Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway cluster certificates.

2019-10-14 Thread Ryan Huff
, Ariel. De: Ryan Huff Enviado el: lunes, 14 de octubre de 2019 18:14 Para: ROZA, Ariel CC: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Asunto: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway cluster certificates. Are the expressway-C server using self-signed certificates (I doubt it because you said they are multi-san

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway cluster certificates.

2019-10-14 Thread Ryan Huff
Are the expressway-C server using self-signed certificates (I doubt it because you said they are multi-san)? Generally, CUCM doesn’t need to trust the identity certificate (unless it is self signed). In all other cases, CUCM needs to trust the certificate authority the signed the expressway-c

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX not working after change to SIP

2019-10-13 Thread Ryan Huff
a few logs to see what its doing with uccx in the mix. On Oct 13, 2019, at 8:15 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Sort of sounds like you may have a Class of Service (CSS/Partition) issue with the SIP trunk between CUBE and CUCM, since that is most likely the most signi

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX not working after change to SIP

2019-10-13 Thread Ryan Huff
*** Regional issues would NOT cause a 404 response generally. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 13, 2019, at 22:15, Ryan Huff wrote:  Sort of sounds like you may have a Class of Service (CSS/Partition) issue with the SIP trunk between CUBE and CUCM, since that is most likely the most significant

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX not working after change to SIP

2019-10-13 Thread Ryan Huff
Sort of sounds like you may have a Class of Service (CSS/Partition) issue with the SIP trunk between CUBE and CUCM, since that is most likely the most significant configuration change/add since moving to SIP, that could generate 404 responses. Could also be an issue with the device pool on the

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Domain substitution

2019-10-05 Thread Ryan Huff
niversity of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Oct 4, 2019, at 10:32 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Webex Hybrid Calling (with Expressway B2B), could in theory, help accomplish this. The codec is still cloud registered, though Hybrid calling would al

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Domain substitution

2019-10-04 Thread Ryan Huff
to the list of the CUCM “owned” domains in enterprise parameters. From: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Sent: Friday, October 4, 2019 8:51 PM To: NateCCIE mailto:natec...@gmail.com>> Cc: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>; cisco-voip voyp list mailto:cisco-voip@puck.ne

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Domain substitution

2019-10-04 Thread Ryan Huff
iPhone On Oct 4, 2019, at 22:57, NateCCIE wrote:  Doesn’t cucm have the ability to look at the user portion of the URI only? For like when you’re routing to a DN? Or I think you can add the short domain to the list of the CUCM “owned” domains in enterprise parameters. From: Ryan Huff Sent

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Domain substitution

2019-10-04 Thread Ryan Huff
a%7C1%7C0%7C637058400631419029=Bm%2FOh%2Fp3TDYkOYis27I47D3rrDAJDEp4doaBw5lr9XA%3D=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Oct 4, 2019, at 10:32 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote:

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Domain substitution

2019-10-04 Thread Ryan Huff
5238c9d08d749390724%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637058381594062845=NZ1r%2BfF%2FekCgt%2FARyjJ3rxBVHLHQXVdDERhMIM4sISE%3D=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Oct 4, 2019, at 9:05 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outl

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Domain substitution

2019-10-04 Thread Ryan Huff
stagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Oct 4, 2019, at 7:46 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: According to RFC 2782 (https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2782.txt<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Domain substitution

2019-10-04 Thread Ryan Huff
According to RFC 2782 (https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2782.txt), it does not, under the “Target Definition”; “there must be one or more address records for this name, the name must not be an alias”. However, I can tell you that I have used a CNAME in the SRV target field before, and it appeared

Re: [cisco-voip] IP Phone 8811 backgrounds

2019-09-23 Thread Ryan Huff
I find that on-prem CUCM is still used fairly substantially.. :). The thumbnail needs to be PNG and 139x109 (not 159x109). I’d also double check the spelling and casing of the directory in TFTP; Desktops/800x400 Your images must be in PNG format and the dimensions of the full sized image must

Re: [cisco-voip] TAC Support for Unsupported Configurations

2019-09-10 Thread Ryan Huff
Wow, this one hits home.. I’ve found (and this is just my experience, which is entirely subjective) that, if in a dire moment of need, on a Saturday morning at 12:12 AM EST, if you show a humanness to yourself, TAC will show moments of kindness ... supporting the statement that yes indeed, it

Re: [cisco-voip] CIMC MIC self-signed cert and new browsers

2019-08-29 Thread Ryan Huff
May want to look at the browser’s address bar and see if there is an applet / plugin looking for permission to run. - R On Aug 29, 2019, at 01:56, Dana Tong wrote:  Hi all, New server install. Trying to login to the CIMC to configure. Chrome, Firefox, IE all have a hissy fit. I did manage

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SU release cycle

2019-08-15 Thread Ryan Huff
ence to this announcement? I didn't see it in the cisco live preso linked earlier. If not, what's the reported reason for dropping minor release numbers? On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 5:40 AM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: After 12.5, no more “.5” releases, it’ll just be major ve

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SU release cycle

2019-08-15 Thread Ryan Huff
h software revisionist trends .. etc. -Ryan From: Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 10:31 AM To: Matthew Loraditch ; Anthony Holloway ; Ryan Huff Cc: Charles Goldsmith ; cisco-voip voyp list Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CUCM SU release cycle Yeah, this wa

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM SU release cycle

2019-08-15 Thread Ryan Huff
After 12.5, no more “.5” releases, it’ll just be major versions (and the SUs in between). After 12.5 we skip 13 and go right to 14 (then presumably, 15 after that). Sent from my iPhone On Aug 15, 2019, at 02:05, Anthony Holloway wrote:  What's going on with .5 releases? I don't think I

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity DRS components

2019-08-13 Thread Ryan Huff
In Unity, the Primary and HA DRS components are separated and operate independently. Though it’s generally not necessary to backup the HA node. - In a DR recovery scenario of both Unity Servers, you can restore the Primary and install a new HA. - In a DR recovery scenario of the HA only, just

Re: [cisco-voip] Do you need TMS to get OBTP

2019-08-07 Thread Ryan Huff
To do OBTP on prem; TMS/TMS-XE. If you want to go the cloud registration route for the endpoint, Expressway-C/management connector and Hybrid calendar connector (on-prem Exchange) or cloud (Webex) calendar (O365 or Google) Sent from my iPhone On Aug 7, 2019, at 12:39, Jonathan Charles

Re: [cisco-voip] Uplinx Report Tool?

2019-08-03 Thread Ryan Huff
and, you can maximize the application window.. *key selling point* lol. Seriously though, both are really good products. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 3, 2019, at 06:51, Stephen Welsh mailto:stephen.we...@unifiedfx.com>> wrote: Hi Nick, hope you are well. Yes I do follow this email group

Re: [cisco-voip] Uplinx Report Tool?

2019-08-02 Thread Ryan Huff
I use them all the time. As long as you invest the time to creating good CSS and templates, it’s great. The default templates are generic and just create “data dumps” in Word format... IMO. However, and this is my one diva moment here, the GUI wind will not maximize, lol... they jail it for a

Re: [cisco-voip] Configure Vg224 fxs as fxo

2019-07-15 Thread Ryan Huff
There are hardware differences between an fxs and fxo port Sent from my iPhone On Jul 15, 2019, at 18:20, Fares Alsaafani mailto:fares@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi guys, I would like to ask if it possible configuring vg224 ports fxs as fxo to support overhead paging that is connect via Bogan

Re: [cisco-voip] CPU Reservations

2019-07-10 Thread Ryan Huff
People view dial tone as if it were in the US Bill of Rights. Let it not be there when expected and see what happens. It’s a fascinating social experience. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 10, 2019, at 10:47, Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: My answer back to them is this most of

Re: [cisco-voip] CPU Reservations

2019-07-08 Thread Ryan Huff
Adam, You'd probably be less likely to have an "issue" if the host's aggregate compute resources are at least 30%-35% below subscribed capacity (but no guarantees). Real time traffic on the software such as mtp, moh,.. etc (I think UCOS even has some files that internally communicate via real

Re: [cisco-voip] How difficult is hybrid call (connector) setup ?

2019-07-02 Thread Ryan Huff
on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Jul 2, 2019, at 9:49 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: It’s not that bad (maybe 1 - 2 hours to get a functional test going). The most unexpected thing I think you may run i

Re: [cisco-voip] How difficult is hybrid call (connector) setup ?

2019-07-02 Thread Ryan Huff
It’s not that bad (maybe 1 - 2 hours to get a functional test going). The most unexpected thing I think you may run into is the use/need for MTLS (TCP:5062) between the Edge and Control Hub. Also, your Expressway version should be 12.5.x (I think 8.11.4 may still work but you’ll get an alarm

Re: [cisco-voip] IM Upgrade Steps during CUCM upgrade

2019-05-28 Thread Ryan Huff
Actually, I prefer to disable IMP HA before installing in the inactive PT. This way, if you have to flip back to the other partition for some reason, IMP is already in an “HA disabled” state, which tends to make IMP recover a little better in my experience. Then just enable HA once everything

Re: [cisco-voip] IM Upgrade Steps during CUCM upgrade

2019-05-28 Thread Ryan Huff
This is what I do for an in-place upgrade with no other changes (hostname, IP address.. etc). I do the cucm pub first (obviously), then imp pub (which is more like a cucm sub for upgrade purposes), then all the cucm and imp subs; everything into the inactive pt. I do the pubs individually,

Re: [cisco-voip] Multiple native CI/CH WebEx sites in same control hub org

2019-05-23 Thread Ryan Huff
I do Sent from my iPhone On May 23, 2019, at 19:09, Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: Can anyone confirm they have a control hub org with multiple control hub / common identity managed Webex sites enabled? I’m not talking linked sites. These are WebEx sites that were created

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

2019-05-23 Thread Ryan Huff
rh...@byteworks.com<mailto:rh...@byteworks.com>, if any hard chargers are in the process of setting up a space... Sent from my iPhone On May 23, 2019, at 14:13, Peter Slow mailto:peter.s...@gmail.com>> wrote: I want some Cheetos! I’ll be there! On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

2019-05-23 Thread Ryan Huff
and commentary on what was being learned that week. I might even been in the Engineering Deathmatch again, as a defending champ. I hope to god they don't put me up against you Ryan. Fingers crossed. On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 2:19 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Just

Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via local PSTN

2019-05-16 Thread Ryan Huff
egree. I really need to meditate or something. On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 9:39 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Yup, this stuff is soo fluid right now, it’s a contradictory mess . The on-prem registration, IMHO, is rrr from prime time (as you even noted, “prev

Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via local PSTN

2019-05-15 Thread Ryan Huff
to make them work. Looks like you’d still need to retain Hybrid Call for cloud registered devices. There was one specific annoyance with the Hybrid Call from the apps, and I can’t find it in my Teams search ☹ Cheers, Tim From: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Date: Thursday, 16 Ma

Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via local PSTN

2019-05-15 Thread Ryan Huff
e: Thursday, 16 May 2019 at 9:30 am To: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Cc: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>" mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via local

Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via local PSTN

2019-05-15 Thread Ryan Huff
s enterprise licensing, so they should be able to do whatever they want... Jonathan On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 6:16 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: You’ll need a specific Webex DNS zone and the traversal trunk really just needs to support pre-loaded route headers and SIP

Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via local PSTN

2019-05-15 Thread Ryan Huff
You’ll need a specific Webex DNS zone and the traversal trunk really just needs to support pre-loaded route headers and SIP parameter preservation (those are the most significant differences over the traversal / neighbor zone you might have setup for B2B). It’s a simple enough configuration,

Re: [cisco-voip] PUT Tool Bootables - what version?

2019-05-15 Thread Ryan Huff
The checksum is written to the OS. I’ve heard tell from the old country of a TAC agent using it as a way out of an otherwise entitled case. If you inject a boot table from a RedHat image into a Redhat image, there isn’t any functional difference. I would not inject a boot table from a RedHat

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway E Firewall Rule Activation

2019-04-30 Thread Ryan Huff
deploy this way, given the considerations. And as always, I like to post and see what I can learn, especially from superstars such as yourself ☺ Best, Adam Pawlowski SUNYAB NCS From: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 12:09 PM To: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...

Re: [cisco-voip] [EXT] Re: Expressway E Firewall Rule Activation

2019-04-30 Thread Ryan Huff
not the Cisco recommended deployment model in the documentation. Every Expressway deployment should try to achieve two security contexts on the edge (or isolated networks with ACLs). -Ryan From: Jeffrey McHugh Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 1:29 PM To: Ryan

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway E Firewall Rule Activation

2019-04-30 Thread Ryan Huff
though, the NAT reflection could be a limitation of some firewalls. On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:09 AM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Adam, I certainly didn't mean to imply the, "Expressway Edge on a Stick" method doesn't work, though out of pure technical curiosi

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway E Firewall Rule Activation

2019-04-30 Thread Ryan Huff
Look at that, you did say. I just "tl;dr"'ed it hahah -Ryan From: cisco-voip on behalf of Ryan Huff Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 12:08 PM To: Pawlowski, Adam Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway E Firewall Rule

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway E Firewall Rule Activation

2019-04-30 Thread Ryan Huff
w); its easier to troubleshoot, easier to install, easier to support and easier to secure. Though, I suspect I'm, "preaching to the choir", lol . All good my friend. Thanks, Ryan From: Pawlowski, Adam Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 11:36 AM To: 'Ryan Huff

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway E Firewall Rule Activation

2019-04-30 Thread Ryan Huff
That seems odd and not been my experience. Let me ask; why are you using the application firewall rather than the actual firewall (another reason all our edge’s should be using dual interfaces with LAN1 and LAN2 in their own separate security zones)? Is there a reason you have to, in other

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

2019-04-29 Thread Ryan Huff
y hard given the size of venue etc! -jason From: cisco-voip mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> On Behalf Of Anthony Holloway Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 3:38 PM To: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

[cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

2019-04-29 Thread Ryan Huff
Just curious to know whom (if anyone) from the list will be at CLUS this year in San Diego? I will be and would love to meetup with those from the list whom I’ve only exchanged emails with thus far. ___ cisco-voip mailing list

Re: [cisco-voip] External call attempts to Expressway E

2019-04-29 Thread Ryan Huff
[0-9,a-z,A-Z]{0,6}$ * The first 0-6 characters are made up of alphanumerics 0-9 and/or upper/lower case letter and do not exceed the 6th character * Example: 1000 * Example: * Example: NoAuth Thanks, Ryan Huff, CCDP, CCNP Cisco C

[cisco-voip] One of the silliest bugs ever

2019-04-15 Thread Ryan Huff
This is just crazy... https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvh72242 -Ryan ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] A plugin for those using Observium to monitor UC gear..

2019-02-26 Thread Ryan Huff
-sparkdata=02%7C01%7C%7C434180b73dc140f13d2a08d69c6329f4%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636868347047202983sdata=7x8kStOxIHPabVZvSY4SjX9o%2F5KaLGkvdC9xeJCK0Fs%3Dreserved=0 > >> On 27/02/19 03:54, Ryan Huff wrote: >> Hey folks, thought I'd share with the community as I recent

[cisco-voip] A plugin for those using Observium to monitor UC gear..

2019-02-26 Thread Ryan Huff
Hey folks, thought I'd share with the community as I recently had a need that build the tool for, and thought others might benefit too. If you use Observium (http://observium.org) as an NMS to monitor UC/Network gear, you may find this to be interesting:

Re: [cisco-voip] Persistent Chat

2019-02-11 Thread Ryan Huff
Erick, Here is a web front end I wrote for the compliance dB. If you’re handy with PHP, you could add a delete / prune function fairly easy. Or perhaps the easier thing in your case, is to just reverse engineer the script and grab the queries and pass those along to your customer’s SQL admin..

Re: [cisco-voip] 12.5(1) dropped

2019-01-25 Thread Ryan Huff
For lab purposes, you can make your own bootable image. That’s what I did for my 12.5 lab that I built. I deployed 11.5, then upgraded to 12.5 to observe any issues that I encountered. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 25, 2019, at 07:33, Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: CCO has

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway cluster algorithm

2019-01-23 Thread Ryan Huff
ca%2Fccs=02%7C01%7C%7C40d50e2f043942d852fb08d6817aa3b9%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636838761063159095=MvKoUVer%2B6g0ybMCWVyTM14y7jEm7F%2BxekLAaxh6uxU%3D=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Jan 23, 2019,

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway cluster algorithm

2019-01-23 Thread Ryan Huff
wrote: Is this for inbound B2B or for MRA? If inbound B2B, it's more up to the caller's implementation of DNS. If the caller is Webex, their may be some documented behavior out there somewhere. On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 4:17 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: I’m trying

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway cluster algorithm

2019-01-23 Thread Ryan Huff
800270c08d68175ce68%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636838740301717401=ixteprRLq580fRH9n5Vdp56wsISGhi1HDpffXABFEaM%3D=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Jan 23, 2019, at 3:19 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>>

Re: [cisco-voip] [EXT] Expressway cluster algorithm

2019-01-23 Thread Ryan Huff
Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 23, 2019, at 15:34, Ryan Huff wrote: > > Or, rather than fixed machine resources, could it be application resource > logic (node with the most recent, least amount of calls.. etc)? > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Jan 23, 2019,

Re: [cisco-voip] [EXT] Expressway cluster algorithm

2019-01-23 Thread Ryan Huff
> On Jan 23, 2019, at 15:29, Ryan Huff wrote: > > Thanks for responding! > > “Lowest resource usage” is the most specific info I’ve ever found. Is that > just CPU, or Mem or IOPS or any combo? And which of the “resource” metrics > take priority in the decision? &

[cisco-voip] Expressway cluster algorithm

2019-01-23 Thread Ryan Huff
Can anyone explain or cite the documents that define the algorithm used to determine which Expressway node in a given cluster is selected to process a call. You can influence the selection with DNS SRV priority and weight, but does not appear to guarantee which cluster node is selected each

Re: [cisco-voip] PCI DSS compliance for Cisco IPT/UCCX

2019-01-22 Thread Ryan Huff
At a high level I’d think you’ll need to look into SRTP (aka voice encryption) enabled system-wide, no call recording (which you can’t do with SRTP anyway) and possibly no call monitoring too (at least on the PII calls). Then adhere to all the physical access rules for servers that store or

Re: [cisco-voip] Exchange Hybrid - presence gateway

2019-01-08 Thread Ryan Huff
Dose your scenario fit any of the following: A.) The mailbox for the user could not be found because the email address is not correct (spelled wrong.. etc)? B.) The email address is for a distribution group, which is not a true mailbox? C.) The mailbox is configured to use an Exchange Online

Re: [cisco-voip] Shenanigans

2019-01-02 Thread Ryan Huff
ca%2Fccs=02%7C01%7C%7Cb481047c5b3e41bec34108d671018451%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636820648663287095=8hfoN6P2a6M%2Fj1EiANdzVjZmwzW6mYfes%2FntXHBK73s%3D=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Jan 2, 2019, at 5:21 PM, R

Re: [cisco-voip] Shenanigans

2019-01-02 Thread Ryan Huff
h Improve Life tagline] On Jan 2, 2019, at 5:21 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Y’all see where JD just landed? This is starting to get interesting.. -Ryan ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:ci

Re: [cisco-voip] Auto Attendant setup

2018-12-31 Thread Ryan Huff
Are you using SIP (on the dial peer and CUC ports)? If not, I’d use SIP as it tends to work better in my experience. Additionally, make sure the dial peer’s DTMF method supports RTP-NTE (dtmf-relay rtp-nte). Make sure you have codecs in the dial peer matched for whatever you have set in CUC

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
I have got to stop sending these damn things from my phone ... "CCM pub happily at S3 and the cluster subs then at an S4. Works great actually." Now you can dump an S1 server right on CCM to get an S2 to CCM, but I'd never recommend doing that for a variety of reasons. Thanks, Ryan

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
the local clock remains a fallback, and is only promoted from association to synchronization, if needed. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 20, 2018, at 18:17, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Corrected sentence: “CCM syncs to a local ntp master set at 2 just fine; yields the CCM pub

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
Corrected sentence: “CCM syncs to a local ntp master set at 2 just fine; yields the CCM pub at S3 and cluster subs at S4...” Sent from my iPhone On Dec 20, 2018, at 18:12, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: CCM syncs to a local ntp master set at 2 just fine; yields the C

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
%7C1%7C0%7C636809439553495449=JEd%2BRZotzTeLqrXcEx6rEzCjH1SKJhQkTfLzrS%2BEEPc%3D=0>? Thanks for sharing that tip Ryan! On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 3:52 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: I like ntp master 2 as a fallback, to allow synchronization with the local device clock in a DR/O

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
n0wrAj0E6%2Fo6ZrQmWh9slkL%2Bf%2BAnE%3D=0>? Thanks for sharing that tip Ryan! On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 3:52 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: I like ntp master 2 as a fallback, to allow synchronization with the local device clock in a DR/Outage scenario where I fail sync to th

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
cess correctly? On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 11:53 AM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Thanks, Ryan Huff, CCDP, CCNP Cisco Certified Network and Design Professional From: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Sent: Thursday, December 20,

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
P Ping and SIP OPTIONS Ping are related, but they are completely different. Just because you cannot ICMP Ping the SIP Peer at L3, doesn't mean you cannot OPTIONs them. Am I understanding your thought process correctly? On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 11:53 AM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
200 voice-class sip bind control source-interface voice-class sip bind media source-interface dtmf-relay rtp-nte sip-notify no vad ! Thanks, Ryan From: Anthony Holloway Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 12:46 PM To: NateCCIE Cc: Ryan Huff; Erik

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
Yep, I missed that line ... apologies... Thanks, Ryan From: Anthony Holloway Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 12:37 PM To: Ryan Huff Cc: Erik Anderson; cisco-voip voyp list Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over He did mention that L3 does not support

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
Thanks, Ryan Huff, CCDP, CCNP Cisco Certified Network and Design Professional From: Ryan Huff Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 12:46 PM To: Erik Anderson Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over Not sure what kind of code you're working with but if its modern

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Fail over

2018-12-20 Thread Ryan Huff
Couldn't you just use voice class sip options/keepalives to mark when the ITSP is down, so CUCM marks the trunk out of service and fails to the next route group member immediately (ideally, your secondary CUBE)? Seems like thats a more natural way of doing it versus using IP SLAs... Thanks, -

Re: [cisco-voip] Recovering UCOS Passwords - Round 281

2018-12-05 Thread Ryan Huff
Send me the details Pete. I can test. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 5, 2018, at 13:33, Pete Brown mailto:j...@chykn.com>> wrote: I'm sure some of you noticed, but earlier this year Cisco started releasing patches to kill off the last sanctioned method of getting to platformConfig.xml. When you

Re: [cisco-voip] Best Practice or Way to bulk update Caller ID

2018-11-26 Thread Ryan Huff
ty's carrier to perform the appropriate CNAM dip into the ANI ALI database and ultimately present the characters to the called party's device in the appropriate facility / contact header. Thanks, Ryan Huff, CCDP, CCNP Cisco Certified Network and Design Professional

Re: [cisco-voip] Application Dial Rules equivalent for SIP URI dialing devices?

2018-11-22 Thread Ryan Huff
SIP Route patterns come to mind; you’d have to get creative with RegEx to create more specific matches for the shortened numbers though and it won’t scale well. If you’re looking for true SIP transformation behaviors, you’ll probably need the assistance of a SIP proxy; VCS comes to mind. Send

Re: [cisco-voip] WAN Delays > 80ms for CUCM cluster?

2018-11-06 Thread Ryan Huff
2018 at 12:42 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: You are able to correlate the out-of-band RTT to only when the dbreplication stat command is ran, or are there other times the RTT is OOB that isn't related to querying the replication status? Thanks, -R __

Re: [cisco-voip] WAN Delays > 80ms for CUCM cluster?

2018-11-06 Thread Ryan Huff
You are able to correlate the out-of-band RTT to only when the dbreplication stat command is ran, or are there other times the RTT is OOB that isn't related to querying the replication status? Thanks, -R From: cisco-voip on behalf of Nick Barnett Sent:

Re: [cisco-voip] connected party information while calling webex

2018-11-02 Thread Ryan Huff
cs<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.uoguelph.ca%2Fccs=02%7C01%7C%7Cf48450122e37408b53a108d640ef23b6%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636767793166374006=a4EpH0KCC20YVS5XyW5ZrB4e5CimYikE3T0HqB7lr5g%3D=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook From:

Re: [cisco-voip] connected party information while calling webex

2018-11-02 Thread Ryan Huff
UDS services referenced by FQDN or IP? Sent from my iPhone On Nov 2, 2018, at 13:55, Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: I’ve migrated my development cluster configuration to my production cluster configuration and have compared them as best as possible, but I seem to be

Re: [cisco-voip] HELP

2018-11-01 Thread Ryan Huff
In general? Or with something specific? Aside from Cisco Voice, I’m a pretty good carpenter and a decent auto mechanic. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 1, 2018, at 09:28, Fry, John mailto:john@illinois.gov>> wrote: help State of Illinois - CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained

Re: [cisco-voip] jabber for mac with ADFS, credentials repeatedly prompt?

2018-10-30 Thread Ryan Huff
Is forced UPN discovery getting picked up I wonder? Not sure if that’s a thing on Mac Jabber ... In Windows, you’d install the client with the following CLI switches: CLEAR=1 UPN_DISCOVERY_ENABLED=false CLICK2X=DISABLE Sent from my iPhone On Oct 30, 2018, at 15:57, Matthew Loraditch

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.5.1SU5 from Pub go to Serviceablity and subscriber error?

2018-10-05 Thread Ryan Huff
Jason, this is usually due to the viewed server not trusting the ipsec cert of the viewing server, but I’d make sure tomcat is legit too because whatever stopped the ipsec cert from transferring probably stopped the others to (Ex. a subscriber was powered off while a new subscriber was added

Re: [cisco-voip] Roomkit only dials SIP uri from phonebook :(

2018-09-29 Thread Ryan Huff
Wow ... that’s a pretty egregious, “forget”. On Sep 29, 2018, at 12:18, Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: Finally got phonebook working within my roomkit. Turned out, the partner forgot to disable the “8.0” enterprise parameter after our migration and TVS certificate wasn’t

Re: [cisco-voip] CCIEv2

2018-09-28 Thread Ryan Huff
r Windows 10 ____ From: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2018 7:04:35 PM To: Benjamin Turner Cc: Anthony Holloway; Cisco VoIP Group Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCIEv2 Don’t discount dcloud.cisco.com<https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%

Re: [cisco-voip] CCIEv2

2018-09-28 Thread Ryan Huff
Don’t discount dcloud.cisco.com either; not a full featured a la carte lab but is a way to get hands on with some equipment, for free. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 28, 2018, at 18:58, Benjamin Turner mailto:benmtur...@hotmail.com>> wrote: Thanks Anthony, I get you, but

Re: [cisco-voip] CNAM database update service

2018-09-27 Thread Ryan Huff
In the US, the far end’s carrier is generally responsible for the lookup/dip in the CNAM DB. The calling party’s carrier is generally responsible for the updates. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 27, 2018, at 12:07, Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: Has anyone had any recent

Re: [cisco-voip] Webex Teams Down

2018-09-25 Thread Ryan Huff
ca%2Fccs=02%7C01%7C%7C2402c8f43c8c4758269808d622fbc66c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636734862088992900=wmNZlQ1OIZdMxkQo%2FZR%2BpvyIG0uGwIJPIUPkyTMzgM4%3D=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook From: cisco-voip mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> On Behal

Re: [cisco-voip] Webex Teams Down

2018-09-25 Thread Ryan Huff
k.nether.net>> On Behalf Of Matthew Loraditch Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 9:43 AM To: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>>; Matt Jacobson mailto:m4ttjacob...@gmail.com>> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] We

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco ATA Devices need reset

2018-09-19 Thread Ryan Huff
Back in they day with the older 186 & 187s, there was this issue where the ATA would lose registration if the second/other port was not configured with a DN. If that is the case, try and configure the other port and see if that improves your experience. It looks like someone has reported a

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway Search Rules - Source:Any -or- Source-Named Zone

2018-09-13 Thread Ryan Huff
Pardon ... “the E’s search rule” ... I said traversal zone. Email needs a delete like WebEx Teams ... Sent from my iPhone On Sep 13, 2018, at 11:53, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: The source for the E’s traversal zone only needs to be ‘ANY’, if it truly needs to be

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway Search Rules - Source:Any -or- Source-Named Zone

2018-09-13 Thread Ryan Huff
The source for the E’s traversal zone only needs to be ‘ANY’, if it truly needs to be. I’ve deployed several scenarios where the business only wanted to receive B2B calls from other things on it’s own domain (or a few domains strung together in Regex). Also, using the Call Policy engine (under

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE setup to Centurylink SIP Trunk

2018-09-12 Thread Ryan Huff
nks, Ryan From: NateCCIE Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 9:54 PM To: 'Ryan Huff'; 'Jason Aarons (Americas)'; 'cisco-voip' Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CUBE setup to Centurylink SIP Trunk I don’t see any reason to include the media address in the trusted list. That wou

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE setup to Centurylink SIP Trunk

2018-09-12 Thread Ryan Huff
Target the signaling address in your dial peers, the media address will be advertised in the SDP. Make sure to include both in your IP Trusted List ACL (under the voice service voip configuration) as well as any CUCM signaling nodes that are not directly targeted by a dial-peer (but I typically

Re: [cisco-voip] Webex hybrid call service connect unable to find user

2018-09-10 Thread Ryan Huff
e mailto:bmead...@vt.edu>> Sent: Friday, 7 September 2018 9:25 PM To: Dana Tong mailto:dana.t...@yellit.com.au>> Cc: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>>; cisco-voip voyp list mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Webex hybrid call service conn

Re: [cisco-voip] Webex hybrid call service connect unable to find user

2018-09-06 Thread Ryan Huff
When you added the WebEx Board, did you select Hybrid Calling for PSTN calling? Also, the WebEx Board device, needs represented as an end user in cucm with a uri for the OBTP feature to work. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 6, 2018, at 20:31, Dana Tong mailto:dana.t...@yellit.com.au>> wrote: So

Re: [cisco-voip] Webex hybrid call service connect unable to find user

2018-09-06 Thread Ryan Huff
I would grab some pcaps and diag logs Is your MTLS setup correctly? Sent from my iPhone On Sep 6, 2018, at 06:34, Dana Tong mailto:dana.t...@yellit.com.au>> wrote: Further to this. When I search all users, the user is present but it looks like he controls many phones which is odd. I’ve

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber Phone Mode - Login ID

2018-09-05 Thread Ryan Huff
So for the UDS integration which is what it sounds like you’re doing; the userid field is what you have. If your user’s have an Active Directory, and the sAMAccountName and domain name of the user’s AD profile match the user’s email address convention, the fix would be to simply integrate CUCM

Re: [cisco-voip] weird behaviour when dialing webex personal room SIP URI when logged into (webex) meetings tab in Jabber

2018-09-05 Thread Ryan Huff
NP%2BCdyxveTcY%3D=0> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook From: Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 8:31 PM To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>; Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >