Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber Phone Services Issue (when connect externally)

2018-02-01 Thread Ryan Huff
Everything still good with the internal _cisco-uds SRV record? Can the EXP-C resolve this in DNS? What shows in the event log of EXP-E/C when Jabber MRA registration is attempted? Thanks, Ryan Sent from my iPhone On Feb 1, 2018, at 7:27 PM, naresh rathore

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber Phone Services Issue (when connect externally)

2018-02-01 Thread Ryan Huff
gs and error. it seems like i have to reboot exp c. Regards Naray ____ From: Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Sent: Friday, February 2, 2018 5:47 AM To: naresh rathore Cc: up Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber Phone Serv

Re: [cisco-voip] one way audio after SIP cupover

2018-02-06 Thread Ryan Huff
sed in dial peers)." Since this feature is just for signaling, and the call does establish, this wouldn't be the cause of an RTP issue, and you wouldn't be putting your media addresses in here. Do you agree with both of those remarks, or did I misunderstand something? On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 5:14 PM

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 7975 or 7965 stuck at speaker button Red LED, sorry if this is a repost

2018-02-11 Thread Ryan Huff
Have a look at this field notice: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/field-notices/637/fn63772.html Sent from my iPhone On Feb 11, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Vinnie Dao > wrote: HI Anthony, Appreciated your reply, The link you sent requires

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 7975 or 7965 stuck at speaker button Red LED, sorry if this is a repost

2018-02-11 Thread Ryan Huff
to:vin...@tdnetwork.com>> wrote: What a bummer, Seems like they are dead. No hope? Thank you very much everyone and have a great Sunday From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2018 10:09 AM To: Vinnie Dao Cc: Anthony Holloway; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<ma

Re: [cisco-voip] MTP or not MTP on sip trunk

2018-02-22 Thread Ryan Huff
Have a read through this thread: https://supportforums.cisco.com/t5/ip-telephony/issues-with-cucm-sip-trunk-and-hold/td-p/2395620 Sent from my iPhone On Feb 22, 2018, at 13:23, Jonatan Quezada > wrote: and if so, do I need to

Re: [cisco-voip] MTP or not MTP on sip trunk

2018-02-22 Thread Ryan Huff
Here here! MTP is basically creating a known rendezvous point that both call legs can reach and there is a guard at the gate that says, “pay no mind to the man behind the curtain, it’s just magic”. traces and debugs would show you what’s going on but you got to go through a ton more effort to

Re: [cisco-voip] Enabling CUCM/WebEx/B2B - firewall’ing thoughts?

2018-08-01 Thread Ryan Huff
Yep CMR calling from on-prem endpoint is little more than a B2B call. You’ll want to follow the WebEx guide though, and setup the dedicated DNS zone as it does deviate from the standard DNS zone a little. As long as the x...@site.webex.com URI (whether it’s a PMR or

Re: [cisco-voip] Rejistered to Sub, Rejected on Pub

2018-08-03 Thread Ryan Huff
Odd. - Can one of those phones actually register to the publisher? - Maybe bounce the RIS DB service? Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 3, 2018, at 13:41, Jonathan Charles wrote: > > So, in CUCM12, we are seeing devices rejistered fine to their primary CCM, > but if you log into the Publisher,

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP

2018-08-10 Thread Ryan Huff
___ From: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 10:02:42 PM To: Benjamin Turner Cc: Loren Hillukka; cisco-voip voyp list Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP Is it a PA, ASA? Do you have inspection and ALG disabled on the firew

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP

2018-08-10 Thread Ryan Huff
o voice-class sip outbound-proxy dtmf-relay rtp-nte sip-notify no vad ! ! sip-ua ! Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 ____ From: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 10:04:54 PM

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP

2018-08-10 Thread Ryan Huff
Benjamin Turner Cc: Ryan Huff; cisco-voip voyp list Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP Just confirming when you changed the bindings in IOS, did you change the SIP trunk destination IP address in CUCM to point to the inside address of CUBE and reset the trunk? Sent

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP

2018-08-10 Thread Ryan Huff
apture traffic from outside interface IP and ISP IP. That was my next step to open up the trust list. Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> ____ From: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 11:11:59 PM To: Benjam

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP

2018-08-10 Thread Ryan Huff
From: Loren Hillukka mailto:lchillu...@hotmail.com>> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 9:58:49 PM To: Benjamin Turner Cc: Ryan Huff; cisco-voip voyp list Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP Any firewall in place there? I have seen firewalls modify/drop just enough to

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP

2018-08-10 Thread Ryan Huff
e from cube. Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> From: Bill Talley mailto:btal...@gmail.com>> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 11:08:15 PM To: Benjamin Turner Cc: Ryan Huff; cisco-voip voyp list Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP r

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP

2018-08-10 Thread Ryan Huff
jamin Turner mailto:benmtur...@hotmail.com>> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 10:27:31 PM To: Ryan Huff Cc: Loren Hillukka; cisco-voip voyp list Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP This is strange. The monitor capture on the cube sees the 1xx responses but my debug does

Re: [cisco-voip] "*" makes the SIP provider put a person on hold, or something like that

2018-08-09 Thread Ryan Huff
So was he answering on speaker or something and the call picked up an audio artifact from the PC speaker? With regards to the carrier, I have not heard of anything like that in terms of a standards based behavior. Could be a special/ specific carrier feature / capability that was provisioned

Re: [cisco-voip] recovery disk - what's it worth?

2018-08-23 Thread Ryan Huff
The recovery.iso is only good for a variety of boot/disk block and partition issues. It won’t help you if your DR was like “UCS server xyz lost 2 disks in a RAID5”. That is an new VM build and a drs restore ... etc (not that other methods don’t exist *nods at Mr. Snapshot and Mr. clone*,

Re: [cisco-voip] MRA getting served up publisher as TFTP server after upgrade from v9 to v11

2018-07-17 Thread Ryan Huff
Was it an “in place” upgrade? If not check if anything changed with the CM Groups during the upgrade. Sometimes people just upgrade the publisher, and build in new subscribers (if this happened, I’d also make sure any custom MoH files are on all nodes and not just the publisher). When you do

Re: [cisco-voip] No longer able to change Jabber username on reset (recent change, upgrade from CUCM 9 to CUCM 11.5)

2018-08-30 Thread Ryan Huff
Sounds like UPN behavior... This comes as part of the default UPN (User Principal Name) behavior (v11.something and onward) of the user logged into the Windows PC. You can turn it off with a command line switch during installation but for the time being, a cache reset/clear on the client will

Re: [cisco-voip] No longer able to change Jabber username on reset (recent change, upgrade from CUCM 9 to CUCM 11.5)

2018-08-30 Thread Ryan Huff
Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook From: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Sent: Thursday, Augus

Re: [cisco-voip] No longer able to change Jabber username on reset (recent change, upgrade from CUCM 9 to CUCM 11.5)

2018-08-30 Thread Ryan Huff
h Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook From: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh

Re: [cisco-voip] No longer able to change Jabber username on reset (recent change, upgrade from CUCM 9 to CUCM 11.5)

2018-08-30 Thread Ryan Huff
56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook From: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2018 5:01 PM To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelp

Re: [cisco-voip] dialing WebEx from CUCM/Expressway

2018-08-29 Thread Ryan Huff
Keep an eye on RMS usage if you do that though. Webex calls on Expressway are only supposed to be free if the call isn’t transformed or manipulated by Expressway (not sure if that changed in 8.11 though). Sent from my iPhone On Aug 29, 2018, at 11:35, Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>

Re: [cisco-voip] weird behaviour when dialing webex personal room SIP URI when logged into (webex) meetings tab in Jabber

2018-09-04 Thread Ryan Huff
Is the coy...@uoguelph.ca URI a saved call back in your PMR (if it is, remove it then test)? Since the WebEx Meeting tab is just making REST calls to Webex, it seems like something is picking up on that session and “thinking” that you are trying call yourself. If you

Re: [cisco-voip] No longer able to change Jabber username on reset (recent change, upgrade from CUCM 9 to CUCM 11.5)

2018-09-04 Thread Ryan Huff
r Mobile clients. Clicking the notification lets the user download the app from Google Play or the Apple App Store. You can configure this notification using the EnablePromoteMobile parameter. This parameter is enabled by default. On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 4:27 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@out

Re: [cisco-voip] weird behaviour when dialing webex personal room SIP URI when logged into (webex) meetings tab in Jabber

2018-09-05 Thread Ryan Huff
NP%2BCdyxveTcY%3D=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook From: Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 8:31 PM To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>; Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber Phone Mode - Login ID

2018-09-05 Thread Ryan Huff
So for the UDS integration which is what it sounds like you’re doing; the userid field is what you have. If your user’s have an Active Directory, and the sAMAccountName and domain name of the user’s AD profile match the user’s email address convention, the fix would be to simply integrate CUCM

Re: [cisco-voip] Webex hybrid call service connect unable to find user

2018-09-06 Thread Ryan Huff
I would grab some pcaps and diag logs Is your MTLS setup correctly? Sent from my iPhone On Sep 6, 2018, at 06:34, Dana Tong mailto:dana.t...@yellit.com.au>> wrote: Further to this. When I search all users, the user is present but it looks like he controls many phones which is odd. I’ve

Re: [cisco-voip] Webex hybrid call service connect unable to find user

2018-09-06 Thread Ryan Huff
When you added the WebEx Board, did you select Hybrid Calling for PSTN calling? Also, the WebEx Board device, needs represented as an end user in cucm with a uri for the OBTP feature to work. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 6, 2018, at 20:31, Dana Tong mailto:dana.t...@yellit.com.au>> wrote: So

Re: [cisco-voip] Webex hybrid call service connect unable to find user

2018-09-10 Thread Ryan Huff
e mailto:bmead...@vt.edu>> Sent: Friday, 7 September 2018 9:25 PM To: Dana Tong mailto:dana.t...@yellit.com.au>> Cc: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>>; cisco-voip voyp list mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Webex hybrid call service conn

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Hybrid Services Expressway Connector registration

2018-08-31 Thread Ryan Huff
On Aug 31, 2018, at 06:55, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: No, it shouldn’t, stateful egress should be fine (what goes out, comes back in the same way). However, since you say you have a PA ... I'm guessing it is doing something weird that isn’t expected. Layer 7 fir

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Hybrid Services Expressway Connector registration

2018-08-31 Thread Ryan Huff
Something is in its way to the Internet ... web filter perhaps? Asymmetrical route somehow? Expressway-C is a diva when it comes to having Internet access for the Hybrid connectors. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 31, 2018, at 02:47, Dana Tong mailto:dana.t...@yellit.com.au>> wrote: FYI it also

[cisco-voip] e911

2018-03-07 Thread Ryan Huff
I wonder how cloud-based phone system like Cisco spark will answer this? https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/karis-law-you-compliant-edgar-salazar Sent from my iPhone ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] e911

2018-03-07 Thread Ryan Huff
..@gmail.com>> Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 2:22 PM To: Matthew Loraditch <mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com<mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com>> Cc: NateCCIE <natec...@gmail.com<mailto:natec...@gmail.com>>; Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:rya

Re: [cisco-voip] e911

2018-03-07 Thread Ryan Huff
I miss what "this" is in your context? On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 2:11 PM Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: I wonder how cloud-based phone system like Cisco spark will answer this? https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/karis-law-you-compliant-

Re: [cisco-voip] e911

2018-03-08 Thread Ryan Huff
olloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com<mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>> wrote: Can you not call 911 from Spark? Or did I miss what "this" is in your context? On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 2:11 PM Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: I wonder how

Re: [cisco-voip] SFTP backups stop

2018-04-20 Thread Ryan Huff
Sounds like CUCM isn’t trusting the new cert. Older (but recent) versions CUCM are still using weaker ciphers that OpenSSH and others have deprecated (Ex. CBC-Blowfish). Look at the logs on the SFTP server; I bet you it’s showing a connection attempt from CUCM but saying it can’t agree on a

Re: [cisco-voip] Robo Call DoS

2018-04-16 Thread Ryan Huff
Is it the same CALLED number? While this is service impacting, if the customer can live without the number for a few hours here is what has worked for me ... Take the number and run it to an IVR (Unity Connections or UCCX are common Cisco options). The IVR simply plays the SIT (special

Re: [cisco-voip] Bye Bye Cisco Spark, Hello Webex Teams

2018-04-19 Thread Ryan Huff
fancier, but "Webex Board" probably would've moved more units. From: Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 10:31:53 AM To: Matthew Loraditch Cc: Ben Amick; Lamont, Joshua; cisco-voip voy

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Pre-Upgrade Checklist

2018-04-24 Thread Ryan Huff
It was the 1GB max per transaction file size, but was then fixed. I don’t think they’ve restricted their cipher suites either, so I think it still works with CBC-Blowfish and other older/weaker suites which is why folks like it on CUCM; might not be the most secure but it just works. Sent

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Pre-Upgrade Checklist

2018-04-24 Thread Ryan Huff
, but that doesn’t mean it won’t work any longer. -Ryan On Apr 24, 2018, at 3:10 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: It was the 1GB max per transaction file size, but was then fixed. I don’t think they’ve restricted their cipher suites either, so I t

Re: [cisco-voip] on boarding new employees

2018-04-25 Thread Ryan Huff
BAT Phone templates could save you some time here (if you’re not already using them). If it’s just 1 or 2 users here and there BAT imports will take more time than hand entering them. If it’s a large user on boarding, I’d insert the devices with a CSV against the phone template. -Ryan- > On

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Pre-Upgrade Checklist

2018-04-02 Thread Ryan Huff
These pre upgrade tasks have been the same for awhile I think. Here is the 10.5 guide that shows these. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/upgrade/10_5_1/cucm_b_upgrade-and-migration-guide-105/cucm_b_upgrade-and-migration-guide-105_chapter_01010.html Sent from my iPhone

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM and cube sending weird packets?

2018-03-21 Thread Ryan Huff
vice did not work), or you were hitting a defect. On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:52 PM Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: This comes from empirical experience here but I have most definitely hit odd issues with “Run on all CM nodes” and the originator not being

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM and cube sending weird packets?

2018-03-21 Thread Ryan Huff
isco-v...@gmail.com>> wrote: Typo? If its enabled, then CMG doesn't matter. On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:30 PM Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com<mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Do you have “Run on all nodes” checked on the CUCM trunk? If so, please verify all CM nodes running

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM and cube sending weird packets?

2018-03-21 Thread Ryan Huff
Do you have “Run on all nodes” checked on the CUCM trunk? If so, please verify all CM nodes running the call manager service are in the CM Group specified in the device pool bring used by the CUCM sip trunk. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 21, 2018, at 13:24, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.

Re: [cisco-voip] Fax !!! at my wits end!!!

2018-03-23 Thread Ryan Huff
Based on this (regarding the MTP), and the previous SDP audio header; it’s very clear something is changing the DTMF method (which is why MTP is “fixing” it). Non negotiable DTMF can absolutely cause a call to fail, especially faxing (because the other side effectively won’t “hear” the

Re: [cisco-voip] session target dns

2018-03-06 Thread Ryan Huff
Good morning Ed, Just thought I’d toss this out there to be aware of; CsCuy96398 (DNS query delay). While your 16.3.5 version is not listed as a known affected release, its also not specifically listed

Re: [cisco-voip] PUT Broken Today?

2018-04-26 Thread Ryan Huff
Bruh how much did the US Government spend on healthcare.gov? Remember that s**t show? Like $1T or something stupid like that and it still had scale issues in the beginning. Just goes to show you that money doesn’t fix sloppy programming. Sent from my iPhone On Apr

Re: [cisco-voip] CNAM database update service

2018-09-27 Thread Ryan Huff
In the US, the far end’s carrier is generally responsible for the lookup/dip in the CNAM DB. The calling party’s carrier is generally responsible for the updates. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 27, 2018, at 12:07, Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: Has anyone had any recent

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.5.1SU5 from Pub go to Serviceablity and subscriber error?

2018-10-05 Thread Ryan Huff
Jason, this is usually due to the viewed server not trusting the ipsec cert of the viewing server, but I’d make sure tomcat is legit too because whatever stopped the ipsec cert from transferring probably stopped the others to (Ex. a subscriber was powered off while a new subscriber was added

Re: [cisco-voip] HELP

2018-11-01 Thread Ryan Huff
In general? Or with something specific? Aside from Cisco Voice, I’m a pretty good carpenter and a decent auto mechanic. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 1, 2018, at 09:28, Fry, John mailto:john@illinois.gov>> wrote: help State of Illinois - CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained

Re: [cisco-voip] jabber for mac with ADFS, credentials repeatedly prompt?

2018-10-30 Thread Ryan Huff
Is forced UPN discovery getting picked up I wonder? Not sure if that’s a thing on Mac Jabber ... In Windows, you’d install the client with the following CLI switches: CLEAR=1 UPN_DISCOVERY_ENABLED=false CLICK2X=DISABLE Sent from my iPhone On Oct 30, 2018, at 15:57, Matthew Loraditch

Re: [cisco-voip] connected party information while calling webex

2018-11-02 Thread Ryan Huff
UDS services referenced by FQDN or IP? Sent from my iPhone On Nov 2, 2018, at 13:55, Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: I’ve migrated my development cluster configuration to my production cluster configuration and have compared them as best as possible, but I seem to be

Re: [cisco-voip] WAN Delays > 80ms for CUCM cluster?

2018-11-06 Thread Ryan Huff
You are able to correlate the out-of-band RTT to only when the dbreplication stat command is ran, or are there other times the RTT is OOB that isn't related to querying the replication status? Thanks, -R From: cisco-voip on behalf of Nick Barnett Sent:

Re: [cisco-voip] WAN Delays > 80ms for CUCM cluster?

2018-11-06 Thread Ryan Huff
2018 at 12:42 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: You are able to correlate the out-of-band RTT to only when the dbreplication stat command is ran, or are there other times the RTT is OOB that isn't related to querying the replication status? Thanks, -R __

Re: [cisco-voip] connected party information while calling webex

2018-11-02 Thread Ryan Huff
cs<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.uoguelph.ca%2Fccs=02%7C01%7C%7Cf48450122e37408b53a108d640ef23b6%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636767793166374006=a4EpH0KCC20YVS5XyW5ZrB4e5CimYikE3T0HqB7lr5g%3D=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook From:

Re: [cisco-voip] CCIEv2

2018-09-28 Thread Ryan Huff
Don’t discount dcloud.cisco.com either; not a full featured a la carte lab but is a way to get hands on with some equipment, for free. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 28, 2018, at 18:58, Benjamin Turner mailto:benmtur...@hotmail.com>> wrote: Thanks Anthony, I get you, but

Re: [cisco-voip] CCIEv2

2018-09-28 Thread Ryan Huff
r Windows 10 ____ From: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2018 7:04:35 PM To: Benjamin Turner Cc: Anthony Holloway; Cisco VoIP Group Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCIEv2 Don’t discount dcloud.cisco.com<https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%

Re: [cisco-voip] Roomkit only dials SIP uri from phonebook :(

2018-09-29 Thread Ryan Huff
Wow ... that’s a pretty egregious, “forget”. On Sep 29, 2018, at 12:18, Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: Finally got phonebook working within my roomkit. Turned out, the partner forgot to disable the “8.0” enterprise parameter after our migration and TVS certificate wasn’t

Re: [cisco-voip] Webex Teams Down

2018-09-25 Thread Ryan Huff
k.nether.net>> On Behalf Of Matthew Loraditch Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 9:43 AM To: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>>; Matt Jacobson mailto:m4ttjacob...@gmail.com>> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] We

Re: [cisco-voip] Webex Teams Down

2018-09-25 Thread Ryan Huff
ca%2Fccs=02%7C01%7C%7C2402c8f43c8c4758269808d622fbc66c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636734862088992900=wmNZlQ1OIZdMxkQo%2FZR%2BpvyIG0uGwIJPIUPkyTMzgM4%3D=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook From: cisco-voip mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> On Behal

Re: [cisco-voip] Auto Attendant setup

2018-12-31 Thread Ryan Huff
Are you using SIP (on the dial peer and CUC ports)? If not, I’d use SIP as it tends to work better in my experience. Additionally, make sure the dial peer’s DTMF method supports RTP-NTE (dtmf-relay rtp-nte). Make sure you have codecs in the dial peer matched for whatever you have set in CUC

Re: [cisco-voip] Shenanigans

2019-01-02 Thread Ryan Huff
h Improve Life tagline] On Jan 2, 2019, at 5:21 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Y’all see where JD just landed? This is starting to get interesting.. -Ryan ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:ci

Re: [cisco-voip] Shenanigans

2019-01-02 Thread Ryan Huff
ca%2Fccs=02%7C01%7C%7Cb481047c5b3e41bec34108d671018451%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636820648663287095=8hfoN6P2a6M%2Fj1EiANdzVjZmwzW6mYfes%2FntXHBK73s%3D=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Jan 2, 2019, at 5:21 PM, R

Re: [cisco-voip] PCI DSS compliance for Cisco IPT/UCCX

2019-01-22 Thread Ryan Huff
At a high level I’d think you’ll need to look into SRTP (aka voice encryption) enabled system-wide, no call recording (which you can’t do with SRTP anyway) and possibly no call monitoring too (at least on the PII calls). Then adhere to all the physical access rules for servers that store or

[cisco-voip] Expressway cluster algorithm

2019-01-23 Thread Ryan Huff
Can anyone explain or cite the documents that define the algorithm used to determine which Expressway node in a given cluster is selected to process a call. You can influence the selection with DNS SRV priority and weight, but does not appear to guarantee which cluster node is selected each

Re: [cisco-voip] [EXT] Expressway cluster algorithm

2019-01-23 Thread Ryan Huff
> On Jan 23, 2019, at 15:29, Ryan Huff wrote: > > Thanks for responding! > > “Lowest resource usage” is the most specific info I’ve ever found. Is that > just CPU, or Mem or IOPS or any combo? And which of the “resource” metrics > take priority in the decision? &

Re: [cisco-voip] [EXT] Expressway cluster algorithm

2019-01-23 Thread Ryan Huff
Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 23, 2019, at 15:34, Ryan Huff wrote: > > Or, rather than fixed machine resources, could it be application resource > logic (node with the most recent, least amount of calls.. etc)? > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Jan 23, 2019,

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway cluster algorithm

2019-01-23 Thread Ryan Huff
800270c08d68175ce68%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636838740301717401=ixteprRLq580fRH9n5Vdp56wsISGhi1HDpffXABFEaM%3D=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Jan 23, 2019, at 3:19 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>>

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway cluster algorithm

2019-01-23 Thread Ryan Huff
wrote: Is this for inbound B2B or for MRA? If inbound B2B, it's more up to the caller's implementation of DNS. If the caller is Webex, their may be some documented behavior out there somewhere. On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 4:17 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: I’m trying

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway cluster algorithm

2019-01-23 Thread Ryan Huff
ca%2Fccs=02%7C01%7C%7C40d50e2f043942d852fb08d6817aa3b9%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636838761063159095=MvKoUVer%2B6g0ybMCWVyTM14y7jEm7F%2BxekLAaxh6uxU%3D=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Jan 23, 2019,

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
P Ping and SIP OPTIONS Ping are related, but they are completely different. Just because you cannot ICMP Ping the SIP Peer at L3, doesn't mean you cannot OPTIONs them. Am I understanding your thought process correctly? On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 11:53 AM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
200 voice-class sip bind control source-interface voice-class sip bind media source-interface dtmf-relay rtp-nte sip-notify no vad ! Thanks, Ryan From: Anthony Holloway Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 12:46 PM To: NateCCIE Cc: Ryan Huff; Erik

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
Couldn't you just use voice class sip options/keepalives to mark when the ITSP is down, so CUCM marks the trunk out of service and fails to the next route group member immediately (ideally, your secondary CUBE)? Seems like thats a more natural way of doing it versus using IP SLAs... Thanks, -

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
Thanks, Ryan Huff, CCDP, CCNP Cisco Certified Network and Design Professional From: Ryan Huff Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 12:46 PM To: Erik Anderson Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over Not sure what kind of code you're working with but if its modern

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
Yep, I missed that line ... apologies... Thanks, Ryan From: Anthony Holloway Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 12:37 PM To: Ryan Huff Cc: Erik Anderson; cisco-voip voyp list Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over He did mention that L3 does not support

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
%7C1%7C0%7C636809439553495449=JEd%2BRZotzTeLqrXcEx6rEzCjH1SKJhQkTfLzrS%2BEEPc%3D=0>? Thanks for sharing that tip Ryan! On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 3:52 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: I like ntp master 2 as a fallback, to allow synchronization with the local device clock in a DR/O

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
the local clock remains a fallback, and is only promoted from association to synchronization, if needed. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 20, 2018, at 18:17, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Corrected sentence: “CCM syncs to a local ntp master set at 2 just fine; yields the CCM pub

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
cess correctly? On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 11:53 AM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Thanks, Ryan Huff, CCDP, CCNP Cisco Certified Network and Design Professional From: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Sent: Thursday, December 20,

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
n0wrAj0E6%2Fo6ZrQmWh9slkL%2Bf%2BAnE%3D=0>? Thanks for sharing that tip Ryan! On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 3:52 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: I like ntp master 2 as a fallback, to allow synchronization with the local device clock in a DR/Outage scenario where I fail sync to th

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
Corrected sentence: “CCM syncs to a local ntp master set at 2 just fine; yields the CCM pub at S3 and cluster subs at S4...” Sent from my iPhone On Dec 20, 2018, at 18:12, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: CCM syncs to a local ntp master set at 2 just fine; yields the C

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
I have got to stop sending these damn things from my phone ... "CCM pub happily at S3 and the cluster subs then at an S4. Works great actually." Now you can dump an S1 server right on CCM to get an S2 to CCM, but I'd never recommend doing that for a variety of reasons. Thanks, Ryan

Re: [cisco-voip] Recovering UCOS Passwords - Round 281

2018-12-05 Thread Ryan Huff
Send me the details Pete. I can test. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 5, 2018, at 13:33, Pete Brown mailto:j...@chykn.com>> wrote: I'm sure some of you noticed, but earlier this year Cisco started releasing patches to kill off the last sanctioned method of getting to platformConfig.xml. When you

Re: [cisco-voip] Application Dial Rules equivalent for SIP URI dialing devices?

2018-11-22 Thread Ryan Huff
SIP Route patterns come to mind; you’d have to get creative with RegEx to create more specific matches for the shortened numbers though and it won’t scale well. If you’re looking for true SIP transformation behaviors, you’ll probably need the assistance of a SIP proxy; VCS comes to mind. Send

Re: [cisco-voip] Best Practice or Way to bulk update Caller ID

2018-11-26 Thread Ryan Huff
ty's carrier to perform the appropriate CNAM dip into the ANI ALI database and ultimately present the characters to the called party's device in the appropriate facility / contact header. Thanks, Ryan Huff, CCDP, CCNP Cisco Certified Network and Design Professional

Re: [cisco-voip] Exchange Hybrid - presence gateway

2019-01-08 Thread Ryan Huff
Dose your scenario fit any of the following: A.) The mailbox for the user could not be found because the email address is not correct (spelled wrong.. etc)? B.) The email address is for a distribution group, which is not a true mailbox? C.) The mailbox is configured to use an Exchange Online

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE setup to Centurylink SIP Trunk

2018-09-12 Thread Ryan Huff
nks, Ryan From: NateCCIE Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 9:54 PM To: 'Ryan Huff'; 'Jason Aarons (Americas)'; 'cisco-voip' Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CUBE setup to Centurylink SIP Trunk I don’t see any reason to include the media address in the trusted list. That wou

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE setup to Centurylink SIP Trunk

2018-09-12 Thread Ryan Huff
Target the signaling address in your dial peers, the media address will be advertised in the SDP. Make sure to include both in your IP Trusted List ACL (under the voice service voip configuration) as well as any CUCM signaling nodes that are not directly targeted by a dial-peer (but I typically

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco ATA Devices need reset

2018-09-19 Thread Ryan Huff
Back in they day with the older 186 & 187s, there was this issue where the ATA would lose registration if the second/other port was not configured with a DN. If that is the case, try and configure the other port and see if that improves your experience. It looks like someone has reported a

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway Search Rules - Source:Any -or- Source-Named Zone

2018-09-13 Thread Ryan Huff
Pardon ... “the E’s search rule” ... I said traversal zone. Email needs a delete like WebEx Teams ... Sent from my iPhone On Sep 13, 2018, at 11:53, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: The source for the E’s traversal zone only needs to be ‘ANY’, if it truly needs to be

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway Search Rules - Source:Any -or- Source-Named Zone

2018-09-13 Thread Ryan Huff
The source for the E’s traversal zone only needs to be ‘ANY’, if it truly needs to be. I’ve deployed several scenarios where the business only wanted to receive B2B calls from other things on it’s own domain (or a few domains strung together in Regex). Also, using the Call Policy engine (under

Re: [cisco-voip] A plugin for those using Observium to monitor UC gear..

2019-02-26 Thread Ryan Huff
-sparkdata=02%7C01%7C%7C434180b73dc140f13d2a08d69c6329f4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636868347047202983sdata=7x8kStOxIHPabVZvSY4SjX9o%2F5KaLGkvdC9xeJCK0Fs%3Dreserved=0 > >> On 27/02/19 03:54, Ryan Huff wrote: >> Hey folks, thought I'd share with the community as I recent

[cisco-voip] A plugin for those using Observium to monitor UC gear..

2019-02-26 Thread Ryan Huff
Hey folks, thought I'd share with the community as I recently had a need that build the tool for, and thought others might benefit too. If you use Observium (http://observium.org) as an NMS to monitor UC/Network gear, you may find this to be interesting:

Re: [cisco-voip] Persistent Chat

2019-02-11 Thread Ryan Huff
Erick, Here is a web front end I wrote for the compliance dB. If you’re handy with PHP, you could add a delete / prune function fairly easy. Or perhaps the easier thing in your case, is to just reverse engineer the script and grab the queries and pass those along to your customer’s SQL admin..

Re: [cisco-voip] 12.5(1) dropped

2019-01-25 Thread Ryan Huff
For lab purposes, you can make your own bootable image. That’s what I did for my 12.5 lab that I built. I deployed 11.5, then upgraded to 12.5 to observe any issues that I encountered. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 25, 2019, at 07:33, Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: CCO has

[cisco-voip] One of the silliest bugs ever

2019-04-15 Thread Ryan Huff
This is just crazy... https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvh72242 -Ryan ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] PUT Tool Bootables - what version?

2019-05-15 Thread Ryan Huff
The checksum is written to the OS. I’ve heard tell from the old country of a TAC agent using it as a way out of an otherwise entitled case. If you inject a boot table from a RedHat image into a Redhat image, there isn’t any functional difference. I would not inject a boot table from a RedHat

Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via local PSTN

2019-05-15 Thread Ryan Huff
You’ll need a specific Webex DNS zone and the traversal trunk really just needs to support pre-loaded route headers and SIP parameter preservation (those are the most significant differences over the traversal / neighbor zone you might have setup for B2B). It’s a simple enough configuration,

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >