play with SAML SSO that often. Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Matthew

Re: [cisco-voip] LDAP Authentication when CUCM publisher is down.

2015-07-06 Thread Ryan Huff
My suspicion is it has to do with controlling the number of queries being issued and from where or perhaps and more specifically, tracking the failover itself. Once the failover occurred, the identity of the cucm-side ldap sync would change and AD servers might not handle that gracefully. I

Re: [cisco-voip] LDAP Authentication when CUCM publisher is down.

2015-07-06 Thread Ryan Huff
Hi Dan! Thanks for the clarification/correction I just happen to have a few 3-node cluster hanging around and I just tried this 5 times in a mix of 9.1.1, 10.0 and 10.5 and here is what I found: 3 times LDAP auth was a seamless failover to the sub 2 times LDAP auth did not work on the

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 8841/51 not sending DTMF...

2015-07-06 Thread Ryan Huff
Are you sip to cuc ab d the pstn? If so, what is your dtmf support in your trunks? Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Jonathan Charles jonv...@gmail.com Sent: Monday, July 6, 2015 04:11 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco 8841/51 not sending DTMF...

Re: [cisco-voip] LDAP Authentication when CUCM publisher is down.

2015-07-06 Thread Ryan Huff
access to the pub and see what happens. And then another test where the ACL blocks access to the LDAP server temporarily. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 6, 2015, at 10:04 AM, Ryan Huff ryanh...@outlook.com wrote: Hi Dan! Thanks for the clarification/correction I just happen to have a few

[cisco-voip] Cisco Unity Express bulk PIN reset

2015-07-01 Thread Ryan Huff
I imagine there are a few ways to attack this but I thought I would share the method I just used. I needed to reset the PIN for ALOT of CUE accounts and didn't have much time to research so I just cooked up a PHP script for it.

Re: [cisco-voip] CUACA 10.5 Call Park and Blind Transfer issue

2015-06-26 Thread Ryan Huff
Is this a greenfield or a break/fix? I would first check the obvious stuff; Correct Device Pool/Region/Location/PT/CSS used on the CTI Ports?Does the call drop as soon as it is parked/transferred OR only once the call is connected to the called phone? If it is the latter, may be a

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >