Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via local PSTN

2019-05-15 Thread Ryan Huff
e: Thursday, 16 May 2019 at 9:30 am To: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Cc: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>" mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via local

Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via local PSTN

2019-05-15 Thread Ryan Huff
s enterprise licensing, so they should be able to do whatever they want... Jonathan On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 6:16 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: You’ll need a specific Webex DNS zone and the traversal trunk really just needs to support pre-loaded route headers and SIP

Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via local PSTN

2019-05-15 Thread Ryan Huff
to make them work. Looks like you’d still need to retain Hybrid Call for cloud registered devices. There was one specific annoyance with the Hybrid Call from the apps, and I can’t find it in my Teams search ☹ Cheers, Tim From: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Date: Thursday, 16 Ma

Re: [cisco-voip] IM Upgrade Steps during CUCM upgrade

2019-05-28 Thread Ryan Huff
Actually, I prefer to disable IMP HA before installing in the inactive PT. This way, if you have to flip back to the other partition for some reason, IMP is already in an “HA disabled” state, which tends to make IMP recover a little better in my experience. Then just enable HA once everything

Re: [cisco-voip] IM Upgrade Steps during CUCM upgrade

2019-05-28 Thread Ryan Huff
This is what I do for an in-place upgrade with no other changes (hostname, IP address.. etc). I do the cucm pub first (obviously), then imp pub (which is more like a cucm sub for upgrade purposes), then all the cucm and imp subs; everything into the inactive pt. I do the pubs individually,

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

2019-05-23 Thread Ryan Huff
rh...@byteworks.com<mailto:rh...@byteworks.com>, if any hard chargers are in the process of setting up a space... Sent from my iPhone On May 23, 2019, at 14:13, Peter Slow mailto:peter.s...@gmail.com>> wrote: I want some Cheetos! I’ll be there! On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

2019-05-23 Thread Ryan Huff
and commentary on what was being learned that week. I might even been in the Engineering Deathmatch again, as a defending champ. I hope to god they don't put me up against you Ryan. Fingers crossed. On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 2:19 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Just

Re: [cisco-voip] Multiple native CI/CH WebEx sites in same control hub org

2019-05-23 Thread Ryan Huff
I do Sent from my iPhone On May 23, 2019, at 19:09, Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: Can anyone confirm they have a control hub org with multiple control hub / common identity managed Webex sites enabled? I’m not talking linked sites. These are WebEx sites that were created

Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via local PSTN

2019-05-16 Thread Ryan Huff
egree. I really need to meditate or something. On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 9:39 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Yup, this stuff is soo fluid right now, it’s a contradictory mess . The on-prem registration, IMHO, is rrr from prime time (as you even noted, “prev

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway E Firewall Rule Activation

2019-04-30 Thread Ryan Huff
w); its easier to troubleshoot, easier to install, easier to support and easier to secure. Though, I suspect I'm, "preaching to the choir", lol . All good my friend. Thanks, Ryan From: Pawlowski, Adam Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 11:36 AM To: 'Ryan Huff

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway E Firewall Rule Activation

2019-04-30 Thread Ryan Huff
though, the NAT reflection could be a limitation of some firewalls. On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:09 AM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Adam, I certainly didn't mean to imply the, "Expressway Edge on a Stick" method doesn't work, though out of pure technical curiosi

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway E Firewall Rule Activation

2019-04-30 Thread Ryan Huff
Look at that, you did say. I just "tl;dr"'ed it hahah -Ryan From: cisco-voip on behalf of Ryan Huff Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 12:08 PM To: Pawlowski, Adam Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway E Firewall Rule

Re: [cisco-voip] [EXT] Re: Expressway E Firewall Rule Activation

2019-04-30 Thread Ryan Huff
not the Cisco recommended deployment model in the documentation. Every Expressway deployment should try to achieve two security contexts on the edge (or isolated networks with ACLs). -Ryan From: Jeffrey McHugh Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 1:29 PM To: Ryan

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway E Firewall Rule Activation

2019-04-30 Thread Ryan Huff
deploy this way, given the considerations. And as always, I like to post and see what I can learn, especially from superstars such as yourself ☺ Best, Adam Pawlowski SUNYAB NCS From: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 12:09 PM To: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...

[cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

2019-04-29 Thread Ryan Huff
Just curious to know whom (if anyone) from the list will be at CLUS this year in San Diego? I will be and would love to meetup with those from the list whom I’ve only exchanged emails with thus far. ___ cisco-voip mailing list

Re: [cisco-voip] External call attempts to Expressway E

2019-04-29 Thread Ryan Huff
[0-9,a-z,A-Z]{0,6}$ * The first 0-6 characters are made up of alphanumerics 0-9 and/or upper/lower case letter and do not exceed the 6th character * Example: 1000 * Example: * Example: NoAuth Thanks, Ryan Huff, CCDP, CCNP Cisco C

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

2019-04-29 Thread Ryan Huff
y hard given the size of venue etc! -jason From: cisco-voip mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> On Behalf Of Anthony Holloway Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 3:38 PM To: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway E Firewall Rule Activation

2019-04-30 Thread Ryan Huff
That seems odd and not been my experience. Let me ask; why are you using the application firewall rather than the actual firewall (another reason all our edge’s should be using dual interfaces with LAN1 and LAN2 in their own separate security zones)? Is there a reason you have to, in other

Re: [cisco-voip] CPU Reservations

2019-07-10 Thread Ryan Huff
People view dial tone as if it were in the US Bill of Rights. Let it not be there when expected and see what happens. It’s a fascinating social experience. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 10, 2019, at 10:47, Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: My answer back to them is this most of

Re: [cisco-voip] CPU Reservations

2019-07-08 Thread Ryan Huff
Adam, You'd probably be less likely to have an "issue" if the host's aggregate compute resources are at least 30%-35% below subscribed capacity (but no guarantees). Real time traffic on the software such as mtp, moh,.. etc (I think UCOS even has some files that internally communicate via real

Re: [cisco-voip] How difficult is hybrid call (connector) setup ?

2019-07-02 Thread Ryan Huff
It’s not that bad (maybe 1 - 2 hours to get a functional test going). The most unexpected thing I think you may run into is the use/need for MTLS (TCP:5062) between the Edge and Control Hub. Also, your Expressway version should be 12.5.x (I think 8.11.4 may still work but you’ll get an alarm

Re: [cisco-voip] How difficult is hybrid call (connector) setup ?

2019-07-02 Thread Ryan Huff
on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Jul 2, 2019, at 9:49 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: It’s not that bad (maybe 1 - 2 hours to get a functional test going). The most unexpected thing I think you may run i

Re: [cisco-voip] Uplinx Report Tool?

2019-08-02 Thread Ryan Huff
I use them all the time. As long as you invest the time to creating good CSS and templates, it’s great. The default templates are generic and just create “data dumps” in Word format... IMO. However, and this is my one diva moment here, the GUI wind will not maximize, lol... they jail it for a

Re: [cisco-voip] Uplinx Report Tool?

2019-08-03 Thread Ryan Huff
and, you can maximize the application window.. *key selling point* lol. Seriously though, both are really good products. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 3, 2019, at 06:51, Stephen Welsh mailto:stephen.we...@unifiedfx.com>> wrote: Hi Nick, hope you are well. Yes I do follow this email group

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SU release cycle

2019-08-15 Thread Ryan Huff
After 12.5, no more “.5” releases, it’ll just be major versions (and the SUs in between). After 12.5 we skip 13 and go right to 14 (then presumably, 15 after that). Sent from my iPhone On Aug 15, 2019, at 02:05, Anthony Holloway wrote:  What's going on with .5 releases? I don't think I

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SU release cycle

2019-08-15 Thread Ryan Huff
h software revisionist trends .. etc. -Ryan From: Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 10:31 AM To: Matthew Loraditch ; Anthony Holloway ; Ryan Huff Cc: Charles Goldsmith ; cisco-voip voyp list Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CUCM SU release cycle Yeah, this wa

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SU release cycle

2019-08-15 Thread Ryan Huff
ence to this announcement? I didn't see it in the cisco live preso linked earlier. If not, what's the reported reason for dropping minor release numbers? On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 5:40 AM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: After 12.5, no more “.5” releases, it’ll just be major ve

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity DRS components

2019-08-13 Thread Ryan Huff
In Unity, the Primary and HA DRS components are separated and operate independently. Though it’s generally not necessary to backup the HA node. - In a DR recovery scenario of both Unity Servers, you can restore the Primary and install a new HA. - In a DR recovery scenario of the HA only, just

Re: [cisco-voip] CIMC MIC self-signed cert and new browsers

2019-08-29 Thread Ryan Huff
May want to look at the browser’s address bar and see if there is an applet / plugin looking for permission to run. - R On Aug 29, 2019, at 01:56, Dana Tong wrote:  Hi all, New server install. Trying to login to the CIMC to configure. Chrome, Firefox, IE all have a hissy fit. I did manage

Re: [cisco-voip] TAC Support for Unsupported Configurations

2019-09-10 Thread Ryan Huff
Wow, this one hits home.. I’ve found (and this is just my experience, which is entirely subjective) that, if in a dire moment of need, on a Saturday morning at 12:12 AM EST, if you show a humanness to yourself, TAC will show moments of kindness ... supporting the statement that yes indeed, it

Re: [cisco-voip] Do you need TMS to get OBTP

2019-08-07 Thread Ryan Huff
To do OBTP on prem; TMS/TMS-XE. If you want to go the cloud registration route for the endpoint, Expressway-C/management connector and Hybrid calendar connector (on-prem Exchange) or cloud (Webex) calendar (O365 or Google) Sent from my iPhone On Aug 7, 2019, at 12:39, Jonathan Charles

Re: [cisco-voip] Configure Vg224 fxs as fxo

2019-07-15 Thread Ryan Huff
There are hardware differences between an fxs and fxo port Sent from my iPhone On Jul 15, 2019, at 18:20, Fares Alsaafani mailto:fares@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi guys, I would like to ask if it possible configuring vg224 ports fxs as fxo to support overhead paging that is connect via Bogan

Re: [cisco-voip] IP Phone 8811 backgrounds

2019-09-23 Thread Ryan Huff
I find that on-prem CUCM is still used fairly substantially.. :). The thumbnail needs to be PNG and 139x109 (not 159x109). I’d also double check the spelling and casing of the directory in TFTP; Desktops/800x400 Your images must be in PNG format and the dimensions of the full sized image must

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Domain substitution

2019-10-04 Thread Ryan Huff
5238c9d08d749390724%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637058381594062845=NZ1r%2BfF%2FekCgt%2FARyjJ3rxBVHLHQXVdDERhMIM4sISE%3D=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Oct 4, 2019, at 9:05 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outl

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Domain substitution

2019-10-04 Thread Ryan Huff
a%7C1%7C0%7C637058400631419029=Bm%2FOh%2Fp3TDYkOYis27I47D3rrDAJDEp4doaBw5lr9XA%3D=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Oct 4, 2019, at 10:32 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote:

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Domain substitution

2019-10-04 Thread Ryan Huff
According to RFC 2782 (https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2782.txt), it does not, under the “Target Definition”; “there must be one or more address records for this name, the name must not be an alias”. However, I can tell you that I have used a CNAME in the SRV target field before, and it appeared

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Domain substitution

2019-10-05 Thread Ryan Huff
niversity of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Oct 4, 2019, at 10:32 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Webex Hybrid Calling (with Expressway B2B), could in theory, help accomplish this. The codec is still cloud registered, though Hybrid calling would al

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Domain substitution

2019-10-04 Thread Ryan Huff
stagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Oct 4, 2019, at 7:46 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: According to RFC 2782 (https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2782.txt<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Domain substitution

2019-10-04 Thread Ryan Huff
iPhone On Oct 4, 2019, at 22:57, NateCCIE wrote:  Doesn’t cucm have the ability to look at the user portion of the URI only? For like when you’re routing to a DN? Or I think you can add the short domain to the list of the CUCM “owned” domains in enterprise parameters. From: Ryan Huff Sent

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Domain substitution

2019-10-04 Thread Ryan Huff
to the list of the CUCM “owned” domains in enterprise parameters. From: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Sent: Friday, October 4, 2019 8:51 PM To: NateCCIE mailto:natec...@gmail.com>> Cc: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>; cisco-voip voyp list mailto:cisco-voip@puck.ne

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX not working after change to SIP

2019-10-13 Thread Ryan Huff
Sort of sounds like you may have a Class of Service (CSS/Partition) issue with the SIP trunk between CUBE and CUCM, since that is most likely the most significant configuration change/add since moving to SIP, that could generate 404 responses. Could also be an issue with the device pool on the

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX not working after change to SIP

2019-10-13 Thread Ryan Huff
*** Regional issues would NOT cause a 404 response generally. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 13, 2019, at 22:15, Ryan Huff wrote:  Sort of sounds like you may have a Class of Service (CSS/Partition) issue with the SIP trunk between CUBE and CUCM, since that is most likely the most significant

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX not working after change to SIP

2019-10-13 Thread Ryan Huff
a few logs to see what its doing with uccx in the mix. On Oct 13, 2019, at 8:15 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Sort of sounds like you may have a Class of Service (CSS/Partition) issue with the SIP trunk between CUBE and CUCM, since that is most likely the most signi

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway cluster certificates.

2019-10-14 Thread Ryan Huff
Are the expressway-C server using self-signed certificates (I doubt it because you said they are multi-san)? Generally, CUCM doesn’t need to trust the identity certificate (unless it is self signed). In all other cases, CUCM needs to trust the certificate authority the signed the expressway-c

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway cluster certificates.

2019-10-14 Thread Ryan Huff
, Ariel. De: Ryan Huff Enviado el: lunes, 14 de octubre de 2019 18:14 Para: ROZA, Ariel CC: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Asunto: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway cluster certificates. Are the expressway-C server using self-signed certificates (I doubt it because you said they are multi-san

<    3   4   5   6   7   8