Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

2016-06-29 Thread Ryan Huff
From: Wes Sisk (wsisk) <ws...@cisco.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 6:56 PM To: Ryan Huff Cc: Damisch, Kevin; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller alternatively looks like the FXO port might be configured to to tone disc

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

2016-07-01 Thread Ryan Huff
t. I see in the Viking manual that upon being answered, it plays call-waiting tones to indicate which door is calling. I don’t know if Cisco FXO ports have any particular behaviour in response to call-waiting tones. But might be worth looking into. -mn From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook

Re: [cisco-voip] IM Renew tomcat and ipsec certificates

2017-02-06 Thread Ryan Huff
Not sure which version you have but here is the Security Certificate Management chapter for version 10: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/cucos/10_0_1/CUCM_BK_C2F2626C_00_cucm-os-admin-guide-100/CUCM_BK_C2F2626C_00_cucm-os-admin-guide-100_chapter_01101.html Another good

Re: [cisco-voip] Cluster setup with 2 Subs - Sub 2 did not pick up the load.

2017-01-30 Thread Ryan Huff
I realize you mentioned the IP addresses of the communications manager servers were listed in the phone's trust list however; keep in mind that if DNS/FQDNs are being used, the phones will also have to be able to resolve those FQDNs (otherwise, you'd likely experience something very similar to

Re: [cisco-voip] Panic Button Solution?

2017-01-30 Thread Ryan Huff
While this still in allows for 2-way communication; an interim solution until the Informacast server is available again (that is your best option) is to have the far end phone auto answer on speaker and do a local side route pattern with a unique steering digit. Outside of that and assuming

Re: [cisco-voip] Cluster setup with 2 Subs - Sub 2 did not pick up the load.

2017-01-30 Thread Ryan Huff
r 1 --> Sub 1 and TFTP server 2 --> Sub 2 When I manually change TFTP server 1 to point to Sub 2 it asks me to erase the ITL, does that sound right ? Thx Gary From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] Sent: Monday, 30 January 2017 11:42 PM To: Nathan Reeves <nathan.a.ree...@gmail.com&l

Re: [cisco-voip] Moving calls to/from jabber apps

2017-02-18 Thread Ryan Huff
There might be a mobility play there for your manager with audio (via the cellphone), but not a Jabber video call. On Feb 18, 2017, at 4:30 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi > wrote: So, if someone answers a Jabber call on their mobile phone (via jabber client)

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway blues

2017-02-17 Thread Ryan Huff
gt; wrote: > > Single interface. > On a public IP BTW. > > > Ryan Huff @ 17/02/2017 20:48 -0300 dixit: >> How is your expressway E server configured? Single interface or door >> interfaces? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Feb 17, 20

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway blues

2017-02-17 Thread Ryan Huff
way. If you have a pointer to a doc for tshooting, or arquitecture, or ... I'd really appreciate it. Thanks! Ryan Huff @ 17/02/2017 21:00 -0300 dixit: Expressway servers on a stick are not fun. You should note, that using dual interfaces on the expressway E server is the recommended solution. Is th

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM settings

2017-02-10 Thread Ryan Huff
Depends on what type of "settings" you're talking about. From a 10,000 foot view, I'd say you could probably go to the bulk administration tool and use the general import export tool to dump out the enterprise parameters ... etc. Thanks, Ryan > On Feb 10, 2017, at 5:57 PM, cisco.voip

[cisco-voip] Flexible JID / MRA

2017-02-15 Thread Ryan Huff
Has anyone got Flexible JID to work via MRA for the Jabber client's INITIAL, registration? FJID is working fine internally for INITIAL registration (and then the bootstrap is cached with the actual user ID so after that, doesn't really matter). J4W 11.8 Exp c/e 8.7.1 CUCM / imp 11.0.1 (No

[cisco-voip] Flexible JID / MRA

2017-02-15 Thread Ryan Huff
Has anyone got Flexible JID to work via MRA for the Jabber client's INITIAL, registration? FJID is working fine internally for INITIAL registration (and then the bootstrap is cached with the actual user ID so after that, doesn't really matter). J4W 11.8 Exp c/e 8.7.1 CUCM / imp 11.0.1 (No

Re: [cisco-voip] vg224 registered to two different Cm's

2017-01-17 Thread Ryan Huff
My guess is either RIS or DNS resolution is acting wonky for the gateway. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 17, 2017, at 2:45 PM, Scott Voll > wrote: sh ccm shows they resolve and are registered to the sub and backup to the pub. That is the wierd

Re: [cisco-voip] Flexible JID / MRA

2017-02-27 Thread Ryan Huff
ssword field which it doesnt allow you to log in with, if you then change it to user id you can log in? Anyone else come across this? Regards Nick On 15 February 2017 at 18:15, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Has anyone got Flexible JID to wor

Re: [cisco-voip] Curiosity: New IP Communicator

2017-02-28 Thread Ryan Huff
Mobile Remote Access. At a 10,000 foot view; a way to register Cisco Jabber clients and Cisco IP 8800/7800 to Communications Manager without VPN (replaces phone proxy and phone vpn). It involves Cisco Expressway (VCS) servers that are configured like a standard reverse internet proxy (called

Re: [cisco-voip] Curiosity: New IP Communicator

2017-02-28 Thread Ryan Huff
Arguably, one of the coolest licensing things Cisco has done in awhile ;). Sent from my iPhone On Feb 28, 2017, at 4:35 PM, Brian Meade > wrote: MRA is free now so just need to request the Expressway licensing through PUT. On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:15

Re: [cisco-voip] Curiosity: New IP Communicator

2017-02-28 Thread Ryan Huff
ave to stick to the exact search rule they give you for it to not consume RMS licensing. On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: The caveat to the free license, even in version 8.9 I believe, is that if you do any sort of tra

Re: [cisco-voip] Curiosity: New IP Communicator

2017-02-28 Thread Ryan Huff
The caveat to the free license, even in version 8.9 I believe, is that if you do any sort of transform on the expressway (such as using a abbreviated dial pattern in call manager and then transforming it into the appropriate WebEx suffix domain in expressway C) does consume a RMS license.

Re: [cisco-voip] Flexible JID / MRA

2017-02-27 Thread Ryan Huff
ot supported. I'll log a case and get it added to the enhancement. Regards Nick On 27 February 2017 at 12:14, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: I can confirm that FJID is not supported over MRA. There is a bug ID for an enhancement request. It's only

Re: [cisco-voip] Are there any gotchas to watch out for switching to FQDN server names from IP address server names?

2016-08-31 Thread Ryan Huff
e to an FQDN, and assuming I have my cert chain signed properly and deployed, hopefully the end user will NOT see these cert warnings any more. Does that sound about right? On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Nick, If the

Re: [cisco-voip] CME-SRST question

2016-09-04 Thread Ryan Huff
anyone have a working configurations for CME-SRST or even SRST with SIP phones, please share. Many thanks Best Regards Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman Senior Network Engineer From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] Sent: Sunday, September 4, 2016 12:12 AM To: Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman <ahmed.rah.

Re: [cisco-voip] CME-SRST question

2016-09-03 Thread Ryan Huff
Can you send us the output of: - # sh run | sec voice service voip|voice register|dial-peer voice|tftp-server -# dir Additional questions: - What is the model of SIP phone? - What CUBE hardware platform? - What IOS / IOS-XE code version? Thanks, Ryan On Sep 3, 2016, at 4:34 PM, Ahmed Abd

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO Disconnect Detection

2016-09-11 Thread Ryan Huff
From: Hughes, Scott GRE-MG <shug...@grenergy.com> Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2016 7:13 PM To: Ryan Huff Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO Disconnect Detection :-/ unfortunately, that command must already be a default is IOS 15.5M b

Re: [cisco-voip] Phone Fraud H.323

2016-09-11 Thread Ryan Huff
Hi David, * Did the telco say that the calls were originated from your POTS trunks or were they responding to customer complaints that one of your numbers had been reported to them for fraud ... etc? * Does this router have a public Internet facing interface? * Does this router

Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5 version

2016-09-12 Thread Ryan Huff
ESor SU: 1-9 8.6.2.1-30 (FCS) 8.6.2.22900-1 (ESor SU look at last three digits) (zzz) FCS:000, ES: 001-899, SU: 900-999 8.6.2.2-2 (FCS) 8.6.2.21001-1 (ES) 8.6.2.22900-1 (SU) Best regards, Ovidiu On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber for Windows 11.7 and Locations Woes

2016-09-13 Thread Ryan Huff
Anthony... W10/J4W 11.7 (BUILD 42920) here and for kicks I put myself on a new subnet was prompted for a new location name; I went back to the previous subnet and it displayed my original location. Is one of the users able to temporarily change subnets (or nat their virtual adapter in the case

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX Queuing and Over flow Queueing Best Practice

2016-09-08 Thread Ryan Huff
the lower tier queues. Again, you would just want to be clear and document exactly how this may impact reporting. Can you provide clarity on the end-goal? Sent from my iPhone On Sep 8, 2016, at 4:32 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Max, As Br

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Trunk Profile w/ Options Ping

2016-09-08 Thread Ryan Huff
Hi Joe, The SIP Options Request (page 66-67 of RFC 3261 or page 29-30 of its predecessor RFC 2543) is a fantastic mechanism that is often (and sadly) under used being reduced in many cases, to something the tune of a,

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO Disconnect Detection

2016-09-09 Thread Ryan Huff
You may try enabling support for battery reversal detection on the voice port; voice-port x/x/x battery-reversal ! -Ryan > On Sep 9, 2016, at 6:57 PM, Hughes, Scott GRE-MG wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a Cisco 2921 H.323 gateway tied to CUCM 11 with 4 FXO (loop start) >

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Trunk Profile w/ Options Ping

2016-09-09 Thread Ryan Huff
there a way to exclude the OPTIONS pings when debugging SIP in IOS ? For instance when using a debug ccsip messages, it would be awesome if the OPTIONS messages could be excluded from the debug output. On 9/8/2016 10:11 PM, Ryan Huff wrote: Hi Joe, The SIP Options Request (page 66-67 of RFC 3261<

[cisco-voip] cucm 10.5 version

2016-09-12 Thread Ryan Huff
Just spotted 10.5.2.14060-1 on a cluster ... CCO only shows up to 10.5.2.13901-2 ( 10.5(2)SU3a ). Anyone know if 10.5.2.14060-1 is a deferment or an engineering special ... etc? Thanks, Ryan ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5 version

2016-09-12 Thread Ryan Huff
899, SU: 900-999 On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: So I imagine it is SU4 ... I was just wondering why it is not listed on CCO. There have been times, where a new release is listed but then removed due to deferment.

Re: [cisco-voip] one way voice issue

2016-09-30 Thread Ryan Huff
From: naresh rathore <nare...@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 9:39 AM To: Ryan Huff; cisco voip Subject: Re: one way voice issue hi Ryan, i have long weekend to resolve the issue. i can't define the hq public ip for global bind because ip sec vpn at spoke use the hq pub

Re: [cisco-voip] one way voice issue

2016-09-30 Thread Ryan Huff
all phone segments. This could potentially allow you to 'weather the storm' and get you to a maintenance window where you could tackle it properly. Thanks, Ryan From: naresh rathore <nare...@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 8:41 AM To: Rya

Re: [cisco-voip] ISR 4431 - Need to configure "clock source internal" on PRI interface , get error

2016-10-05 Thread Ryan Huff
rted on the NIM-xCE1T1-PRI for data without the keyword voice-dsp." Hope this helps, -Ryan On Oct 5, 2016, at 6:49 AM, Russell Chaseling <rchasel...@plannet21.ie<mailto:rchasel...@plannet21.ie>> wrote: Hi Ryan, I take it channel-group for data only? Sorry never used

Re: [cisco-voip] ISR 4431 - Need to configure "clock source internal" on PRI interface , get error

2016-10-05 Thread Ryan Huff
ovide them the clock, I like Brian have not figured out that part of the 4K voodoo. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 27, 2015, at 7:23 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Brian, You'll essentially be doing the same thing as you would have in the ISRG2 but

Re: [cisco-voip] Upgrade from 10.5.2 ->11.5.1

2016-10-06 Thread Ryan Huff
I would also add that, even if you do let PCD run wild, at best it is another server to setup and get working (assuming new PCD install and not re tasking an existing) on top of reading the PCD guides ... etc. So even if it all goes perfect, you're still down the time it takes to get PCD up

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Cluster SU install + device Package

2016-08-28 Thread Ryan Huff
The primary reason for a cluster reboot after a device package install is to refresh the RIS Data Collector, TFTP, Tomacat, A Cisco DB (and one other ... I think) services; which is needed when the device package includes the installation of device model support not previously supported. If the

Re: [cisco-voip] Future of Jabber .......

2016-10-02 Thread Ryan Huff
That said, there will be significant changes to the way the jabber for iPhone client operates with iOS 10 next year. I suggest all who are able, to watch the briefing if they have not already. -Ryan On Oct 2, 2016, at 12:23 PM, Joshua Warcop > wrote:

Re: [cisco-voip] Not supported I'm sure..... but what do you think?

2016-10-25 Thread Ryan Huff
Matthew is correct, copying is listed as "Supported with Caveats" at: http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Communications_VMware_Requirements; The caveat being found at http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Communications_VMware_Requirements#Copy_Virtual_Machine The VM needs to be powered

Re: [cisco-voip] Not supported I'm sure..... but what do you think?

2016-10-27 Thread Ryan Huff
llo...@gmail.com> on behalf of Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 12:02 PM To: Ryan Huff Cc: Matthew Loraditch; Tommy Schlotterer; Scott Voll; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Not supported I'm sure. but what

Re: [cisco-voip] Not supported I'm sure..... but what do you think?

2016-10-29 Thread Ryan Huff
ld version (secondary subs) >> 1 TFTP - old version (secondary TFTP) >> >> Phone registers to upgraded primary subs, once everything >> working/stable/tested, flip remaining (secondary nodes) >> >> Maybe too complex for this split version to be workable, or n

Re: [cisco-voip] IM IM Logs

2016-11-10 Thread Ryan Huff
ber 10, 2016 8:19 AM To: Ryan Huff Cc: Nick via cisco-voip Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IM IM Logs Yes. We have an postgresql db. Looking for a front end to search IM. Regards Dana Tong - Yell IT ENTERPRISE SECURITY ENTERPRISE NETWORKING ALL THINGS CLOUD m. 0416 165 030 f. 07 3059 6354 e.

Re: [cisco-voip] IP Phone Ports

2016-11-10 Thread Ryan Huff
Steven ... correct, by plugging in the PC Port to the switch as well, you would be sending BPDUs back into the switch. So as long as BPDU guard is enabled on the switch ports, then doing this would err-disable both switch ports (the one the PC Port and Network Port is plugged into). Pretty

Re: [cisco-voip] IM IM Logs

2016-11-10 Thread Ryan Huff
My recommendation isn't an all-in-one For call recording, can you use MediaSense? Easy to setup and works fairly well (using BiB or SPAN based recording). For IM search; are you saying you have the 3rd party database now, and are looking for away to search the database? Sent from my

Re: [cisco-voip] CCX 11.5 Upgrade Issues

2016-10-22 Thread Ryan Huff
There is an ES for 11.5 FYI; not sure if any of your upgrade issues are covered in the ES ... but TAC may lead you down that path. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 22, 2016, at 11:09 AM, Matthew Loraditch > wrote: So I did

Re: [cisco-voip] Not supported I'm sure..... but what do you think?

2016-10-31 Thread Ryan Huff
h naming things so you can safely script things in a low-risk fashion (E.g., so you can't reboot the wrong set of VMs while working on build #2) -Peter On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: As it always has, IMO

Re: [cisco-voip] Unusual configuration

2016-11-01 Thread Ryan Huff
Aaron, == Jabber == You mention, "intermittent jabber problems high number of SIP register events ... call is not successful". Where are you seeing this, I'm guessing here but, ccsip messages in the gateway debugs? When the Jabber client is attempting to make a call, I'm assuming your

Re: [cisco-voip] CXN 9.1.2.14900-661 Garbled Messages

2016-11-02 Thread Ryan Huff
on.aar...@dimensiondata.com>> wrote: The ntp server was a 6509 with "ntp master 10" setup. However the delay/offset/jitter are both high to that 6509. I changed it to ntp master 2 and will monitor RTMT for syslog alerts. From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] Sent: Wednesday,

Re: [cisco-voip] CXN 9.1.2.14900-661 Garbled Messages

2016-11-02 Thread Ryan Huff
Jason, Fix NTP then restart conversation manager primary first, the HA. Find a IOS router for now, if you can, and host a local ntp master at Strata 2 for the primary. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 2, 2016, at 2:45 PM, Jason Aarons (AM)

Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 157, Issue 2

2016-11-03 Thread Ryan Huff
Keep in mind that a region, only specifies the maximum bandwidth, but does not necessarily indicate that a call will use up to the maximum bandwidth codec configured for that region. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 3, 2016, at 9:15 AM, Nilson Costa

Re: [cisco-voip] Activation Code for 8845

2016-10-10 Thread Ryan Huff
Costas, This usually would come about (as Stephen mentions) when the phone either does not get a TFTP definition from DHCP or, is not able to communicate to the TFTP definition that it did get. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 10, 2016, at 4:38 AM, costas georgiou

Re: [cisco-voip] Call Recording with CUCM9.1

2016-12-01 Thread Ryan Huff
Cisco MediaSense is a great (and admittedly, simple) option for BIB recording; just need to purchase the RTU and put it on some virtual hardware. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 1, 2016, at 9:17 AM, Brian Meade > wrote: You're probably much better using

Re: [cisco-voip] Are there any gotchas to watch out for switching to FQDN server names from IP address server names?

2016-12-01 Thread Ryan Huff
Anthony and James have highlighted one of the greater weaknesses of thinking like an engineer. As an engineer, we look at TFTP service interruption and see all the potential outcomes and things that could happen. We think about a firmware download being interrupted on an endpoint and realize

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS

2017-01-03 Thread Ryan Huff
eir own VLAN so its not as bad. In the future it won’t be that way but for the time being it is. Ben Amick Telecom Analyst From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 9:18 PM To: Ben Amick <bam...@humanarc.com<mailto:bam...@humanarc.com>> Cc: Nate

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS

2017-01-03 Thread Ryan Huff
It's a shame really ... MPLS is far superior IMO, for many reasons. Call it iWAN, DMVPN, AutoVPN whatever, it is still as Nate says, public Internet. Try getting a 30 or 60 minute SLA with escalation after 15 minutes from a public Comcast or Time Warner/Charter package. On Jan 3, 2017, at

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco CER Licensing?

2016-12-30 Thread Ryan Huff
Anthony, out of curiosity did your situation involve CSF/TCT/BOT devices and CER based device discovery? Sent from my iPhone On Dec 30, 2016, at 6:43 PM, Anthony Holloway > wrote: I'm going to love seeing this

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS

2017-01-04 Thread Ryan Huff
oip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> on behalf of Ben Amick <bam...@humanarc.com<mailto:bam...@humanarc.com>> Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 11:18 AM To: Evgeny Izetov; Ryan Huff Cc: Cisco VoIP Group Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS Evgeny, That’s great, and I

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS

2017-01-03 Thread Ryan Huff
y have to do an analysis of it, as we're having just random periods here and there where calls just have horrible quality, of the type you normally see fixed by QoS Ben Amick Telecom Analyst From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 8:40 PM To: NateCCIE <nat

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco CER Licensing?

2016-12-31 Thread Ryan Huff
isco-v...@gmail.com>> wrote: Yes, yes it did. The ratio is somewhere like 80/20 hardphone/softphone. On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 5:56 PM Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Anthony, out of curiosity did your situation involve CSF/TCT/BOT devices and CE

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco CUCM SME - Call Forking

2016-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
Hi Mark. The SME? No, I do not believe so as the SME is really just a CUCM node at the end of the day. -R > On Dec 20, 2016, at 12:18 PM, Mark Holloway wrote: > > Hi all. Can SME fork SIP Invites to two different destinations? For example a > call originates from the

Re: [cisco-voip] CAD Timers for breaks

2016-12-28 Thread Ryan Huff
y 95% of our trouble tickets after hours are due to incorrectly followed documentation. Including the troubleshooting and checking your steps. *sigh* Sent from my iPhone On Dec 27, 2016, at 3:18 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: IMO; th

Re: [cisco-voip] CAD Timers for breaks

2016-12-27 Thread Ryan Huff
IMO; this is a human/HR problem and isn't something UCCX is suited to solve. -R On Dec 27, 2016, at 3:07 PM, Ben Amick > wrote: So I received a request from some of my supervisors - they're irritated that they constantly have to police users

Re: [cisco-voip] Need help with call failure

2017-03-23 Thread Ryan Huff
Is this a new implementation or an in-flight system that recently developed this issue? A couple of things here: 4xx messages are client related messages while 5xx are server related. Your debug only shows evidence of a 403 (forbidden). I would verify that the user agent credentials are

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber voicemail issue only on IPhone

2017-03-23 Thread Ryan Huff
rch 23, 2017 5:59 AM To: Ryan Huff Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber voicemail issue only on IPhone hi, Thanks for the reply, I already checked the Digest user and manually assigned it to correct user but havent checked the enable sip digest authentication. will

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber voicemail issue only on IPhone

2017-03-23 Thread Ryan Huff
In the TCT device profile for the Jabber iPhone; please verify that "Digest User" under "Protocol Specific Information" is set to the correct owning user and "Enable Sip Digest Authentication" is set to "Enable" under "Product Specific Configuration Layout". Thanks, Ryan On Mar 23, 2017, at

Re: [cisco-voip] Fwd A Number

2017-03-22 Thread Ryan Huff
Assuming the unassigned DN is marked active. -Ryan From: cisco-voip on behalf of Ben Amick Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 11:32 AM To: David Zhars Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re:

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber voicemail issue only on IPhone

2017-03-23 Thread Ryan Huff
il service profile. From: Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 10:13 AM To: Ryan Huff; naresh rathore Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber voicemail issue only on IPhone Huh, maybe I'm not rec

Re: [cisco-voip] 8845's cannot make outbound calls

2017-03-31 Thread Ryan Huff
conf t (config)# voice-port0/0/0:23 (config-voiceport)# bearer-cap speech exit wr mem Sent from my iPhone On Mar 31, 2017, at 2:52 PM, Nick Britt > wrote: Just ran into this one Topology: 8845 > CUCM 8.6 > H323 GW > T1 >

Re: [cisco-voip] 8845's cannot make outbound calls

2017-03-31 Thread Ryan Huff
on the handset in case you actually did want to use video for onnet calls or through trunks but do support video payloads. Thanks, Ryan On Mar 31, 2017, at 3:26 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: conf t (config)# voice-port0/0/0:23 (conf

Re: [cisco-voip] CUIC Reporting

2017-03-20 Thread Ryan Huff
You could create a "null queue" for each option that does nothing more than passthru the transfer to the intended destination. Then you could run reports on the "null queues" for how many calls come in to them. This is not very elegant and wouldn't scale very well, but works in limited

[cisco-voip] FN for ASA/FTD

2017-04-03 Thread Ryan Huff
I realize ASA/Firepower doesn't have much to do with voice organically, however, it does often participate with voice traffic flows so it worth making sure the list sees the field notice for ASA 9.x FTD 6.x. Basically, devices running the impacted versions of code may (read that as "it probably

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber Push Notifications for iPhone and iPad

2017-04-06 Thread Ryan Huff
Anthony, I think it is. When you log into the Spark admin portal it calls itself "Cloud Collaboration Management Interface". I also think it is being used as a fluid moniker to describe all the things that are being added and changed (like how the WebEx and Spark backends are converging).

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber Push Notifications for iPhone and iPad

2017-04-06 Thread Ryan Huff
Otherwise, you'll need your own web proxy. On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Anthony, I think it is. When you log into the Spark admin portal it calls itself "Cloud Collaboration Management Interface".

Re: [cisco-voip] BAT Phone Insert Issue

2017-04-13 Thread Ryan Huff
Yeah, the column headers for the CSVs change often between versions; required fields added, fields removed or renamed ... etc. My suggestion is to generate a "sample" export of the data set you're trying to import, using the 10.5.2 BAT. Then, copy/paste the relevant columns from your CSV that

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.X

2017-04-13 Thread Ryan Huff
Not knowing how or where you acquired your original demo licenses (or if you were just running on the initial 60 day grace period); you could visit https://cisco.com/go/license and select "Demo and evaluation" from the "Get Other Licenses" selector for "Unified Communications Products". It

Re: [cisco-voip] far end camera control (additional ports?)

2017-03-08 Thread Ryan Huff
Lelio, FECC is UDP 3 -3 This is from the 10.6 planning guide: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/jabber/10_6/planning-guide/CJAB_BK_CD3376A0_00_cisco-jabber-106-planning-guide/CJAB_BK_CD3376A0_00_cisco-jabber-planning-guide_chapter_011.html#CJAB_RF_P3DE6354_00 This

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway MRA question

2017-03-12 Thread Ryan Huff
Ahmed, The Expressway cluster (C or E) can have 6 member nodes (1 primary and 5 subordinate peer nodes). Here is the clustering guide for 8.7 (but all versions have an equivalent guide):

Re: [cisco-voip] Change IM address scheme

2017-03-10 Thread Ryan Huff
If it's still greyed out then one or more of the nodes is still reporting that one of those services is enabled. In certain older versions I've seen this happen even when the services were all disabled but because they were not disabled in the same order shown in the guide. Sent from my

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber / CTI and DNS/LDAP

2017-03-08 Thread Ryan Huff
Adam, I have had this happen before as well and came to the same eventual analysis too. My DNS were BIND VMs; what I did was add a second virtual NIC to the secondary DNS and gave it the primary's IP address (because my DNS servers were in two separate segments). Once the original was good,

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber 11.8 and XIAOMI MI smart phones

2017-03-01 Thread Ryan Huff
No they are not. However, I wouldn't re-sew the pants (CCM) to fit the wallet (XIAOMI) Sent from my iPhone On Mar 1, 2017, at 2:34 PM, Rasim Duric > wrote: We hit an issue with XIAOMI smart phones and Jabber 11.8. The Jabber phone service is

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber 11.8 and XIAOMI MI smart phones

2017-03-01 Thread Ryan Huff
No they are not. However, I wouldn't re-sew the pants (CCM) to fit the wallet (XIAOMI) Sent from my iPhone On Mar 1, 2017, at 2:34 PM, Rasim Duric > wrote: We hit an issue with XIAOMI smart phones and Jabber 11.8. The Jabber phone service is

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM LDAP integration question

2017-04-18 Thread Ryan Huff
Hi Ahmed, You're on the right track, you can sync multiple forests/directories but you can only bind against one schema. Might be time to look outside of AD for authentication (SSO). Thanks, Ryan Sent from my iPhone On Apr 18, 2017, at 5:50 AM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM LDAP integration question

2017-04-18 Thread Ryan Huff
t? Best Regards Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman Senior Network Engineer From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 1:32 PM To: Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman <ahmed.rah...@bmbgroup.com<mailto:ahmed.rah...@bmbgroup.com>> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-vo

Re: [cisco-voip] how long to let expressway updates bake

2017-07-17 Thread Ryan Huff
Not sure what you're referring to by "sit"? Are you referring to a hardware burn-in of the host chassis the guest VM is running on? During the non-production period, is the business using it to validate its configuration and usability for its specified business case? Usually, once UAT (User

Re: [cisco-voip] how long to let expressway updates bake

2017-07-17 Thread Ryan Huff
would be how long do I let other Cisco customers find any serious issues before I would hop on. Wait for the "a" revision to drop. was typical back in the day. not sure if expressway had the same history. On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 7.5 TO CUCM 11 Migration

2017-07-09 Thread Ryan Huff
Asim, What type of software do your call center agents use; UCCX, Attendant Console, or just using specialized treatment within CUCM 7.5? Thanks, Ryan On Jul 9, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Asim Mekki Basheer > wrote: Hello we have CUCM 7.5 and

Re: [cisco-voip] Clearing DNS cache on Unity 10.5

2017-07-10 Thread Ryan Huff
Sometimes bouncing tomcat services on all nodes will help. I'd try that first, "Utils service restart Cisco Tomcat" -Ryan On Jul 10, 2017, at 6:51 PM, "norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca" > wrote:

Re: [cisco-voip] 8841 no power connecting to 4510/4748

2017-07-10 Thread Ryan Huff
it show up CDP? Thanks, Ryan From: cisco-voip on behalf of Hendrix, Bill W. - US Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:14 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] 8841 no power connecting

Re: [cisco-voip] 8841 no power connecting to 4510/4748

2017-07-10 Thread Ryan Huff
sco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net> on behalf of Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:28 PM To: Hendrix, Bill W. - US; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 8841 no power connecting to 4510/4748 it show up CDP? Thanks, Ryan F

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 7.5 TO CUCM 11 Migration

2017-07-10 Thread Ryan Huff
, at 12:21 PM, Asim Mekki Basheer <asim_...@hotmail.com<mailto:asim_...@hotmail.com>> wrote: Hello Ryan we are using UCCE but CUCM 7.5 will not touch we will only migrate corporate ext form cucm 7 to cucm 11 Thanks ASIM ____ From: Ryan

Re: [cisco-voip] how long to let expressway updates bake

2017-07-18 Thread Ryan Huff
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Huff Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 3:28 PM To: Tim Frazee Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] how

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX Custom Call Variables - Script to Script Transfers

2017-07-18 Thread Ryan Huff
I assume you are looking for a solution solely within the confines of ccx/cuic, without invoking the assistant of CUCM? Sent from my iPhone On Jul 18, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Anthony Holloway > wrote: I'm working on a menu

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX Custom Call Variables - Script to Script Transfers

2017-07-18 Thread Ryan Huff
Holloway <avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com<mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>> wrote: Yes, but I'll hear what you have to say nonetheless. On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:23 PM Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: I assume you are looking for

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP to Multicast Device

2017-07-20 Thread Ryan Huff
Brian, Check out their 8301 paging adapter: http://www.algosolutions.com/products/audible-and-visual-alerting.html Sent from my iPhone On Jul 20, 2017, at 12:11 PM, Brian Meade > wrote: Anyone know of a device that will register with CUCM via SIP or

Re: [cisco-voip] Informacast SNMP error with UCM

2017-07-20 Thread Ryan Huff
Just throwing this out as something to try before a cluster reboot "utils diagnose test" see if the ntp or reverse DNS test modules hiccup. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 20, 2017, at 11:46 AM, Wes Sisk (wsisk) > wrote: From Syslog, we can see lot of

Re: [cisco-voip] Force an outgoing call through a subscriber

2017-07-21 Thread Ryan Huff
So the actual media (RTP) will never flow through a CUCM server; it may however, terminate a connected media stream on a software based MTP application that CUCM runs as a service (IP Voice Media Streaming Application). Signaling (SIP) on the other hand, will always traverse a CUCM server. If

Re: [cisco-voip] Force an outgoing call through a subscriber

2017-07-23 Thread Ryan Huff
re all doing that. On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:53 PM Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: So the actual media (RTP) will never flow through a CUCM server; it may however, terminate a connected media stream on a software based MTP application that CUCM runs as a

Re: [cisco-voip] um, where'd the scheduled backups go in PLM

2017-06-29 Thread Ryan Huff
gt; Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure > Computing and Communications Services (CCS) > University of Guelph > > 519-824-4120 Ext 56354 > le...@uoguelph.ca > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs > Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building > Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 > > >

Re: [cisco-voip] um, where'd the scheduled backups go in PLM

2017-06-27 Thread Ryan Huff
Are you dealing with a standalone PLM? If it's co-res, you'd just backup the PLM feature in the normal CUCM DRS. For standalone, you should be able to use all the normal CLI DRS utilities (or activate the CUCM application for the purpose of accessing DRS). Thanks, Ryan On Jun 27, 2017, at

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >